This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:
Address | Surroundings | Created on |
---|---|---|
1.90-mi Radius | 07/05/2024 |
A Detailed Portrait of Fresno, TX: Past and Present
Nestled in Fort Bend County, Fresno, Texas, serves as a vibrant and evolving suburban locale. Historically, Fresno has transitioned from a primarily agricultural area to a growing residential community, driven by spillover growth from Houston’s expanding metropolitan region. Its noteworthy characteristics span diverse demographic attributes, economic vigor, and its juxtaposition between rural openness and suburban infrastructure. The community is commonly perceived as family-friendly, reflecting its composition of largely married residents and high rate of homeownership, albeit with limited dining or entertainment options which can seem somewhat isolating for those used to more fast-paced urban living.
Merits of Growth and Opportunity
Fresno offers an ensemble of advantages for potential residents. Notably, the area boasts an impressive 5-year population growth forecast at 7.60%, indicative of a thriving and burgeoning community. The median household income stands at a robust $108,440, which, coupled with a significant portion of the population earning over $200,000 annually, underscores a financially secure and prosperous populace. Educational attainment is relatively balanced, with almost half the residents holding a college or graduate degree - a positive signal for families valuing education. The high owner-occupancy rate of 84% enhances the neighborhood's stability and sense of community.
Safety is another highlighted strength, with property and personal crime indices both markedly below the national average, creating a secure environment for residents. Furthermore, the high median home value of $330,000 and an anticipated appreciation forecast of 8.52% bode well for homeowners and investors alike, promising substantial return on investment. Complementing this economic landscape are sound public schools, particularly within the Alvin Independent School District, which outranks other school zones in the vicinity.
Challenges and Considerations
Despite its many advantages, Fresno is not without its challenges. The area's transportation infrastructure is glaringly lacking, reflected by dismal walk (17/100) and bike (30/100) scores, necessitating a reliance on personal vehicles and possibly amplifying resident costs and environmental burdens. Additionally, Fresno is subject to significant flood risks due to high exposure to 100-year flood zones, posing a potential threat to property and general safety. Coupled with this is a modest occurrence of vehicular accidents and registered sex offenders per square mile, relatively marginal issues that nonetheless warrant attention.
Mitigation measures include investing in comprehensive flood insurance, cultivating a robust emergency preparedness plan, and tempering personal vehicular use with occasional public transportation or carpooling efforts. For flood risk specifically, selecting higher elevation properties within Fresno or newer constructions with advanced flood mitigation designs may diminish prospective hazards.
Beyond Statistics: Community, Culture, and Amenities
One of Fresno's less quantifiable yet distinct attributes is its cultural mosaic and spirited communal vibe. The racial and ethnic diversity adds rich layers to community life, with 41% Hispanics and 35% Black/African Americans forming active cultural threads. Festivals, events, and local communal efforts occasionally celebrate this diverse heritage, although specific organized events may be less frequent compared to larger urban settings.
The local infrastructure includes several landscaped parks and recreational gardens, enhancing both aesthetic appeal and communal activity avenues. Facilities such as the Fort Bend County Library branch provide educational resources and community programs. Though the dining and entertainment scene remains limited, neighboring suburbs and a short commute to Houston ensure access to a wide array of culinary and leisure activities.
Ideal Residents and Comparable Neighborhoods
Families, in particular, would find Fresno's educational strengths, secure environment, and sense of community appealing. Young professionals seeking a quieter suburban life with easy access to metropolitan amenities might also benefit. Comparatively similar neighborhoods include Pearland, which shares Fresno’s balanced suburban allure and stronger school systems; Sugar Land, noted for its family-oriented amenities and robust economic indicators; and Missouri City, offering a comparable blend of community vigor and residential stability.
Potential Mismatches and Alternatives
Residents valuing close-knit urban infrastructure with vibrant nightlife, comprehensive public transportation, and immediate access to amenities may find Fresno's offerings lacking. For these households, neighborhoods such as Midtown Houston, offering bustling city life with extensive public transport and cultural vibrance, or The Heights, known for dynamic nightlife and close community feel, would be preferable. West University Place is another refined alternative offering high-end amenities with robust suburban charm.
Investment Prospects: A Prudent Bet
Fresno’s real estate potential sparkles with promise. The anticipated appreciation rate of house values, coupled with low crime rates and strong demographic growth, render Fresno a prudent investment. The high median household income and limited low-income housing projects suggest sustained property value growth and an affluent resident base. While attentiveness to flood risks and transportation developments is necessary, Fresno remains an attractive investment with a high return potential.
Final Thoughts: Making the Decision
Fresno, TX, stands at a compelling intersection of growth, community, and secure living. While some challenges persist, they are largely mitigatable and outweighed by the district's economic strength, educational opportunities, and secure environment. Factoring in both the tangible data and the nuanced elements of community vibes and amenities, Fresno represents a solid choice for family-oriented households or investors seeking stable returns. Should further insight or specific property guidance be required, detailed consultations can aid in refining the decision to align seamlessly with your lifestyle and investment aspirations.
Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.
Population | 25,025 |
---|---|
Population (5-Year Projection) | 26,927 |
5-Year Growth Forecast | 7.60% |
Density (Person per Square Mile) | 2,207 |
Density Level | Medium |
The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.
Number of Households | 7,511 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Household Size | 3.33 | ||||||||
Household Makeup | |||||||||
Families with Kids | 41.03% | ||||||||
Families without Kids | 37.12% | ||||||||
Non-Families | 21.85% |
Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.
Median Age | 34.40 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Groups | |||||||||
0-9 Years | 15.74% | ||||||||
10-19 Years | 15.65% | ||||||||
20-34 Years | 19.43% | ||||||||
35-49 Years | 24.31% | ||||||||
50-64 Years | 15.88% | ||||||||
65+ Years | 8.98% |
This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.
Non-Hispanic White | 9.17% |
---|---|
Hispanic | 41.14% |
Black/African American | 35.04% |
Asian | 11.75% |
Other | 2.91% |
Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.
Average Schooling Years | 15.18 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Attainment Breakdown | |||||||||
Less than High School | 12.54% | ||||||||
High School or Some College | 43.68% | ||||||||
College Degree | 26.77% | ||||||||
Graduate/Professional Degree | 17.00% |
This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.
Median Household Income | $108,400 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Food Stamps/SNAP | 4.49% | ||||||||
Income Brackets | |||||||||
$0-$25K | 6.55% | ||||||||
$25K-$50K | 10.61% | ||||||||
$50K-$100K | 28.72% | ||||||||
$100K-$200K | 33.58% | ||||||||
$200K+ | 20.54% |
Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.
Total Housing Units | 7,876 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupancy | |||||||||
Owner Occupied | 83.85% | ||||||||
Renter Occupied | 11.52% | ||||||||
Vacant | 4.63% |
The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.
Main Types of Subsidized Housing:
In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.
Total Properties | 0 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Closest Property (mi) | - | ||||||||
Total Units | 0 | ||||||||
Units per Square Mile | 0.00 | ||||||||
Property Types | |||||||||
Public Housing | - | ||||||||
Section 8 | - | ||||||||
LIHTC | - |
Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.
Concise descriptions for each land cover category:
Landscaped Areas | 13.20% |
---|---|
Residential Areas | 13.70% |
Urban & Commercial | 0.70% |
Water Bodies | 1.11% |
Wooded Areas | 7.10% |
Wild Vegetation | 3.23% |
Farms & Gardens | 43.46% |
Marshes & Swamps | 15.39% |
Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.
Total Crime Index | 84 |
---|---|
Property Crime Index | 88 |
Personal Crime Index | 64 |
Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.
You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:
Data Period | 2019-2022 |
---|---|
All Fatal Accidents | 1 |
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile | 0.02 |
Involving DUI | 100.00% |
This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.
Total Sex Offenders | 22 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex Offenders per Square Mile | 1.94 | ||||||||
Closest Sex Offender (mi) | 0.33 | ||||||||
Conviction Type | |||||||||
Offense Against Children | 17 | ||||||||
Rape | 0 | ||||||||
Sexual Battery | 3 | ||||||||
Other Offense | 2 |
In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.
On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.
Main District | Fort Bend ISD |
---|---|
Grade Range | PK-12 |
Number of Schools | 85 |
Number of Students | 79,660 |
Student/Teacher Ratio | 16.59 |
State Rank | 397 out of 968 |
State Rank Percentile | 58.99% |
Other Nearby Districts | Alvin ISD |
Name | Level | District | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lula Belle Goodman Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 1.53 | 721 | 30.75% | 15.90 | 87.38% | 0.83% | 63.38% | 32.45% | 0.14% |
Savannah Lakes Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 2.03 | 809 | 48.91% | 15.40 | 54.39% | 7.29% | 28.06% | 52.66% | 5.93% |
Dr Ronald E McNair J H | Middle (6-8) | Alvin ISD | 2.06 | 1,012 | 93.95% | 16.30 | 26.58% | 15.61% | 19.76% | 34.88% | 25.10% |
Walter Moses Burton Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 2.18 | 451 | 9.36% | 13.80 | 80.93% | 1.77% | 26.39% | 63.19% | 3.33% |
Glenn York Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 2.29 | 834 | 95.44% | 16.10 | 23.02% | 14.99% | 21.94% | 27.70% | 27.34% |
Rosa Parks Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 2.40 | 651 | 14.48% | 15.90 | 75.88% | 2.30% | 30.26% | 62.06% | 1.84% |
Don Jeter Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 2.65 | 822 | 48.42% | 15.30 | 70.44% | 5.84% | 55.47% | 29.81% | 6.93% |
Shirley Dill Brothers Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 2.66 | 732 | 94.00% | 15.30 | 18.85% | 18.85% | 15.44% | 28.83% | 31.15% |
Shadow Creek High School | High (9-12) | Alvin ISD | 2.73 | 2,584 | 74.45% | 17.30 | 31.35% | 11.61% | 18.00% | 42.88% | 24.30% |
Pomona Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 2.84 | 806 | 86.44% | 15.70 | 28.04% | 17.37% | 18.49% | 41.44% | 17.12% |
Laura Ingalls Wilder Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 2.92 | 700 | 83.56% | 17.50 | 32.43% | 17.43% | 15.14% | 41.43% | 20.14% |
Hightower High School | High (8-12) | Fort Bend ISD | 3.07 | 2,535 | 30.49% | 17.40 | 66.67% | 1.78% | 30.26% | 58.26% | 6.98% |
Rodeo Palms J H | Middle (6-8) | Alvin ISD | 3.07 | 816 | 57.34% | 14.30 | 59.07% | 5.27% | 41.18% | 43.14% | 7.11% |
Red Duke Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 3.09 | 612 | 81.60% | 15.10 | 41.99% | 15.85% | 30.07% | 30.88% | 19.28% |
Blue Ridge Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 3.39 | 263 | 10.82% | 10.40 | 88.59% | 1.90% | 29.28% | 64.26% | 0.38% |
Ridgemont Elementary | Elementary (1-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 3.56 | 332 | 21.69% | 11.70 | 95.48% | 3.01% | 66.87% | 28.92% | 0.00% |
Ridgemont Early Literacy Center | Elementary (PK-1) | Fort Bend ISD | 3.59 | 463 | - | 10.80 | 93.95% | 2.38% | 60.26% | 34.77% | 0.00% |
Christa McAuliffe Middle | Middle (6-8) | Fort Bend ISD | 3.66 | 835 | 6.57% | 16.80 | 94.13% | 0.96% | 50.66% | 45.51% | 0.48% |
Willowridge High School | High (8-12) | Fort Bend ISD | 3.88 | 1,319 | 17.08% | 14.00 | 87.04% | 1.06% | 53.68% | 43.21% | 0.30% |
Mary Burks Marek Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Alvin ISD | 3.95 | 705 | 86.98% | 15.60 | 44.82% | 11.63% | 25.53% | 40.99% | 15.89% |
Nolan Ryan J H | Middle (6-8) | Alvin ISD | 4.07 | 850 | 81.80% | 17.60 | 36.82% | 12.35% | 19.29% | 41.41% | 22.47% |
Heritage Rose Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 4.08 | 1,209 | 19.50% | 16.40 | 82.63% | 4.05% | 60.05% | 28.87% | 3.47% |
Ridgegate Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 4.32 | 449 | 34.50% | 11.80 | 98.00% | 0.45% | 71.05% | 27.62% | 0.00% |
Ferndell Henry Center For Learning | High (6-12) | Fort Bend ISD | 4.58 | 188 | - | 7.30 | 79.26% | 7.98% | 34.04% | 44.15% | 8.51% |
Sienna Crossing Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 4.67 | 937 | 95.16% | 15.50 | 18.04% | 34.26% | 16.86% | 18.36% | 23.16% |
Briargate Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 4.79 | 345 | 7.81% | 12.30 | 91.88% | 0.87% | 26.38% | 68.99% | 0.29% |
Lantern Lane Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Fort Bend ISD | 5.40 | 472 | 17.99% | 14.20 | 76.91% | 7.42% | 29.24% | 51.91% | 6.36% |
Billy Baines Middle | Middle (6-8) | Fort Bend ISD | 5.47 | 1,296 | 77.30% | 18.00 | 36.65% | 20.83% | 27.78% | 23.07% | 23.84% |
Ridge Point High School | High (9-12) | Fort Bend ISD | 5.49 | 3,170 | 75.06% | 19.60 | 30.79% | 28.33% | 27.13% | 24.51% | 15.21% |
For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:
The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.
Name | Level | Type | Faith Affiliation | Coed | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bright Learners Academy | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.94 | 34 | - | 2.60 | - | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.24% | 0.00% |
Silverline Montessori School - Shadow Creek | Private (K-5) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 3.44 | 108 | - | 7.90 | - | 16.67% | 18.52% | 32.41% | 23.15% |
Pearland Heritage Christian Academy | Private (PK-4) | Private | Christian (no specific denomination) | Coed | 3.53 | 96 | - | 3.40 | - | 8.33% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.08% |
Primrose School Of West Pearland | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 4.08 | 130 | - | 10.00 | - | 3.08% | 0.00% | 1.54% | 0.77% |
Yes Prep - Southwest | High (6-12) | Charter | - | - | 4.63 | 1,027 | 74.50% | 17.60 | 88.70% | 0.39% | 95.13% | 4.38% | 0.00% |
Montessori School Of Downtown Silverlake | Private (PK-1) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 4.92 | 142 | - | 16.00 | - | 2.82% | 2.82% | 7.75% | 7.04% |
Primrose School Of Sienna | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 5.08 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Divine Savior Academy - Sienna Plantation | Private (PK-9) | Private | Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod | Coed | 5.40 | 201 | - | 15.20 | - | 44.28% | 18.91% | 9.95% | 7.96% |
Montessori School Of Sugar Land Sienna | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 5.59 | 107 | - | 2.00 | - | 1.87% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.93% |
Excel Adventist Academy | Private (PK-8) | Private | Seventh-Day Adventist | Coed | 5.62 | 46 | - | 7.10 | - | 0.00% | 10.87% | 63.04% | 2.17% |
Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.
Poor or Very Poor Air Quality | 2.85% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worst Month | September | ||||||||
Major Pollutant | O3 | ||||||||
Pollutants | |||||||||
Bad or Very Bad SO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad NO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM10 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad O3 | 0.27% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad CO | 0.00% |
A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.
Sound Score | 75 (Active) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Noise | |||||||||
Airports | Calm | ||||||||
Vehicular Traffic | Active | ||||||||
Local Commercial and Community | Calm |
Using Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS), this section forecasts the potential earthquake impact and damage likelihood in the area over the next 50 years, offering vital insights into seismic risks.
PGA | 0.03 |
---|---|
Earthquake Risk | No Risk |
The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.
On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:
Has High-Risk Zones | Yes |
---|---|
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) | 0.20 |
Has Moderate-Risk Zones | Yes |
The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.
Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.
Walk Score® | 17 (Car-Dependent) |
---|---|
Bike Score® | 30 (Somewhat Bikeable) |
Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.
Marrital Status | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single, Never Married | 30.88% | ||||||||
Married | 59.16% | ||||||||
Other | 9.96% | ||||||||
Female to Male Ratio | 1.00 |
Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.
Has Any Pet | 53.88% |
---|---|
Has Dog(s) | 45.27% |
Has Cat(s) | 19.32% |
Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.
On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:
2020 Presidential Election Results | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Biden | 76.06% | ||||||||
Donald Trump | 22.78% |
Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.
Very Liberal | 14.56% |
---|---|
Somewhat Liberal | 25.10% |
Somewhat Conservative | 36.28% |
Very Conservative | 24.06% |
Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.
Median Home Value | 330,000 |
---|---|
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value | 358,102 |
5-Year Appreciation Forecast | 8.52% |
Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.
Median Monthly Rent | 1,464 |
---|---|
Median Home Value | 330,000 |
Rent to Value Ratio | 0.44% |
The Desirability Score measures how closely an area approaches a "perfect" neighborhood. This ideal is characterized by no crime or safety concerns, top-tier schools, a highly-educated population, no noise or air pollution, no risk of earthquakes or floods, high walkability, and a harmonious mix of nature and development.
The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating closer alignment to this ideal.
Desirability Score | 66.08 |
---|
The Bang for the Buck Index measures the ratio of the expected cost of a neighborhood based on its characteristics to its actual cost. An index close to 1 implies that the neighborhood's value is on par with its qualities.
An index greater than 1 indicates that the area offers excellent value for what it provides, while an index less than 1 suggests that the area may be overpriced.
Note that this measure is estimated relative to the entire US housing market, not just the local market.
Bang for the Buck | 88.67 |
---|
Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.