This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:
Address | Surroundings | Created on |
---|---|---|
0.50-mi Radius | 05/19/2024 |
Nestled Serenity with Urban Proximity
Alamo Heights, centered around 208 Alta Ave within the Uptown Central neighborhood, is a distinguished enclave in San Antonio, TX. Traditionally regarded as an affluent and prestigious community, Alamo Heights was established in the early 20th century and has long been synonymous with upscale living and historical charm. The area is renowned for its tree-lined streets, architecturally significant homes, and an exceptional school district. Residents here often enjoy a reputation for being well-educated, upper-middle-class professionals who value quality living in a serene yet richly connected environment.
Hallmarks of an Affluent Oasis
The area is abundant with positive attributes that distinguish it from many other neighborhoods. The high median household income of $155,486 reflects the strong economic standing of residents, while the impressive educational attainment, with 81% holding a college or graduate degree, underscores the intellectual capital present. These factors combine to create a community ripe with resources and opportunities for personal and professional networking.
Alamo Heights' safety statistics further enhance its appeal. With a property crime index of 112 and a personal crime index of 83, the area is relatively secure, especially given the national averages. Additionally, the zero recorded annual fatal car accidents and registered sex offenders per square mile provide significant peace of mind.
One pivotal component of Alamo Heights' charm is the Alamo Heights Independent School District, known for educational excellence, boasting a 95th percentile state ranking and a favorable student-to-teacher ratio of 13. This high-quality educational environment is a key driver for families considering residency here.
Caveats of a Prestigious Locale
However, not all aspects of Alamo Heights shine as brightly. The forecasted 5-year population decline of -0.60% suggests a tightening in the community's growth, potentially limiting the vibrancy associated with an influx of new residents. The median home value appreciation forecast of -2.25% is concerning for potential investors looking for property value growth. High home values averaging $608,918, combined with a rent ratio of 0.0020, indicate that while the area is a haven for homeowners, the rental market may be relatively inaccessible.
Traffic noise and aircraft disturbances, reflected in the sound score of 78, present another consideration, especially for those valuing tranquility. Moreover, moderate flood risks necessitate due diligence and possibly additional insurance costs, which can impact financial planning for prospective buyers.
Vibrancy and Community: Beyond Data
What the statistics don’t capture is the unique community spirit that defines Alamo Heights. The neighborhood boasts a rich tapestry of cultural activities and outdoor spaces. The McNay Art Museum, one of the oldest modern art museums in Texas, and the Witte Museum, provide rich cultural escapes. Alamo Quarry Market and The Shops at Lincoln Heights cater to retail enthusiasts.
Recreational pursuits include the Olmos Basin Golf Course and extensive parks like the Alamo Heights Swimming Pool & Tennis Club, making the area appealing for an active lifestyle. Annual events like the Alamo Heights Night and the Alamo Heights Sports Park competitions foster a strong sense of community.
Ideal Residents and Comparable Havens
Families with children and professionals seeking a high quality of life would undoubtedly thrive here, benefiting from excellent schools and family-oriented amenities. Similar neighborhoods include Terrell Hills, Olmos Park, and Stone Oak – all offering comparable affluence, excellent schools, and community-focused living.
Considering Alternatives
On the flip side, young renters, budget-conscious households, and those preferring a more bustling urban core might find Alamo Heights less accommodating. For these demographics, areas like Southtown offer a more gamically vibrant lifestyle with a focus on arts and nightlife. Conversely, Castle Hills or Helotes may offer slightly more affordable living expenses while retaining a semblance of suburban charm.
Investment Insights
The area presents a mixed bag for investors. While the loam home value appreciation and population growth projections are concerning, the robustness of the neighborhood’s economic profile and its low-risk nature provide a buffer. Prospective investors should weigh the stability of owning in a well-established, affluent area against potentially higher-yield opportunities elsewhere. The lack of low-income housing units suggests a targeted demographic which, while exclusive, constrains diversification options.
Final Considerations
Ultimately, Alamo Heights offers an exclusive, affluent living environment with high safety, educational excellence, and a tight-knit community atmosphere. While growth prospects and rental viability may present challenges, the area’s historical prestige and inherent quality make it a compelling choice for those aligned with its offerings.
Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.
Population | 3,482 |
---|---|
Population (5-Year Projection) | 3,461 |
5-Year Growth Forecast | -0.60% |
Density (Person per Square Mile) | 4,408 |
Density Level | Medium High |
The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.
Number of Households | 1,421 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Household Size | 2.45 | ||||||||
Household Makeup | |||||||||
Families with Kids | 38.00% | ||||||||
Families without Kids | 31.95% | ||||||||
Non-Families | 30.05% |
Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.
Median Age | 43.70 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Groups | |||||||||
0-9 Years | 11.43% | ||||||||
10-19 Years | 14.13% | ||||||||
20-34 Years | 13.90% | ||||||||
35-49 Years | 18.81% | ||||||||
50-64 Years | 22.95% | ||||||||
65+ Years | 18.78% |
This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.
Non-Hispanic White | 71.65% |
---|---|
Hispanic | 20.62% |
Black/African American | 0.83% |
Asian | 2.44% |
Other | 4.45% |
Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.
Average Schooling Years | 17.29 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Attainment Breakdown | |||||||||
Less than High School | 0.37% | ||||||||
High School or Some College | 18.44% | ||||||||
College Degree | 51.29% | ||||||||
Graduate/Professional Degree | 29.89% |
This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.
Median Household Income | $155,500 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Food Stamps/SNAP | 0.00% | ||||||||
Income Brackets | |||||||||
$0-$25K | 7.04% | ||||||||
$25K-$50K | 6.97% | ||||||||
$50K-$100K | 18.93% | ||||||||
$100K-$200K | 25.55% | ||||||||
$200K+ | 41.59% |
Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.
Total Housing Units | 1,571 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupancy | |||||||||
Owner Occupied | 70.27% | ||||||||
Renter Occupied | 20.18% | ||||||||
Vacant | 9.55% |
The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.
Main Types of Subsidized Housing:
In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.
Total Properties | 0 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Closest Property (mi) | - | ||||||||
Total Units | 0 | ||||||||
Units per Square Mile | 0.00 | ||||||||
Property Types | |||||||||
Public Housing | - | ||||||||
Section 8 | - | ||||||||
LIHTC | - |
Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.
Concise descriptions for each land cover category:
Landscaped Areas | 29.97% |
---|---|
Residential Areas | 64.55% |
Urban & Commercial | 5.47% |
Water Bodies | 0.00% |
Wooded Areas | 0.00% |
Wild Vegetation | 0.00% |
Farms & Gardens | 0.00% |
Marshes & Swamps | 0.00% |
Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.
Total Crime Index | 107 |
---|---|
Property Crime Index | 112 |
Personal Crime Index | 83 |
Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.
You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:
Data Period | 2019-2022 |
---|---|
All Fatal Accidents | 0 |
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile | 0.00 |
Involving DUI | - |
This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.
Total Sex Offenders | 0 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex Offenders per Square Mile | 0.00 | ||||||||
Closest Sex Offender (mi) | - | ||||||||
Conviction Type | |||||||||
Offense Against Children | 0 | ||||||||
Rape | 0 | ||||||||
Sexual Battery | 0 | ||||||||
Other Offense | 0 |
In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.
On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.
Main District | Alamo Heights ISD |
---|---|
Grade Range | PK-12 |
Number of Schools | 6 |
Number of Students | 4,762 |
Student/Teacher Ratio | 13.30 |
State Rank | 48 out of 968 |
State Rank Percentile | 95.04% |
Other Nearby Districts | - |
Name | Level | District | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cambridge Elementary | Elementary (1-5) | Alamo Heights ISD | 0.37 | 772 | 87.80% | 12.10 | 23.58% | 48.70% | 41.97% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Alamo Heights High School | High (9-12) | Alamo Heights ISD | 0.48 | 1,606 | 85.93% | 13.30 | 17.31% | 54.67% | 38.98% | 2.05% | 2.55% |
Alamo Heights J H | Middle (6-8) | Alamo Heights ISD | 1.22 | 1,090 | 85.58% | 14.60 | 24.50% | 51.28% | 40.83% | 2.20% | 3.67% |
Howard Elementary | Elementary (PK-K) | Alamo Heights ISD | 1.23 | 414 | - | 12.10 | 31.16% | 48.31% | 44.44% | 0.72% | 1.45% |
Woodridge Elementary | Elementary (1-5) | Alamo Heights ISD | 1.52 | 878 | 93.63% | 13.20 | 19.25% | 55.81% | 35.88% | 2.05% | 2.73% |
For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:
The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.
Name | Level | Type | Faith Affiliation | Coed | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St Lukes Episcopal School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Episcopal | Coed | 0.69 | 245 | - | 7.80 | - | 56.33% | 17.96% | 4.49% | 1.63% |
St Peter Prince Of The Apostles School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 0.90 | 141 | - | 8.20 | - | 21.99% | 48.23% | 6.38% | 8.51% |
Incarnate Word High School | Private (9-12) | Private | Roman Catholic | Girls | 1.37 | 370 | - | 12.30 | - | 18.65% | 73.78% | 1.89% | 2.97% |
Sunshine Cottage School For Deaf Children | Private (PK-5) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.45 | 184 | - | 4.80 | - | 17.93% | 38.04% | 5.98% | 2.17% |
St Andrews Umc Weekday School | Private (PK-K) | Private | Methodist | Coed | 1.44 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Southwest Preparatory School | Elementary (PK-5) | Charter | - | - | 1.55 | 53 | 2.39% | 8.80 | 94.34% | 5.66% | 69.81% | 22.64% | 0.00% |
New Directions | High (6-12) | Charter | - | - | 1.55 | 69 | 8.67% | 6.90 | 82.61% | 10.14% | 71.01% | 15.94% | 0.00% |
The Circle School | Private (K-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.66 | 73 | - | 9.20 | - | 49.32% | 47.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Lamar Elementary | Elementary (PK-6) | Charter | - | - | 1.80 | 297 | 64.54% | 11.30 | 72.05% | 16.84% | 75.76% | 3.03% | 0.00% |
KIPP Poder Academy | Middle (6-8) | Charter | - | - | 1.81 | 226 | 45.19% | 10.70 | 82.74% | 5.75% | 82.74% | 7.96% | 0.88% |
St Davids Episcopal School | Private (PK-K) | Private | Episcopal | Coed | 1.83 | 204 | - | 7.00 | - | 3.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
The Acorn - A School For Young Children | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.83 | 111 | - | 6.00 | - | 0.00% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 13.51% |
Jhw Inspire Academies- Rise Recovery | High (9-12) | Charter | - | - | 1.96 | 16 | 19.89% | 5.00 | 43.75% | 43.75% | 56.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Legacy Traditional School - Oblate | Elementary (PK-5) | Charter | - | - | 2.02 | 146 | 13.77% | 23.10 | 67.12% | 5.48% | 80.82% | 13.01% | 0.00% |
Blessed Sacrament Catholic School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 2.13 | 168 | - | 8.00 | - | 5.36% | 82.14% | 2.38% | 1.19% |
St Anthony Catholic High School | Private (9-12) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 2.15 | 266 | - | 9.30 | - | 19.17% | 78.57% | 1.88% | 0.38% |
Great Hearts Monte Vista North | High (6-12) | Charter | - | - | 2.26 | 444 | 76.64% | 13.60 | 23.87% | 43.24% | 50.90% | 1.35% | 2.25% |
Somerset Academy Lone Star | Elementary (PK-5) | Charter | - | - | 2.31 | 188 | 17.19% | 13.00 | 81.38% | 6.91% | 87.23% | 2.66% | 0.53% |
One School Global | Private (4-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.34 | 27 | - | 7.90 | - | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
George Gervin Academy | Alternative (PK-12) | Charter | - | - | 2.46 | 622 | - | 14.20 | 100.00% | 2.41% | 50.32% | 44.37% | 0.48% |
Ruth Jones McClendon Middle | Alternative (PK-12) | Charter | - | - | 2.47 | 67 | - | 26.40 | 100.00% | 2.99% | 61.19% | 35.82% | 0.00% |
St Pius X Catholic School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 2.48 | 217 | - | 12.80 | - | 30.41% | 46.08% | 1.38% | 1.38% |
Mount Sacred Heart School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 2.55 | 170 | - | 9.80 | - | 15.29% | 67.65% | 2.35% | 1.18% |
Keystone School | Private (PK-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.70 | 508 | - | 8.50 | - | 32.48% | 21.46% | 2.56% | 17.13% |
Mark Twain Dual Language Academy | Elementary (PK-8) | Charter | - | - | 2.71 | 608 | 73.70% | 17.00 | 56.91% | 5.43% | 91.45% | 1.32% | 0.33% |
Legacy Traditional School - Basse | High (9-12) | Charter | - | - | 2.74 | 91 | 14.69% | 10.30 | 51.65% | 4.40% | 74.73% | 20.88% | 0.00% |
River City Christian School | Private (1-12) | Private | Christian (no specific denomination) | Coed | 2.76 | 63 | - | 5.60 | - | 50.79% | 30.16% | 3.17% | 1.59% |
San Antonio Academy Of Texas | Private (PK-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Boys | 2.79 | 332 | - | 6.90 | - | 68.67% | 12.65% | 1.51% | 4.52% |
Legacy Traditional School - Alamo Ranch | Elementary (K-8) | Charter | - | - | 2.79 | 155 | 4.56% | 14.20 | 63.87% | 4.52% | 69.03% | 21.94% | 0.65% |
Hawthorne Pk-8 Academy | Elementary (PK-8) | Charter | - | - | 2.83 | 621 | 15.36% | 16.40 | 78.90% | 4.83% | 89.86% | 3.38% | 0.64% |
Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.
Poor or Very Poor Air Quality | 0.60% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worst Month | September | ||||||||
Major Pollutant | O3 | ||||||||
Pollutants | |||||||||
Bad or Very Bad SO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad NO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM10 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad O3 | 0.18% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad CO | 0.00% |
A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.
Sound Score | 78 (Active) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Noise | |||||||||
Airports | Active | ||||||||
Vehicular Traffic | Active | ||||||||
Local Commercial and Community | Calm |
Using Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS), this section forecasts the potential earthquake impact and damage likelihood in the area over the next 50 years, offering vital insights into seismic risks.
PGA | 0.02 |
---|---|
Earthquake Risk | No Risk |
The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.
On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:
Has High-Risk Zones | Yes |
---|---|
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) | 0.35 |
Has Moderate-Risk Zones | Yes |
The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.
Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.
Walk Score® | 73 (Very Walkable) |
---|---|
Bike Score® | 42 (Somewhat Bikeable) |
Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.
Marrital Status | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single, Never Married | 33.17% | ||||||||
Married | 56.24% | ||||||||
Other | 10.59% | ||||||||
Female to Male Ratio | 1.06 |
Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.
Has Any Pet | 55.24% |
---|---|
Has Dog(s) | 35.47% |
Has Cat(s) | 19.77% |
Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.
On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:
2020 Presidential Election Results | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Biden | 53.08% | ||||||||
Donald Trump | 45.59% |
Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.
Very Liberal | 26.81% |
---|---|
Somewhat Liberal | 39.07% |
Somewhat Conservative | 22.27% |
Very Conservative | 11.84% |
Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.
Median Home Value | 608,918 |
---|---|
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value | 595,227 |
5-Year Appreciation Forecast | -2.25% |
Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.
Median Monthly Rent | 1,198 |
---|---|
Median Home Value | 608,918 |
Rent to Value Ratio | 0.20% |
The Desirability Score measures how closely an area approaches a "perfect" neighborhood. This ideal is characterized by no crime or safety concerns, top-tier schools, a highly-educated population, no noise or air pollution, no risk of earthquakes or floods, high walkability, and a harmonious mix of nature and development.
The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating closer alignment to this ideal.
Desirability Score | 76.20 |
---|
The Bang for the Buck Index measures the ratio of the expected cost of a neighborhood based on its characteristics to its actual cost. An index close to 1 implies that the neighborhood's value is on par with its qualities.
An index greater than 1 indicates that the area offers excellent value for what it provides, while an index less than 1 suggests that the area may be overpriced.
Note that this measure is estimated relative to the entire US housing market, not just the local market.
Bang for the Buck | 58.33 |
---|
Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.