This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Georgian Acres

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.74-mi Radius 07/28/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Roots: Georgian Acres is a neighborhood with a rich history dating back to the mid-20th century, characterized by its older homes and established community vibe.
  • Diverse Demographics: The area is a melting pot of cultures, with a significant Hispanic population making up 63% of residents, contributing to a vibrant cultural scene.
  • Community Events: The neighborhood is known for its lively community events, including local festivals and cultural celebrations that bring residents together.

Suitability

  • Young Professionals: With a median age of 33.1 years and a high percentage of young adults (38%), Georgian Acres is ideal for young professionals seeking a dynamic and diverse community.
  • Families with Children: Families with children might find the area less appealing due to the high property and personal crime indices, as well as the moderate school district ranking (41st percentile).
  • Renters: With 76% of the housing being renter-occupied and a median monthly rent of $1,414, this neighborhood is particularly suitable for renters looking for affordable living options.

The Positive

  • Cultural Diversity: The neighborhood's diverse racial and ethnic composition fosters a rich cultural environment, offering a variety of cultural experiences and cuisines.
  • Proximity to Amenities: With a Walk Score of 55 and a Transit Score of 48, residents have decent access to amenities and public transportation, making daily commutes and errands manageable.
  • Future Home Value Appreciation: The 5-year home value appreciation forecast of 8.73% suggests a promising investment opportunity for potential homeowners.

The Negative

  • High Crime Rates: The property crime index of 183 and personal crime index of 202 are significantly above the national average, which may be a concern for safety-conscious residents.
  • Low Owner Occupancy: With only 16% of homes being owner-occupied, there may be less community stability and investment compared to areas with higher owner occupancy rates.
  • Flood Risk: The high flood risk, including zones with a 1% annual chance of flood, could pose significant challenges and additional costs for homeowners and renters alike.

Alternatives

  • North Loop : Located just a few miles south, North Loop offers a similar cultural vibe but with a lower crime rate and better school district rankings, making it more suitable for families.
  • Crestview : This neighborhood provides a quieter, more suburban feel with higher owner occupancy rates and a stronger sense of community, ideal for those seeking stability.
  • Windsor Park : Known for its mid-century homes and active community association, Windsor Park offers a balanced mix of affordability, safety, and community engagement, appealing to a wide range of residents.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

32/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

34/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 13,870
Population (5-Year Projection) 13,864
5-Year Growth Forecast -0.04%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 8,064
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 5,652
Average Household Size 2.45
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 23.73%
Families without Kids 24.58%
Non-Families 51.70%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 33.10
Age Groups
0-9 Years 14.10%
10-19 Years 11.76%
20-34 Years 28.22%
35-49 Years 24.25%
50-64 Years 14.68%
65+ Years 6.99%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 19.63%
Hispanic 62.80%
Black/African American 10.56%
Asian 3.79%
Other 3.22%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 14.59
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 17.78%
High School or Some College 44.12%
College Degree 28.72%
Graduate/Professional Degree 9.37%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $52,200
On Food Stamps/SNAP 18.56%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 27.32%
$25K-$50K 19.99%
$50K-$100K 34.36%
$100K-$200K 16.56%
$200K+ 1.75%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 6,169
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 15.59%
Renter Occupied 76.03%
Vacant 8.38%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1976
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 4.04%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 33.85%
Old (Before 1980) 62.12%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 5
Closest Property (mi) 0.23
Total Units 964
Units per Square Mile 560.47
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 3 (312 Units)
LIHTC 2 (652 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 9.95%
Residential Areas 47.40%
Urban & Commercial 40.82%
Water Bodies 0.02%
Wooded Areas 0.90%
Wild Vegetation 0.00%
Farms & Gardens 0.00%
Marshes & Swamps 0.92%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 186
Property Crime Index 183
Personal Crime Index 202

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 11
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 1.60
Involving DUI 27.27%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 52
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 30.23
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.20
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 36
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 10
Other Offense 6
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 GERARDO ARTHUR MATA
8212 SAM RAYBURN DR APT #104, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.20 mi Offense Against Children
2 ALEJANDRO ARREDONDO
124 BOLLES CIR APT #124A, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.21 mi Offense Against Children
3 JAMES EDWARD THOMAS
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #201, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
4 LAVERN JR BLACKWELL
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #108, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
5 JOHN HERBERT PETZOLD
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #212, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
6 STEVEN RAY ALVAREZ
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
7 MARK CLEMMER
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Other Offense
8 AMOS CHAIRS
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #204, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Sexual Battery
9 STEVEN MICHAEL MILLER
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Sexual Battery
10 FREDRICK BLACK
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #110, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Sexual Battery
11 CHARLES PATRICK HAYNES
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
12 JOSEPH PEARSON QUANDER
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
13 VIRGIL KEVIN WILSON
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Sexual Battery
14 FABIAN BOBBY LOPEZ
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #208, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
15 RODNEY LEE
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #206, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
16 LINNIE CARL HOLT
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #207, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
17 VICTOR A ARNOLD
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #211, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.22 mi Offense Against Children
18 DARRELL JEROME JOHNSON
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #106, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
19 BOBBIE BROWN
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #104, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Other Offense
20 ARAM LU VILLANUEVABLASSINGAME
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
21 KEITH ANTHONY LEWIS
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #211, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
22 MARCOS CASTILLO
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #102, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
23 CHARLES WILLIAM HORNSBY
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #202, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
24 FREDDIE LEE HARRIS
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Other Offense
25 JIMMY EUGENE WALKER
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #101, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
26 SANTOS SILVA
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #100, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
27 RICKY ALLEN FOSTER
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #202, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Other Offense
28 DERRICK HAROLD KINDRED
8201 SAM RAYBURN DR APT #B, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
29 GREGORY LEE MC-COY
408 E WONSLEY DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
30 ANDY SALDIVAR HERNANDEZ
303 JOHN NANCE GARNER CIR APT #109, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
31 JOSE ASUNCION PIZANA
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #209, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
32 ROBERT SALDANA
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #112, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
33 ROBERT ORAL COX
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #203, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
34 RICHARD LEE YEAKLE
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #110, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
35 AMBROCIO VARGAS SOLIS
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #208, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
36 JUSTIN NICHOLSON
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #106, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
37 BRYAN SCOTT OUTMAN
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #103, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
38 CECILIO GUILLERMO REYES
408 E WONSLEY DR APT #106, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.23 mi Offense Against Children
39 CHRISTOPHER ROCHON BUNKLEY
8033 GESSNER DR APT #235, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.24 mi Offense Against Children
40 MARCOS ARIEL VAQUENDANOMIGUEL
8411 GEORGIAN DR, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.26 mi Offense Against Children
41 JOHN MICHAEL ESTRADA
611 W POWELL LN APT #A12, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.28 mi Offense Against Children
42 JEFFERY D BROADWAY
8128 N INTERSTATE HWY 35 APT #334, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.39 mi Offense Against Children
43 ZACHARY D HARRIS
8210 N I 35 APT #8104, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
44 GABRIEL ALLEN OLIVAS
8312 I-35 APT #180, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
45 MARCOS A CARRILLO
8608 DUNGAN ST, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
46 HUMBERTO VALDEZ
7704 EASTCREST DR, AUSTIN, TX 78752
0.45 mi Offense Against Children
47 BRION PATRICK MBAH
8548 N LAMAR BLVD APT #3119, AUSTIN, TX 78758
0.51 mi Offense Against Children
48 AARON ANDREW WEBB
600 BARWOOD PARK APT #2233, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.51 mi Other Offense
49 RICHARD ALAN REES
202 PRAIRIE DELL AVE, AUSTIN, TX 78752
0.53 mi Offense Against Children
50 ERIK MARTIN GALVAN-CUEVA
8540 N LAMAR BLVD APT #4102, AUSTIN, TX 78753
0.56 mi Offense Against Children
51 DALE PAUL KEYSER
8429 BANGOR BEND, AUSTIN, TX 78758
0.59 mi Other Offense
52 EUGENE SHIER
8429 BANGOR BEND, AUSTIN, TX 78758
0.59 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Austin ISD
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 119
Number of Students 73,384
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.55
State Rank 568 out of 968
State Rank Percentile 41.32%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Brown Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 0.40 486 7.04% 18.00 97.53% 5.35% 79.42% 7.20% 7.00%
Hart Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 0.93 531 33.18% 17.50 93.41% 2.64% 87.76% 6.40% 1.51%
Graduation Prep Academy Navarro High (9-12) Austin ISD 0.95 58 3.88% 16.60 82.76% 5.17% 81.03% 10.34% 0.00%
Navarro Early College High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 0.95 1,649 13.67% 16.70 87.51% 2.73% 89.57% 5.70% 1.52%
Webb Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 1.01 571 2.49% 16.80 97.02% 3.85% 86.51% 7.71% 1.58%
Wooten Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.05 347 23.93% 13.80 93.66% 7.78% 84.44% 5.48% 0.86%
Barrington Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.05 345 20.10% 11.80 95.36% 3.77% 85.51% 6.67% 3.19%
Pickle Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.15 326 33.74% 16.30 96.32% 1.23% 92.02% 4.60% 0.31%
Wooldridge Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.26 456 1.48% 18.60 87.50% 3.51% 86.62% 7.46% 1.54%
Guerrero Thompson Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.32 562 53.37% 17.60 99.11% 2.85% 90.21% 4.63% 2.14%
Dobie Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 1.45 618 1.46% 15.30 96.28% 2.27% 83.50% 10.19% 2.27%
Reilly Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.68 344 68.00% 17.20 36.05% 29.07% 56.69% 1.45% 4.94%
Brentwood Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.75 630 92.53% 18.50 15.56% 64.29% 23.17% 2.22% 3.17%
Northeast Early College High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 1.77 1,019 8.92% 16.70 92.54% 3.53% 83.81% 10.30% 1.47%
Burnet Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 1.79 799 2.70% 16.10 98.12% 2.25% 90.49% 5.51% 1.00%
Padron Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.08 574 11.06% 18.10 95.30% 0.35% 93.03% 4.88% 1.39%
Cook Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.10 446 37.96% 14.30 93.95% 4.71% 89.01% 3.36% 0.67%
McCallum High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 2.14 1,824 88.17% 18.60 22.92% 57.73% 28.95% 6.03% 2.08%
Lamar Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 2.32 1,182 90.90% 20.10 21.32% 57.95% 31.13% 3.47% 2.03%
Pillow Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.33 386 12.89% 20.30 75.65% 15.03% 62.18% 13.21% 5.70%
Harris Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.37 373 10.57% 14.30 89.81% 3.75% 80.16% 13.14% 1.07%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Cedars International Academy Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 0.47 382 19.07% 12.10 80.89% 4.45% 84.03% 7.85% 0.00%
Greenleaf Ncc High (12) Charter - - 0.68 14 - - 21.43% 71.43% 7.14% 14.29% 7.14%
The Excel Center (For Adults) High (9-12) Charter - - 0.78 475 14.02% 22.50 - 8.84% 61.47% 24.84% 1.89%
Redeemer Lutheran School Private (PK-8) Private Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod Coed 1.12 547 - 12.50 - 46.62% 9.87% 3.11% 2.01%
St Francis School Private (12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.20 376 - 7.70 - 31.12% 3.72% 3.72% 25.00%
Harmony Science Academy - Austin Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 1.30 687 4.17% 14.70 98.11% 3.78% 89.81% 3.49% 2.18%
Idea Rundberg Academy Elementary (K-5) Charter - - 1.31 682 46.05% 22.00 96.48% 3.08% 89.30% 7.04% 0.15%
Idea Rundberg College Preparatory High (6-12) Charter - - 1.31 747 86.84% 15.50 97.05% 2.81% 93.98% 2.81% 0.27%
KIPP Austin College Prep Middle (5-8) Charter - - 1.31 466 17.60% 15.70 90.34% 1.93% 93.99% 3.22% 0.21%
KIPP Austin Collegiate High (9-12) Charter - - 1.31 826 38.91% 11.70 88.50% 0.97% 94.67% 3.39% 0.36%
KIPP Austin Comunidad Elementary (PK-4) Charter - - 1.31 556 41.51% 16.30 89.21% 3.96% 87.05% 7.01% 0.36%
Settlement Home High (8-12) Charter - - 1.36 28 29.58% 5.60 - 39.29% 42.86% 14.29% 0.00%
Cedars Academy Next Generation H S At Highland High (9-12) Charter - - 1.40 111 51.96% 7.40 65.77% 15.32% 74.77% 7.21% 0.00%
St Louis Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.69 262 - 11.90 - 35.50% 43.51% 3.44% 8.02%
Founders Classical Academy-Austin North Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 1.72 149 7.85% 9.30 43.62% 25.50% 43.62% 16.11% 7.38%
Academy Of Thought And Industry Austin Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.81 52 - 5.30 - 76.92% 9.62% 7.69% 5.77%
Greater Calvary Academy Private (K-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.12 7 - 2.30 - 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Austin Achieve Northeast Elementary Elementary (PK-4) Charter - - 2.13 1,008 11.30% 16.10 90.97% 2.78% 80.56% 14.88% 0.50%
Austin Achieve High School High (9-12) Charter - - 2.13 645 28.45% 16.60 94.42% 2.17% 92.25% 5.12% 0.16%
Austin Achieve Ferguson Prekindergarten (PK) Charter - - 2.14 0 - - - - - - -
Austin Achieve Pflugerville Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 2.15 171 18.42% 10.60 93.57% 1.75% 64.33% 32.75% 0.00%
Ascent: An Acton Academy Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.21 65 - 9.10 - 72.31% 0.00% 3.08% 9.23%
Northwest Montessori House, Inc Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.25 52 - 7.00 - 36.54% 9.62% 5.77% 1.92%
Capitol School Of Austin Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.32 64 - 5.30 - 42.19% 15.62% 0.00% 3.12%
Texas Preparatory School - Austin Campus Elementary (K-6) Charter - - 2.46 42 7.77% 5.10 47.62% 2.38% 33.33% 47.62% 0.00%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CITY OF AUSTIN WATER & WASTEWATER
Water Health Score 4.05 / 5 Good
Population Served 1,115,323
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 5
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.50%
Worst Month September
Major Pollutant SO2
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 13
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 4
Transport 3
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 70 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.03
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: A, AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.48
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 55 (Somewhat Walkable)
Bike Score® -

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 49.05%
Married 35.06%
Other 15.89%
Female to Male Ratio 0.78

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 34.36%
Has Dog(s) 24.45%
Has Cat(s) 15.71%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 83.27%
Donald Trump 14.62%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 23.66%
Somewhat Liberal 29.44%
Somewhat Conservative 25.85%
Very Conservative 21.05%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 429,585
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 467,098
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 8.73%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,414
Median Home Value 429,585
Rent to Value Ratio 0.33%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.