This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:
Address | Surroundings | Created on |
---|---|---|
Custom Shape | 06/09/2024 |
A Historical and Modern Overview
The focal point of this study, centered at 800 Howard St in San Francisco, CA, lies within the eclectic and ever-evolving neighborhood of Yerba Buena, ZIP code 94103. Historically, Yerba Buena was part of a larger area known for its maritime roots and association with San Francisco's early settlement period. Over time, the neighborhood has evolved into a significant cultural and commercial hub. Known for landmarks such as the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts and Moscone Convention Center, the area is synonymous with high-energy urban lifestyle, innovation hubs, cutting-edge retail spaces, and a vibrant mix of historical sites blended seamlessly with modern high-rises.
Drawn to the Bright Side
The area holds several attractive features for prospective residents, starting with a robust 5-year population growth forecast of 4.20%, suggesting a thriving and dynamic community. Population density measures at a staggering 47,381 persons per square mile, indicative of a bustling urban atmosphere with a high concentration of amenities and services. Educational attainment rates are impressive, with 55% of residents holding college or graduate degrees, potentially signifying a highly educated workforce and promising intellectual community.
An urban dweller's dream, the area's transportation scores are near perfect: a Walk Score of 98/100 (Walker's Paradise), Bike Score of 85/100 (Very Bikeable), and Transit Score of 100/100 (Rider's Paradise). Excellent connectivity is underscored by access to numerous bus (88 routes) and rail lines, enhancing daily commutes and leisure travel.
Moreover, the median household income stands at $80,413 and the area boasts a substantial proportion (25%) of households earning above $200,000 annually. This financial vigor reinforces Yerba Buena's standing as a locale for affluence and opportunity. The demographic diversity also shines through with a significant Asian population (36%), fostering a rich cultural tapestry.
Dark Spots in the Canvas
However, certain potential drawbacks are worthy of consideration. With property and personal crime indices well above national averages (256 and 216 respectively), safety remains a critical issue. Registered sex offenders per square mile number 112.96, necessitating heightened vigilance and community awareness. Annual fatal car accidents per square mile are also disconcertingly high at 2.93.
Regarding housing, the owner occupancy rate is strikingly low at 14%, reflecting a predominantly transient population or reliance on rental properties. The median home value, pegged at a steep $1,284,009, poses substantial barriers to homeownership. This high entry cost is somewhat mitigated by a favorable 5-year value appreciation forecast of 7.55%, suggesting reliable returns on real estate investments. Prospective tenants enjoy relatively affordable median monthly rents of $1,745, but it’s crucial to validate the feasibility of sustained rent payments given the high cost of living.
Environmental factors demand attention too, with the area subject to high earthquake risk and moderate flood hazards. Proactive measures, such as obtaining comprehensive insurance and opting for buildings adhering to stringent seismic safety standards, are prudent.
The Heartbeat of the Community
Beyond the numbers, Yerba Buena hums with activity and cultural vibrancy. The neighborhood boasts iconic establishments such as the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA) and the Contemporary Jewish Museum, offering residents and visitors a rich array of artistic and cultural experiences. Festival highlights include the Yerba Buena Gardens Festival, featuring a calendar brimming with free live performances, from music and dance to theater and spoken word.
Dining and entertainment options also abound, with acclaimed eateries like Benu and Samovar at Yerba Buena Gardens delivering culinary excellence. The local nightlife, characterized by cutting-edge bars and lounges such as The Press Club and SPiN San Francisco, caters to a range of social preferences from relaxed to lively.
Ideal Residents and Alternative Neighborhoods
Yerba Buena is particularly attractive to young professionals, affluent singles, and couples without children, driven by the neighborhood's high density of non-family households (77%) and dynamic socio-economic landscape. Tech workers from nearby SoMa (South of Market) and financial sector employees from the Financial District will find this an especially appealing locale.
Alternative areas offering similar benefits include:
Who Might Find it Challenging?
Families with children, given the low percentage of such households (8%) and relatively high crime rates, might feel out of place. Individuals preferring quieter environments may also find the high density and bustling vibe overwhelming.
Alternative quieter and more family-oriented areas include:
Investment Potential
Yerba Buena presents substantial investment potential, backed by a solid appreciation forecast (7.55%) and socio-economic vibrancy. However, investors should be cognizant of the high property crime rates and the relatively low owner occupancy which may impact long-term stability. Monitoring forthcoming development plans, changes in zoning laws, and shifts in local economic dynamics will be essential for making informed investment choices.
Final Insights
Yerba Buena stands as a compelling choice for those seeking a vibrant urban lifestyle amidst cultural richness and robust economic opportunity. However, those prioritizing safety, quietude, or family-oriented living may need to reconcile their requirements against the neighborhood's inherent characteristics. Meticulous planning and informed decisions, arguably influenced by enlightened local insights and community engagement, will undoubtedly serve to maximize the potential of making Yerba Buena an ideal new home.
Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.
Population | 76,757 |
---|---|
Population (5-Year Projection) | 79,984 |
5-Year Growth Forecast | 4.20% |
Density (Person per Square Mile) | 47,381 |
Density Level | High |
The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.
Number of Households | 40,263 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Household Size | 1.91 | ||||||||
Household Makeup | |||||||||
Families with Kids | 7.59% | ||||||||
Families without Kids | 15.72% | ||||||||
Non-Families | 76.70% |
Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.
Median Age | 41.10 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Groups | |||||||||
0-9 Years | 5.20% | ||||||||
10-19 Years | 5.23% | ||||||||
20-34 Years | 27.84% | ||||||||
35-49 Years | 24.66% | ||||||||
50-64 Years | 19.06% | ||||||||
65+ Years | 18.02% |
This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.
Non-Hispanic White | 30.69% |
---|---|
Hispanic | 17.86% |
Black/African American | 9.20% |
Asian | 35.98% |
Other | 6.27% |
Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.
Average Schooling Years | 15.67 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Attainment Breakdown | |||||||||
Less than High School | 12.70% | ||||||||
High School or Some College | 32.17% | ||||||||
College Degree | 33.79% | ||||||||
Graduate/Professional Degree | 21.34% |
This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.
Median Household Income | $80,400 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Food Stamps/SNAP | 9.28% | ||||||||
Income Brackets | |||||||||
$0-$25K | 26.38% | ||||||||
$25K-$50K | 13.08% | ||||||||
$50K-$100K | 14.87% | ||||||||
$100K-$200K | 20.30% | ||||||||
$200K+ | 25.36% |
Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.
Total Housing Units | 46,909 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupancy | |||||||||
Owner Occupied | 13.79% | ||||||||
Renter Occupied | 72.04% | ||||||||
Vacant | 14.17% |
The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.
Main Types of Subsidized Housing:
In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.
Total Properties | 72 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Closest Property (mi) | 0.04 | ||||||||
Total Units | 6,777 | ||||||||
Units per Square Mile | 4,183.33 | ||||||||
Property Types | |||||||||
Public Housing | - | ||||||||
Section 8 | 18 (1913 Units) | ||||||||
LIHTC | 54 (4864 Units) |
Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.
Concise descriptions for each land cover category:
Landscaped Areas | 1.13% |
---|---|
Residential Areas | 6.72% |
Urban & Commercial | 92.14% |
Water Bodies | 0.00% |
Wooded Areas | 0.00% |
Wild Vegetation | 0.00% |
Farms & Gardens | 0.00% |
Marshes & Swamps | 0.00% |
Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.
Total Crime Index | 250 |
---|---|
Property Crime Index | 256 |
Personal Crime Index | 216 |
Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.
You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:
Data Period | 2019-2022 |
---|---|
All Fatal Accidents | 19 |
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile | 2.93 |
Involving DUI | 5.26% |
This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.
Total Sex Offenders | 183 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex Offenders per Square Mile | 112.96 | ||||||||
Closest Sex Offender (mi) | 0.21 | ||||||||
Conviction Type | |||||||||
Offense Against Children | 94 | ||||||||
Rape | 36 | ||||||||
Sexual Battery | 25 | ||||||||
Other Offense | 28 |
In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.
On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.
Main District | San Francisco Unified School District |
---|---|
Grade Range | K-12 |
Number of Schools | 106 |
Number of Students | 48,785 |
Student/Teacher Ratio | 21.06 |
State Rank | 619 out of 1560 |
State Rank Percentile | 60.32% |
Other Nearby Districts | - |
Name | Level | District | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carmichael (Bessie)/FEC | Elementary (K-8) | San Francisco Unified | 0.50 | 544 | 5.06% | 21.20 | 67.65% | 10.29% | 25.92% | 15.26% | 31.80% |
Lee (Edwin and Anita) Newcomer | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 0.82 | 21 | - | 6.00 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
Lau (Gordon J.) Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 0.84 | 644 | 85.99% | 22.50 | 89.29% | 0.93% | 5.28% | 0.00% | 88.04% |
Stockton (Commodore) Children Center | Elementary (K) | San Francisco Unified | 0.89 | 22 | - | - | 86.36% | 4.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 95.45% |
Tenderloin Community | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 0.91 | 258 | 8.73% | 19.10 | 79.46% | 13.95% | 44.96% | 12.40% | 17.05% |
Redding Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 0.98 | 230 | 39.35% | 20.90 | 62.17% | 30.00% | 19.13% | 9.57% | 26.09% |
Chin (John Yehall) Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.07 | 260 | 87.07% | 30.50 | 76.15% | 6.54% | 6.15% | 0.38% | 82.31% |
Parker (Jean) Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.10 | 149 | 67.45% | 16.50 | 86.58% | 2.01% | 13.42% | 13.42% | 61.74% |
Spring Valley Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.13 | 228 | 52.73% | 18.20 | 73.68% | 4.39% | 52.63% | 2.19% | 35.53% |
Garfield Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.32 | 194 | 73.65% | 15.80 | 50.52% | 8.25% | 15.98% | 8.76% | 48.45% |
Parks (Rosa) Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.43 | 385 | 50.49% | 20.80 | 54.03% | 10.91% | 22.86% | 21.56% | 20.26% |
Marshall Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.44 | 233 | 11.37% | 25.20 | 83.26% | 12.45% | 82.40% | 0.86% | 1.29% |
S.F. International High | High (8-12) | San Francisco Unified | 1.47 | 401 | 22.12% | 16.80 | 73.32% | 6.73% | 78.05% | 0.25% | 14.21% |
Downtown High | High (9-12) | San Francisco Unified | 1.49 | 103 | 7.97% | 15.70 | 71.84% | 3.88% | 48.54% | 30.10% | 3.88% |
Yick Wo Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.50 | 209 | 81.60% | 17.40 | 34.93% | 25.84% | 11.96% | 3.83% | 34.45% |
Muir (John) Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.53 | 214 | 55.81% | 17.80 | 74.30% | 8.88% | 57.48% | 18.69% | 1.87% |
Francisco Middle | Middle (6-8) | San Francisco Unified | 1.55 | 535 | 50.86% | 17.60 | 73.27% | 9.91% | 17.01% | 4.49% | 59.81% |
Webster (Daniel) Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.60 | 346 | 71.97% | 20.30 | 34.10% | 28.03% | 42.20% | 4.62% | 9.25% |
Sherman Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | San Francisco Unified | 1.63 | 287 | 75.68% | 19.10 | 38.68% | 34.49% | 17.77% | 9.76% | 18.47% |
O'Connell (John) High | High (9-12) | San Francisco Unified | 1.74 | 506 | 33.84% | 16.30 | 74.70% | 5.34% | 70.55% | 10.28% | 5.93% |
For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:
The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.
Name | Level | Type | Faith Affiliation | Coed | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five Keys Independence High School (SF Sheriff's) | High (9-12) | Charter | - | - | 0.41 | 3,019 | 85.68% | 53.30 | 25.37% | 9.11% | 60.81% | 22.39% | 1.92% |
San Francisco City Academy | Private (K-8) | Private | Assembly of God | Coed | 0.49 | 104 | - | 14.80 | - | 0.00% | 54.81% | 14.42% | 26.92% |
De Marillac Academy | Private (4-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 0.55 | 120 | - | 9.30 | - | 0.83% | 65.83% | 0.83% | 23.33% |
Ecole Notre Dame Des Victoires School | Private (K-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 0.58 | 258 | - | 11.90 | - | 53.10% | 17.44% | 0.00% | 11.24% |
Alt School | Private (K-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.73 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Life Learning Academy Charter | High (9-12) | Charter | - | - | 0.84 | 41 | 35.29% | 8.90 | 87.80% | 9.76% | 21.95% | 63.41% | 2.44% |
Cathedral School For Boys | Private (K-8) | Private | Episcopal | Boys | 0.86 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Presidio Knolls School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.88 | 387 | - | 6.10 | - | 11.37% | 1.81% | 0.78% | 25.06% |
Sterne School | Private (4-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.89 | 173 | - | 6.40 | - | 56.65% | 9.83% | 8.09% | 16.76% |
Cumberland Chinese School | Private (K-12) | Private | Presbyterian | Coed | 0.92 | 66 | - | 7.60 | - | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 96.97% |
Mission Montessori | Private (K-4) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.95 | 62 | - | 12.40 | - | 46.77% | 8.06% | 8.06% | 11.29% |
Sacred Heart Cathedral Preparatory | Private (9-12) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 1.09 | 1,329 | - | 22.30 | - | 43.49% | 14.37% | 2.56% | 22.12% |
Millennium School Of San Francisco | Private (6-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.09 | 95 | - | 6.80 | - | 56.84% | 11.58% | 2.11% | 10.53% |
Chinese American International School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
International High School | Private (9-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Fusion Academy San Francisco | Private (6-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.30 | 29 | - | 2.00 | - | 62.07% | 20.69% | 10.34% | 6.90% |
Sts Peter & Paul School | Private (K-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 1.33 | 155 | - | 11.10 | - | 43.87% | 2.58% | 2.58% | 20.65% |
Stuart Hall High School | Private (9-12) | Private | Roman Catholic | Boys | 1.35 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Live Oak School | Private (K-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.36 | 420 | - | 6.00 | - | 49.52% | 5.00% | 4.05% | 13.57% |
Convent Of The Sacred Heart High School | Private (9-12) | Private | Roman Catholic | Girls | 1.36 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The New School of San Francisco | Elementary (K-8) | Charter | - | - | 1.40 | 439 | 85.07% | 19.90 | 33.71% | 35.08% | 37.59% | 5.69% | 11.16% |
San Francisco Friends School | Private (K-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.44 | 441 | - | 12.10 | - | 56.69% | 11.34% | 3.40% | 28.57% |
St Brigid School | Private (K-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 1.46 | 140 | - | 11.20 | - | 34.29% | 8.57% | 10.71% | 37.86% |
La Scuola International School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.57 | 321 | - | 5.60 | - | 37.69% | 5.61% | 0.31% | 4.05% |
La Scuola International School-Mission Campus | Private (PK-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.57 | 319 | - | 4.00 | - | 32.29% | 4.08% | 14.11% | 2.19% |
Children's Day School | Private (PK-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.76 | 533 | - | 16.80 | - | 35.27% | 9.57% | 4.69% | 16.70% |
Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.
Poor or Very Poor Air Quality | 2.14% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worst Month | December | ||||||||
Major Pollutant | PM2.5 | ||||||||
Pollutants | |||||||||
Bad or Very Bad SO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad NO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM10 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 | 0.27% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad O3 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad CO | 0.00% |
A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.
Sound Score | 60 (Busy) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Noise | |||||||||
Airports | Calm | ||||||||
Vehicular Traffic | Busy | ||||||||
Local Commercial and Community | Busy |
Using Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS), this section forecasts the potential earthquake impact and damage likelihood in the area over the next 50 years, offering vital insights into seismic risks.
PGA | 0.72 |
---|---|
Earthquake Risk | High |
The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.
On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:
Has High-Risk Zones | No |
---|---|
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) | - |
Has Moderate-Risk Zones | Yes |
The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.
Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.
Walk Score® | 98 (Walker's Paradise) |
---|---|
Bike Score® | 85 (Very Bikeable) |
Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.
Marrital Status | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single, Never Married | 55.51% | ||||||||
Married | 32.95% | ||||||||
Other | 11.54% | ||||||||
Female to Male Ratio | 0.76 |
Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.
Has Any Pet | 34.84% |
---|---|
Has Dog(s) | 19.02% |
Has Cat(s) | 15.81% |
Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.
On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:
2020 Presidential Election Results | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Biden | 83.87% | ||||||||
Donald Trump | 13.56% |
Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.
Very Liberal | 32.44% |
---|---|
Somewhat Liberal | 40.60% |
Somewhat Conservative | 18.25% |
Very Conservative | 8.72% |
Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.
Median Home Value | 1,284,009 |
---|---|
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value | 1,380,984 |
5-Year Appreciation Forecast | 7.55% |
Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.
Median Monthly Rent | 1,745 |
---|---|
Median Home Value | 1,284,009 |
Rent to Value Ratio | 0.14% |
The Desirability Score measures how closely an area approaches a "perfect" neighborhood. This ideal is characterized by no crime or safety concerns, top-tier schools, a highly-educated population, no noise or air pollution, no risk of earthquakes or floods, high walkability, and a harmonious mix of nature and development.
The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating closer alignment to this ideal.
Desirability Score | 26.53 |
---|
The Bang for the Buck Index measures the ratio of the expected cost of a neighborhood based on its characteristics to its actual cost. An index close to 1 implies that the neighborhood's value is on par with its qualities.
An index greater than 1 indicates that the area offers excellent value for what it provides, while an index less than 1 suggests that the area may be overpriced.
Note that this measure is estimated relative to the entire US housing market, not just the local market.
Bang for the Buck | 16.80 |
---|
Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.