This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Burns Park

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
1.01-mi Radius 09/05/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Charm: Burns Park is named after the Scottish poet Robert Burns and features a historic park with a pavilion built in 1910.
  • Architectural Diversity: The neighborhood boasts a variety of architectural styles, including Colonial Revival, Tudor, and Craftsman homes, reflecting its development from the early 20th century.
  • Academic Hub: Located near the University of Michigan, Burns Park is home to many students, faculty, and staff, contributing to its vibrant and youthful atmosphere.

Suitability

  • Youthful Demographic: With 64% of the population being young adults (20-39), Burns Park aligns well with your age group and lifestyle.
  • Educational Environment: The high percentage (81%) of residents with college or graduate degrees suggests a well-educated community, which may be appealing given your long-term residency plans.
  • Safety Considerations: The personal crime index of 73 is below the national average, indicating a relatively safe environment, though the presence of 7 registered sex offenders should be noted.
  • Home Ownership: With only 25% of homes being owner-occupied, the area has a transient feel, which might not be ideal for long-term stability.
  • Overall Conclusion: Burns Park offers a dynamic and educated community with a youthful vibe, making it a suitable choice for a young couple planning to reside long-term, provided you are comfortable with the lower homeownership rate.

The Positive

  • High Walkability: With a Walk Score of 80, you can easily access amenities, parks, and restaurants on foot, enhancing your daily convenience and lifestyle.
  • Biker's Paradise: The Bike Score of 92 indicates excellent biking infrastructure, perfect for an active and eco-friendly lifestyle.
  • Educational Excellence: Ann Arbor Public Schools rank in the 88th percentile statewide, ensuring high-quality education should you plan to start a family in the future.

The Negative

  • High Median Home Value: At $555,122, the median home value is relatively high, which may be a financial consideration for a young couple.
  • Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could lead to potential property damage and higher insurance costs.
  • Transient Population: With 68% of the housing being renter-occupied, the neighborhood may lack the long-term community stability you might desire.

Alternatives

  • Kerrytown : Known for its historic charm and vibrant farmers' market, Kerrytown offers a similar youthful vibe with a slightly higher owner-occupancy rate. However, it also has a high median home value.
  • Old West Side : This neighborhood features beautiful historic homes and a strong sense of community with a higher percentage of owner-occupied homes. It offers a quieter environment while still being close to downtown Ann Arbor.
  • Water Hill : A family-friendly neighborhood with a mix of historic and modern homes, Water Hill has a higher owner-occupancy rate and is known for its annual music festival. It provides a more stable community environment while still being near the city center.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

63/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

62/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 29,756
Population (5-Year Projection) 30,027
5-Year Growth Forecast 0.91%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 9,299
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 10,051
Average Household Size 2.96
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 8.56%
Families without Kids 19.10%
Non-Families 72.34%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 23.20
Age Groups
0-9 Years 4.53%
10-19 Years 15.75%
20-34 Years 61.52%
35-49 Years 7.08%
50-64 Years 5.48%
65+ Years 5.63%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 69.13%
Hispanic 6.19%
Black/African American 5.01%
Asian 13.89%
Other 5.78%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 17.70
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 2.49%
High School or Some College 16.93%
College Degree 32.63%
Graduate/Professional Degree 47.95%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $51,000
On Food Stamps/SNAP 2.65%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 27.92%
$25K-$50K 21.53%
$50K-$100K 17.64%
$100K-$200K 21.18%
$200K+ 11.72%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 10,776
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 25.34%
Renter Occupied 67.93%
Vacant 6.73%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1961
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.44%
Recent (2010-2019) 8.69%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 18.74%
Old (Before 1980) 72.14%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 1
Closest Property (mi) 1.01
Total Units 116
Units per Square Mile 36.25
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC 1 (116 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 23.18%
Residential Areas 57.99%
Urban & Commercial 17.75%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 0.94%
Wild Vegetation 0.00%
Farms & Gardens 0.11%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 92
Property Crime Index 95
Personal Crime Index 73

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 2
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.16
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 7
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 2.19
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.30
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 4
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 1
Other Offense 2
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 JOSHUA ALEXANDER CHYNOWETH
1041 OLIVIA AVENUE, ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
2 AARON THOMAS PALMER
1510 WHITE ST 204, ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
0.35 mi Other Offense
3 FRED BLACKMON
1510 WHITE ST, ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
0.37 mi Other Offense
4 MARC ADAM WILKINSON
1510 WHITE STREET 102, ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
0.37 mi Sexual Battery
5 MICHELE MARIE CORCORAN
824 STIMSON STREET, ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
0.39 mi Offense Against Children
6 JEFFREY THOMAS DAYTON
806 STIMSON ST, ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
7 RODNEY ALAN WORTHING
1622 E STADIUM BLVD, ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
0.57 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Ann Arbor Public Schools
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 32
Number of Students 17,026
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.81
State Rank 71 out of 610
State Rank Percentile 88.36%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Burns Park Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 0.24 487 93.47% 15.20 22.18% 56.26% 11.09% 10.06% 10.88%
Angell School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 0.71 298 99.26% 14.10 20.13% 55.70% 9.73% 6.04% 17.79%
Tappan Middle School Middle (6-8) Ann Arbor Public Schools 0.91 680 90.41% 15.20 27.94% 54.12% 11.32% 15.29% 9.85%
Pioneer High School High (9-12) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.02 1,700 95.69% 16.30 22.71% 53.59% 9.88% 12.94% 14.29%
Pattengill School Elementary (3-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.06 221 53.23% 11.10 52.04% 40.72% 11.31% 26.24% 8.60%
Bach Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.26 344 97.58% 13.80 16.28% 65.70% 9.30% 5.23% 4.07%
Community High School High (9-12) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.34 506 98.92% 14.40 8.89% 74.90% 7.71% 4.94% 2.96%
Pathways To Success Academic Campus High (9-12) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.45 258 9.02% 16.70 71.32% 26.74% 13.57% 43.02% 1.55%
Eberwhite School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.56 352 96.10% 14.80 12.78% 70.74% 8.24% 6.53% 3.12%
John Allen School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.58 381 81.56% 12.60 41.73% 51.71% 10.24% 16.80% 9.19%
Slauson Middle School Middle (6-8) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.66 736 96.32% 19.00 21.06% 60.19% 11.41% 8.70% 13.04%
Uriah H Lawton School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.70 438 96.90% 13.80 12.10% 47.49% 5.94% 8.22% 24.89%
Ann Arbor Open at Mack School Elementary (K-8) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.95 517 92.40% 15.60 11.03% 72.15% 6.77% 1.55% 4.84%
Huron High School High (9-12) Ann Arbor Public Schools 1.96 1,635 88.02% 14.30 31.38% 34.62% 11.99% 21.59% 18.96%
Dicken Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.12 291 89.57% 12.30 25.77% 58.42% 12.71% 11.00% 6.53%
Ann Arbor STEAM at Northside School Elementary (K-8) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.28 601 88.63% 14.20 21.80% 56.07% 8.49% 9.15% 13.14%
Pittsfield School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.45 237 57.20% 10.60 46.41% 40.93% 21.52% 19.83% 6.75%
Clifford E Bryant Community School Elementary (K-2) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.50 226 - 8.80 43.81% 38.94% 10.18% 27.43% 12.83%
Forsythe Middle School Middle (6-8) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.67 578 94.54% 14.50 25.78% 61.76% 7.61% 11.59% 7.79%
Haisley Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.68 369 80.42% 11.20 31.71% 53.39% 9.49% 15.45% 9.76%
Martin Luther King Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.82 508 99.60% 17.40 10.04% 31.30% 6.30% 5.71% 41.34%
Wines Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.86 401 98.72% 15.80 7.73% 71.32% 7.98% 1.75% 6.48%
Mary D Mitchell School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.92 432 20.66% 11.40 53.94% 40.74% 22.45% 20.14% 3.01%
Lakewood Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.94 265 78.13% 10.90 38.49% 48.30% 24.53% 1.89% 12.45%
Correctional Services High (9-12) Ann Arbor Public Schools 2.95 3 - 15.00 - 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Scarlett Middle School Middle (6-8) Ann Arbor Public Schools 3.02 615 51.39% 13.00 53.17% 31.54% 16.91% 33.01% 5.37%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Beth Israel Religious School Private (PK-12) Private Jewish Coed 0.68 - - - - - - - -
Clonlara School Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.84 305 - 32.10 - 91.15% 0.00% 2.95% 5.90%
Ann Arbor Children's House Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.94 19 - 0.20 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
St Francis Of Assisi School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.00 453 - 14.20 - 69.09% 11.92% 2.87% 1.10%
Central Academy Alternative (PK-12) Charter - - 1.07 530 - 14.40 88.30% 73.21% 3.58% 14.15% 8.87%
Doughty Montessori School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.11 - - - - - - - -
Ann Arbor Hills Child Dev. Center Private (PK-2) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.60 93 - 4.20 - 10.75% 1.08% 1.08% 0.00%
Hebrew Day School Of Ann Arbor Private (K-5) Private Jewish Coed 1.92 70 - 6.10 - 98.57% 0.00% 1.43% 0.00%
Summers-Knoll School Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.93 124 - 7.40 - 54.03% 0.81% 3.23% 8.06%
Ann Arbor Adventist Elementary Private (1-7) Private Seventh-Day Adventist Coed 1.98 10 - 10.00 - 20.00% 50.00% 10.00% 0.00%
Veritas Christi Catholic High School Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.08 72 - 37.80 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Life Learning Community Private (K-11) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 2.35 - - - - - - - -
Ann Arbor Academy Private (4-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.46 79 - 3.20 - 78.48% 1.27% 10.13% 3.80%
Michigan Islamic Academy Private (PK-12) Private Islamic Coed 2.68 269 - 7.60 - 55.76% 0.00% 5.20% 29.74%
Rudolf Steiner School Of Ann Arbor Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.74 80 - 6.60 - 73.75% 7.50% 3.75% 5.00%
St Paul Lutheran School Private (PK-8) Private Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod Coed 2.76 290 - 13.80 - 57.59% 0.00% 3.45% 6.21%
Honey Creek Community School Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 3.15 251 76.45% 13.10 15.54% 67.33% 9.56% 4.38% 4.38%
Greenhills School Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.18 635 - 8.80 - 51.18% 4.25% 6.77% 26.93%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System ANN ARBOR
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 118,017
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0023 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.61%
Worst Month August
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.37%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 36
High-Risk Sites 2
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.63
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.92
Facility Types
Active 25
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 2
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 1

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 73 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.06
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.62
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 80 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 92 (Biker's Paradise)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 80.26%
Married 17.27%
Other 2.47%
Female to Male Ratio 0.98

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 38.22%
Has Dog(s) 23.53%
Has Cat(s) 19.92%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 86.87%
Donald Trump 12.21%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 30.59%
Somewhat Liberal 39.61%
Somewhat Conservative 21.80%
Very Conservative 8.00%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 555,122
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 571,575
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 2.96%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,804
Median Home Value 555,122
Rent to Value Ratio 0.32%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.