This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Cambridge

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
Custom Shape 08/18/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Hub: Cambridge is home to two of the world's most prestigious universities, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which have been shaping the intellectual landscape since the 17th and 19th centuries, respectively.
  • Literary Legends: The city has been a haven for literary giants like Henry James, T.S. Eliot, and e.e. cummings, making it a cultural and intellectual epicenter.
  • Tech Innovation: Known as the "Silicon Valley of the East," Cambridge hosts numerous tech startups and research labs, contributing to its vibrant and innovative atmosphere.

Suitability

  • Young and Dynamic: With 55% of the population being young adults (20-39), Cambridge offers a vibrant social scene that aligns well with your lifestyle as a young couple.
  • High Education Levels: The area boasts a highly educated population, with 78% holding a college or graduate degree, which could provide ample networking opportunities.
  • Safety Considerations: The property and personal crime indices are slightly below the national average, making it relatively safe, though it's essential to stay aware of your surroundings.
  • High Rent Costs: The median monthly rent of $3,140 might be on the higher side, so ensure it fits within your budget.
  • Overall Conclusion: Cambridge is a highly suitable area for a young couple looking for a vibrant, intellectually stimulating environment, albeit with a higher cost of living.

The Positive

  • Walker's Paradise: With a Walk Score of 94/100, you can accomplish most errands on foot, making daily life convenient and eco-friendly.
  • Biker's Paradise: A Bike Score of 98/100 means you can easily navigate the city on two wheels, promoting a healthy and active lifestyle.
  • Excellent Transit: The Transit Score of 77/100 indicates robust public transportation options, reducing the need for a car and simplifying commutes.
  • Cultural Richness: The presence of Harvard and MIT brings a plethora of cultural events, lectures, and activities, enriching your social and intellectual life.

The Negative

  • High Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could affect your property and safety. Consider flood insurance and stay informed about flood zones.
  • Sound Levels: With a sound score of 66, the area can be quite busy and noisy, which might be a concern if you prefer a quieter environment.
  • High Rent Costs: The median monthly rent of $3,140 is significantly high, which could strain your budget unless you have a high income or are willing to compromise on space or amenities.

Alternatives

  • Somerville : Offers a similar vibrant atmosphere with slightly lower rent costs. It has a strong community feel and excellent public transportation but can be noisy and crowded.
  • Arlington : Known for its excellent school district and family-friendly environment. It offers a quieter, more suburban feel while still being close to Cambridge, though it may lack the same level of nightlife and cultural activities.
  • Medford : Provides a more affordable living option with good public transportation and proximity to Cambridge. However, it may not have the same level of cultural and intellectual vibrancy as Cambridge.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

47/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

24/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 177,437
Population (5-Year Projection) 180,982
5-Year Growth Forecast 2.00%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 18,816
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 74,608
Average Household Size 2.38
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 15.82%
Families without Kids 22.35%
Non-Families 61.83%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 31.90
Age Groups
0-9 Years 6.96%
10-19 Years 7.17%
20-34 Years 46.32%
35-49 Years 18.37%
50-64 Years 10.20%
65+ Years 10.98%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 57.66%
Hispanic 9.84%
Black/African American 8.30%
Asian 17.40%
Other 6.80%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 17.40
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 4.58%
High School or Some College 17.56%
College Degree 33.83%
Graduate/Professional Degree 44.03%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $124,700
On Food Stamps/SNAP 7.22%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 12.01%
$25K-$50K 8.85%
$50K-$100K 19.17%
$100K-$200K 30.42%
$200K+ 29.54%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 81,064
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 29.34%
Renter Occupied 62.69%
Vacant 7.96%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1940
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.19%
Recent (2010-2019) 5.72%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 16.09%
Old (Before 1980) 78.00%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 55
Closest Property (mi) 0.48
Total Units 4,643
Units per Square Mile 492.36
Property Types
Public Housing 4 (515 Units)
Section 8 18 (1533 Units)
LIHTC 33 (2595 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 2.36%
Residential Areas 32.72%
Urban & Commercial 61.66%
Water Bodies 2.72%
Wooded Areas 0.19%
Wild Vegetation 0.07%
Farms & Gardens 0.00%
Marshes & Swamps 0.22%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 83
Property Crime Index 83
Personal Crime Index 85

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 12
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.32
Involving DUI 8.33%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 19
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 2.01
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.18
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 8
Rape 2
Sexual Battery 4
Other Offense 5

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Cambridge School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 17
Number of Students 6,746
Student/Teacher Ratio 8.89
State Rank 85 out of 356
State Rank Percentile 76.12%
Other Nearby Districts Arlington School District, Boston School District, Medford School District, Somerville School District, Watertown School District
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Cambridge Rindge and Latin High (9-12) Cambridge 0.13 1,867 67.72% 8.60 - 36.90% 15.16% 26.08% 11.09%
John M Tobin Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 0.35 320 95.46% 10.50 - 39.69% 7.81% 23.75% 15.94%
Putnam Avenue Upper School Middle (6-8) Cambridge 0.49 251 69.42% 6.80 - 26.29% 12.35% 30.68% 15.94%
Martin Luther King Junior Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 0.51 332 99.57% 9.40 - 23.19% 4.22% 12.05% 35.84%
Cambridgeport Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 0.68 255 91.25% 9.50 - 51.37% 6.67% 16.47% 10.98%
Albert F. Argenziano School at Lincoln Park Elementary (PK-8) Somerville 0.68 544 38.55% 12.40 - 44.30% 35.66% 5.15% 7.35%
Maria L. Baldwin Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 0.70 340 91.90% 9.50 - 57.35% 9.12% 10.00% 9.12%
Amigos School Elementary (PK-8) Cambridge 0.74 407 84.88% 10.60 - 34.40% 50.12% 4.67% 3.44%
Fletcher/Maynard Academy Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 0.84 254 34.45% 7.30 - 10.24% 20.87% 51.57% 7.09%
King Open Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 0.93 371 42.87% 9.30 - 36.66% 13.48% 22.64% 13.21%
Cambridge Street Upper School Middle (6-8) Cambridge 0.94 293 60.56% 8.50 - 39.59% 11.60% 26.96% 10.92%
Graham and Parks Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 0.98 362 78.94% 10.20 - 52.49% 9.12% 13.54% 16.57%
John F Kennedy Elementary (PK-8) Somerville 1.13 440 86.29% 13.20 - 67.50% 14.55% 4.32% 6.82%
Somerville High High (9-12) Somerville 1.13 1,310 42.07% 9.80 - 33.74% 47.18% 9.31% 5.73%
Vassal Lane Upper School Middle (6-8) Cambridge 1.18 273 76.86% 6.30 - 37.00% 10.99% 23.81% 17.58%
Kennedy-Longfellow Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 1.21 184 29.59% 5.90 - 22.83% 21.74% 23.37% 23.91%
Morse Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 1.23 294 80.67% 7.90 - 44.90% 8.84% 25.51% 9.52%
Capuano Early Childhood Center Elementary (PK-K) Somerville 1.31 213 - 9.80 - 38.50% 32.39% 7.51% 8.92%
Winter Hill Community Elementary (PK-8) Somerville 1.38 422 17.28% 9.20 - 32.23% 49.29% 9.48% 4.50%
E Somerville Community Elementary (PK-8) Somerville 1.47 729 20.09% 13.40 - 20.44% 66.80% 4.80% 4.94%
Next Wave Junior High Middle (7-8) Somerville 1.50 15 - 2.70 - 13.33% 53.33% 26.67% 0.00%
Full Circle High School High (9-12) Somerville 1.50 54 - 4.10 - 25.93% 53.70% 14.81% 0.00%
Gardner Pilot Academy Elementary (PK-8) Boston 1.53 386 24.84% 10.70 - 11.14% 67.62% 12.44% 4.66%
Rindge Avenue Upper School Middle (6-8) Cambridge 1.59 274 84.51% 8.60 - 49.27% 9.49% 22.26% 10.22%
Peabody Elementary (PK-5) Cambridge 1.59 318 90.93% 11.70 - 44.97% 8.18% 23.90% 15.09%
Benjamin G Brown Elementary (K-5) Somerville 1.66 211 84.02% 16.00 - 60.19% 7.11% 6.64% 9.48%
Arthur D Healey Elementary (PK-8) Somerville 1.81 506 32.40% 13.20 - 27.87% 49.60% 15.02% 2.96%
Missituk Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Medford 1.97 391 39.74% 9.60 - 57.54% 18.93% 8.44% 6.39%
Curtis-Tufts High (10-12) Medford 2.02 18 - 6.60 - 61.11% 11.11% 11.11% 0.00%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Saint Paul's Choir School Private (3-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.34 38 - 1.90 - 50.00% 13.16% 7.89% 26.32%
Prospect Hill Academy Charter School Alternative (PK-12) Charter - - 0.62 999 - 9.30 - 10.91% 21.22% 56.56% 6.81%
The Henry Buckner School Private (K-1) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.69 - - - - - - - -
James F Farr Academy Private (8-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.77 - - - - - - - -
St Theresa School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.93 179 - 15.70 - 13.41% 22.91% 30.73% 2.23%
Malik Academy/ Al Bustan Preschool Private (PK-8) Private Islamic Coed 0.93 54 - 6.00 - 18.52% 0.00% 24.07% 1.85%
St Peter School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.13 192 - 10.60 - 49.48% 12.50% 10.94% 10.42%
Community Charter School of Cambridge High (6-12) Charter - - 1.31 253 38.04% 7.60 - 4.74% 16.21% 70.75% 5.14%
Buckingham Browne & Nichols School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.34 1,439 - 9.70 - 81.65% 0.00% 1.39% 2.85%
Shady Hill School Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.43 543 - 7.00 - 36.83% 9.94% 4.97% 17.50%
Cambridge Friends School Private (PK-8) Private Friends Coed 1.44 143 - 6.00 - 44.06% 11.89% 16.08% 11.89%
Boston University Academy Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.56 220 - 8.80 - 51.36% 4.09% 3.64% 36.36%
MATCH Charter Public School Alternative (PK-12) Charter - - 1.59 1,186 - 9.40 - 1.26% 46.54% 48.99% 0.42%
German International School Boston Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.63 285 - 5.90 - 65.61% 2.46% 1.75% 3.51%
Benjamin Banneker Charter Public School Elementary (PK-6) Charter - - 1.70 332 97.62% 16.60 - 2.71% 8.13% 81.63% 1.81%
Wild Rose Montessori School Private (PK-4) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.72 36 - 3.50 - 61.11% 2.78% 5.56% 0.00%
New England Hebrew Academy Private (PK-7) Private Jewish Coed 1.73 78 - 6.10 - 87.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
St Herman Of Alaska Christian School Private (K-8) Private Other Coed 1.76 30 - 4.60 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Ivy Street School Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.81 50 - 4.50 - 60.00% 6.00% 20.00% 4.00%
Bright Future Educare Center Private (K-1) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.84 - - - - - - - -
Bay Cove Academy Private (7-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.85 27 - 6.10 - 33.33% 29.63% 33.33% 3.70%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CAMBRIDGE WATER DEPARTMENT
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 118,403
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0080 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 2.18%
Worst Month October
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.28%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.37%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 949
High-Risk Sites 39
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 4.14
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.21
Facility Types
Active 644
Transport 3
Large Quantity Generator 30
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 19

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 66 (Busy)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Busy

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA -
Earthquake Risk -

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.52
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 94 (Walker's Paradise)
Bike Score® 98 (Biker's Paradise)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 60.11%
Married 32.25%
Other 7.64%
Female to Male Ratio 0.93

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 34.64%
Has Dog(s) 21.56%
Has Cat(s) 16.67%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 88.83%
Donald Trump 9.09%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 37.48%
Somewhat Liberal 42.69%
Somewhat Conservative 14.90%
Very Conservative 4.93%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 1,072,781
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 1,172,172
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 9.26%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 3,140
Median Home Value 1,072,781
Rent to Value Ratio 0.29%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.