This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Greenslope Drive

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
2.00-mi Radius 09/12/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Overview: Westover Hills is one of Austin's established neighborhoods, known for its mid-century modern homes and lush, tree-lined streets.
  • Notable Residents: The area has been home to several local celebrities, including musicians and tech entrepreneurs, reflecting Austin's vibrant cultural and tech scenes.
  • Architectural Style: The neighborhood features a mix of architectural styles, with a significant number of homes built in the 1970s and 1980s, showcasing classic ranch-style and contemporary designs.
  • Community Events: Westover Hills hosts an annual neighborhood picnic that brings residents together for food, games, and community bonding.

Suitability

  • Diverse Cultural Preference: With 39% of the population being non-White, the area offers a reasonable level of diversity, which aligns well with your cultural preference.
  • Serene/Natural Scenery: The neighborhood boasts 12% landscaped areas and 17% wooded areas, providing a serene and natural environment that matches your scenery preference.
  • Liberal Political Climate: The area is predominantly liberal, with 75% of votes going to Biden in the 2020 election, aligning well with your political preference.
  • Young Adult Demographic: With 38% of the population being young adults (20-39), you'll find a community of peers, which is ideal for a young couple.
  • Safety Concerns: The property crime index is significantly higher than the national average (197 vs. 100), which could be a concern for safety.
  • Overall Conclusion: Westover Hills is a good match for your preferences in diversity, scenery, and political climate. However, the higher property crime rate is a notable drawback.

The Positive

  • High Education Levels: With 71% of residents holding a college or graduate degree, the area is highly educated, fostering a knowledgeable and engaged community.
  • Strong Rental Market: With 54% of housing units being renter-occupied, you'll find a robust rental market, making it easier to find suitable rental properties.
  • Natural Beauty: The 17% wooded areas and 12% landscaped areas offer plenty of green spaces for outdoor activities and relaxation.
  • Economic Stability: The median household income of $84,949 and a relatively low unemployment rate of 4.75% indicate a stable and prosperous community.

The Negative

  • High Property Crime Rate: The property crime index of 197 is nearly double the national average, which could be a significant concern for safety.
  • Older Housing Stock: With 53.83% of buildings constructed before 1980, you might encounter older homes that require more maintenance and updates.
  • Limited Public Transit: The transit score of 26/100 indicates limited public transportation options, making it less convenient if you rely on public transit.
  • Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could impact property values and insurance costs.

Alternatives

  • Hyde Park : Located just north of the University of Texas, Hyde Park offers a similar liberal and diverse community with a higher walk score and more historic homes. However, it may come with higher rental prices.
  • Mueller : This master-planned community offers modern amenities, a high level of diversity, and excellent green spaces. It also has better public transit options but might be more expensive.
  • South Lamar : Known for its vibrant cultural scene and proximity to downtown Austin, South Lamar offers a liberal atmosphere and a mix of old and new housing. However, it may have higher traffic and noise levels.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

55/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

45/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 41,456
Population (5-Year Projection) 40,818
5-Year Growth Forecast -1.54%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 3,298
Density Level Medium

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 21,299
Average Household Size 1.95
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 22.57%
Families without Kids 23.53%
Non-Families 53.90%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 36.50
Age Groups
0-9 Years 9.19%
10-19 Years 8.75%
20-34 Years 29.40%
35-49 Years 22.44%
50-64 Years 15.32%
65+ Years 14.90%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 61.16%
Hispanic 20.50%
Black/African American 3.44%
Asian 9.75%
Other 5.16%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 16.81
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 4.42%
High School or Some College 24.61%
College Degree 40.28%
Graduate/Professional Degree 30.69%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $84,900
On Food Stamps/SNAP 3.73%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 11.63%
$25K-$50K 15.21%
$50K-$100K 29.40%
$100K-$200K 22.63%
$200K+ 21.12%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 74.24%
Unemployment Rate 4.75%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 23,200
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 38.12%
Renter Occupied 53.69%
Vacant 8.19%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1978
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.08%
Recent (2010-2019) 6.17%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 39.92%
Old (Before 1980) 53.83%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 1
Closest Property (mi) 1.16
Total Units 104
Units per Square Mile 8.27
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 1 (104 Units)
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 12.44%
Residential Areas 45.26%
Urban & Commercial 24.15%
Water Bodies 0.14%
Wooded Areas 17.27%
Wild Vegetation 0.40%
Farms & Gardens 0.01%
Marshes & Swamps 0.32%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 182
Property Crime Index 197
Personal Crime Index 98

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 16
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.32
Involving DUI 25.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 21
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 1.67
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.54
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 14
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 3
Other Offense 4
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 Demetrius Le'Van Smith
4159 STECK AVE 235, AUSTIN, TX 78759
0.54 mi Offense Against Children
2 MATTHEW TODD HULL
4102 VILLACLIFF CIR, AUSTIN, TX 78759
0.74 mi Offense Against Children
3 MICHAEL PAUL MCCARTY
3801 S GREEN TRAIL, AUSTIN, TX 78731
0.86 mi Other Offense
4 RICHARD FRANK GEYER
8113 ROCKWOOD LANE, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.08 mi Offense Against Children
5 RICHARD F GEYER
8113 ROCKWOOD LN, AUSTIN, TX 78757-8022
1.08 mi Offense Against Children
6 TOBY JR PORTILLO
8541 N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY APT #1081, AUSTIN, TX 78759
1.10 mi Other Offense
7 MATTHEW ANTHONY CULLEN
9701 STONELAKE BLVD ROOM 318, AUSTIN, TX 78759
1.15 mi Offense Against Children
8 LARRY LOPEZ MOLINA
9701 STONELAKE BLVD APT #304, AUSTIN, TX 78759
1.21 mi Offense Against Children
9 FRANK DAVID OCHOA
2602 PENNY LN APT #110, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.24 mi Offense Against Children
10 GREGORY JEFFERSON
7205 HART LN APT #324, AUSTIN, TX 78731
1.30 mi Offense Against Children
11 MARTIN CHRISTOPHER WETZEL
2600 PENNY LA APT #121, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.30 mi Offense Against Children
12 DAVID CORONADO
2301 POLARIS AVE APT #104, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.39 mi Sexual Battery
13 JAMES FRANK JOHANNES
2425 ASHDALE DR APT #96, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.48 mi Offense Against Children
14 SHELDON JOHNSON
8701 BLUFFSTONE COVE APT #11301, AUSTIN, TX 78759
1.55 mi Sexual Battery
15 DAVID CHRISTOPHER WINKLER
8105 EXMOOR DR APT #A, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.62 mi Other Offense
16 NORMAN WAYNE LESIKAR
8625 FIRESIDE DR APT #A7, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.63 mi Offense Against Children
17 CHRISTOPHER NICHOLAS
8102 FALMOUTH DR, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.65 mi Offense Against Children
18 TALLION KYLE TAYLOR
2105 WOOTEN DR, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.70 mi Offense Against Children
19 JACOB ISAAC WALKER
3533 N HILLS DR APT #C, AUSTIN, TX 78731
1.71 mi Sexual Battery
20 HANS J MAVERICK
9512 GOLDEN HILLS CIR, AUSTIN, TX 78759
1.81 mi Offense Against Children
21 ANDREW GREGORY CAUSEY
1801 OHLEN RD, AUSTIN, TX 78757
1.89 mi Other Offense

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Austin ISD
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 119
Number of Students 73,384
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.55
State Rank 554 out of 968
State Rank Percentile 42.77%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Hill Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 0.15 842 91.49% 16.10 15.20% 60.57% 21.50% 3.92% 6.65%
Anderson High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 0.29 2,210 79.67% 18.60 24.43% 53.71% 29.10% 3.80% 7.74%
Pillow Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.01 386 8.11% 20.30 75.65% 15.03% 62.18% 13.21% 5.70%
Murchison Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 1.51 1,237 75.90% 19.40 27.41% 55.46% 26.27% 4.61% 8.16%
Doss Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.51 860 96.45% 16.20 18.26% 58.02% 19.88% 2.33% 11.74%
Burnet Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 1.54 799 3.73% 16.10 98.12% 2.25% 90.49% 5.51% 1.00%
Padron Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.72 574 2.82% 18.10 95.30% 0.35% 93.03% 4.88% 1.39%
Gullett Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.11 565 92.24% 14.80 6.37% 72.57% 15.22% 0.71% 3.01%
Wooten Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.28 347 39.38% 13.80 93.66% 7.78% 84.44% 5.48% 0.86%
Wooldridge Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.43 456 1.54% 18.60 87.50% 3.51% 86.62% 7.46% 1.54%
Lamar Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 2.59 1,182 91.15% 20.10 21.32% 57.95% 31.13% 3.47% 2.03%
Brentwood Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.60 630 94.33% 18.50 15.56% 64.29% 23.17% 2.22% 3.17%
Navarro Early College High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 2.62 1,649 10.37% 16.70 87.51% 2.73% 89.57% 5.70% 1.52%
Graduation Prep Academy Navarro High (9-12) Austin ISD 2.62 58 6.09% 16.60 82.76% 5.17% 81.03% 10.34% 0.00%
Cook Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.65 446 12.34% 14.30 93.95% 4.71% 89.01% 3.36% 0.67%
Highland Park Elementary Elementary (K-5) Austin ISD 3.09 638 96.75% 16.10 6.11% 71.32% 16.77% 0.63% 4.70%
Davis Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 3.10 651 70.44% 16.60 31.18% 51.77% 24.73% 6.30% 11.37%
Brown Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 3.14 486 5.93% 18.00 97.53% 5.35% 79.42% 7.20% 7.00%
Barrington Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 3.31 345 3.87% 11.80 95.36% 3.77% 85.51% 6.67% 3.19%
McCallum High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 3.50 1,824 89.88% 18.60 22.92% 57.73% 28.95% 6.03% 2.08%
Guerrero Thompson Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 3.50 562 60.90% 17.60 99.11% 2.85% 90.21% 4.63% 2.14%
McBee Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 3.51 344 16.68% 14.40 96.80% 2.91% 94.19% 2.33% 0.00%
Summitt Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 3.53 760 89.99% 15.20 32.50% 37.76% 22.37% 4.47% 25.66%
Reilly Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 3.65 344 86.99% 17.20 36.05% 29.07% 56.69% 1.45% 4.94%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Casner Christian Academy Private (PK-K) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 0.10 88 - 16.00 - 18.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
St Matthew's Episcopal School Private (PK-K) Private Episcopal Coed 0.43 165 - 8.00 - 9.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Bais Menachem Hebrew Academy Private (K-5) Private Jewish Coed 0.50 18 - 2.40 - 77.78% 22.22% 0.00% 0.00%
The Magellan International School Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.88 532 - 6.70 - 30.45% 11.47% 2.26% 7.52%
Austin Jewish Academy Private (K-8) Private Jewish Coed 1.21 128 - 5.50 - 82.81% 10.16% 0.78% 5.47%
St Louis Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.86 262 - 11.90 - 35.50% 43.51% 3.44% 8.02%
Settlement Home High (8-12) Charter - - 2.22 28 50.13% 5.60 - 39.29% 42.86% 14.29% 0.00%
Redeemer Lutheran School Private (PK-8) Private Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod Coed 2.27 547 - 12.50 - 46.62% 9.87% 3.11% 2.01%
International Montessori House Of Children Private (K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.28 6 - 1.20 - 0.00% 16.67% 33.33% 0.00%
Hyde Park Schools Private (PK-12) Private Baptist Coed 2.55 765 - 10.60 - 89.41% 3.79% 1.96% 1.18%
St Theresas Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.63 327 - 9.00 - 61.16% 20.49% 0.31% 1.22%
Basis Austin Pri Elementary (K-2) Charter - - 2.78 186 - 13.40 - 5.38% 3.76% 3.23% 76.34%
Basis Austin Middle (3-8) Charter - - 2.78 273 96.99% 14.40 - 5.86% 6.23% 1.10% 83.15%
Greenleaf Ncc High (12) Charter - - 2.79 14 - - 21.43% 71.43% 7.14% 14.29% 7.14%
Paragon Preparatory Inc Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.82 181 - 5.60 - 64.09% 4.97% 1.66% 18.23%
Capitol School Of Austin Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.84 64 - 5.30 - 42.19% 15.62% 0.00% 3.12%
Northwest Montessori House, Inc Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.92 52 - 7.00 - 36.54% 9.62% 5.77% 1.92%
Williams Community School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.96 54 - 6.20 - 66.67% 12.96% 0.00% 9.26%
Harmony School Of Science - Austin Elementary (PK-5) Charter - - 3.02 456 76.53% 14.70 56.36% 22.81% 26.32% 22.59% 26.32%
Hawthorne Montessori School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.07 71 - 6.00 - 4.23% 2.82% 0.00% 0.00%
Cedars International Academy Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 3.68 382 24.21% 12.10 80.89% 4.45% 84.03% 7.85% 0.00%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CITY OF AUSTIN WATER & WASTEWATER
Water Health Score 4.05 / 5 Good
Population Served 1,115,323
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 5
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.35%
Worst Month September
Major Pollutant -
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 72
High-Risk Sites 4
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.32
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.94
Facility Types
Active 24
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 3
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 1

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 76 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.03
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, A)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.59
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 48 (Car-Dependent)
Bike Score® 56 (Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 40.59%
Married 44.29%
Other 15.12%
Female to Male Ratio 0.89

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 40.20%
Has Dog(s) 27.13%
Has Cat(s) 18.22%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 75.15%
Donald Trump 22.74%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 29.04%
Somewhat Liberal 37.34%
Somewhat Conservative 21.51%
Very Conservative 12.12%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 730,599
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 765,222
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 4.74%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,810
Median Home Value 730,599
Rent to Value Ratio 0.25%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.