This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Hunters Point

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.99-mi Radius 08/27/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Significance: Hunters Point is home to the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, a historic site that played a crucial role during World War II.
  • Cultural Diversity: The neighborhood is a melting pot of cultures, with significant Hispanic, Black/African American, and Asian communities.
  • Artistic Hub: Hunters Point is known for its vibrant arts scene, including the annual Shipyard Artists Open Studios, where local artists showcase their work.

Suitability

  • Diverse Community: With a racial/ethnic composition of 29% Hispanic, 27% Black/African American, and 29% Asian, the area aligns well with your preference for a diverse neighborhood.
  • Serene/Natural Scenery: The neighborhood has limited landscaped areas (2%) and wild vegetation (1%), which might not fully meet your preference for serene and natural surroundings.
  • Safety Concerns: The property crime index (315) and personal crime index (383) are significantly higher than the national average, which could be a concern for long-term residence.
  • Young Demographic: With 31% of the population being young adults (20-39), the area has a youthful vibe that might appeal to a young couple.
  • Overall Conclusion: While the diversity and youthful demographic are strong positives, the high crime rates and limited natural scenery might make this area less suitable for your long-term residence.

The Positive

  • Strong Community Ties: The neighborhood has a balanced mix of families with children (36%) and without children (31%), fostering a strong sense of community.
  • Educational Opportunities: The San Francisco Unified School District ranks in the 60th percentile statewide, offering decent educational opportunities.
  • Walkability: With a Walk Score of 74, the area is very walkable, making daily errands and activities convenient without needing a car.

The Negative

  • High Crime Rates: The property crime index (315) and personal crime index (383) are significantly above the national average, posing safety concerns.
  • Environmental Risks: The area has a high flood risk and moderate to high earthquake risk, which could impact long-term property stability and insurance costs.
  • Limited Green Spaces: Only 2% of the area is landscaped, which might not satisfy your preference for serene and natural surroundings.

Alternatives

  • Bernal Heights : This neighborhood offers a more serene environment with more green spaces and parks. It also has a lower crime rate and a strong sense of community. However, it might be slightly more expensive.
  • Glen Park : Known for its quaint, village-like atmosphere and Glen Canyon Park, this area offers a peaceful setting with good transit options and lower crime rates. It also has a diverse population and good schools.
  • Noe Valley : This area is family-friendly with excellent schools, lower crime rates, and a variety of parks. It is slightly more upscale but offers a serene environment and strong community ties.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

28/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

19/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 29,541
Population (5-Year Projection) 29,784
5-Year Growth Forecast 0.82%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 9,591
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 9,463
Average Household Size 3.12
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 35.95%
Families without Kids 31.37%
Non-Families 32.67%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 37.40
Age Groups
0-9 Years 11.73%
10-19 Years 11.94%
20-34 Years 22.48%
35-49 Years 21.70%
50-64 Years 17.98%
65+ Years 14.17%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 7.67%
Hispanic 28.70%
Black/African American 27.22%
Asian 28.54%
Other 7.87%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 14.13
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 20.85%
High School or Some College 50.39%
College Degree 19.36%
Graduate/Professional Degree 9.40%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $79,200
On Food Stamps/SNAP 22.75%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 20.87%
$25K-$50K 13.26%
$50K-$100K 23.59%
$100K-$200K 23.41%
$200K+ 18.87%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 10,306
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 38.10%
Renter Occupied 53.72%
Vacant 8.18%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1971
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 15.51%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 24.63%
Old (Before 1980) 59.87%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 25
Closest Property (mi) 0.18
Total Units 3,164
Units per Square Mile 1,027.27
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 9 (1227 Units)
LIHTC 16 (1937 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 2.34%
Residential Areas 41.60%
Urban & Commercial 41.64%
Water Bodies 12.67%
Wooded Areas 0.00%
Wild Vegetation 1.37%
Farms & Gardens 0.00%
Marshes & Swamps 0.12%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 326
Property Crime Index 315
Personal Crime Index 383

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 4
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.32
Involving DUI 25.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 44
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 14.29
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.04
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 19
Rape 12
Sexual Battery 6
Other Offense 7
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 VELBERT JENKINS
1232 QUESADA AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.04 mi Rape
2 DAVID EUGENE ALBILLAR
1244 REVERE AVE B, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.08 mi Offense Against Children
3 TAPELU PUSI
1062 OAKDALE AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.12 mi Sexual Battery
4 LOUIS TION TELFOR
1029 OAKDALE AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.13 mi Rape
5 COY LEE GRUBBS
1271 INGALLS ST 7, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.16 mi Offense Against Children
6 ROBERT PAUL BYRD
69 KISKA RD, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
7 WOODROW BLAKE
1373 REVERE ST 2, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
8 WILLIE HAWKINS
13 MATTHEW CT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.25 mi Offense Against Children
9 ANTHONY CATO
1407 QUESADA AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.26 mi Other Offense
10 ANTHONY THOMAS
1396 SHAFTER AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.27 mi Offense Against Children
11 STEVEN JOHN SLATON
1379 THOMAS ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.28 mi Offense Against Children
12 JOSE REYES
1401 SHAFTER AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.29 mi Sexual Battery
13 ROBERT HORTON
1431 THOMAS AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.34 mi Other Offense
14 KYLEN ANTHONY OSBORNE
1459 REVERE ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.34 mi Other Offense
15 DANNY RAY ROLAND
2111 JENNINGS ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.37 mi Rape
16 COURTNEY POUNDERS
2111 JENNINGS ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.37 mi Rape
17 JAMES OLIVER HARDY
2111 JENNINGS ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.37 mi Rape
18 LUIS YIOVANI ANGEL
1903 KEITH STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
19 LARRY WAYNE WILLIAMS
2120 JENNINGS ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
20 MARCEL LOVE
120 CATALINA ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.57 mi Offense Against Children
21 LARRY L MURPHY
1527 LASALLE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.59 mi Rape
22 RONNIE LEE COOK
21 DEDMAN CT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.61 mi Sexual Battery
23 HERMAN STEWART
847 FAIRFAX AVE 210, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.62 mi Offense Against Children
24 BENNY LEE COBBS
52 LATONA ST 52, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.63 mi Offense Against Children
25 MARCUS SEWELL
105 THORNTON AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.66 mi Offense Against Children
26 DAMIEN REGINALD BREWER
36 REBECCA LN, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.67 mi Offense Against Children
27 MARIO DERRICK HAMMOND
2830 INGALLS, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.69 mi Offense Against Children
28 GARY HARDEMAN
1633 NEWCOMB AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.71 mi Offense Against Children
29 MICHAEL ANTHONY BROWN
1633 NEWCOMB AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.71 mi Other Offense
30 DONALD BERNARD JOHNSTON
1100 GILMAN AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.72 mi Rape
31 BARNEY ROBERT WONG
1100 GILMAN AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.72 mi Rape
32 JUAN CRISANTO-RAMIREZ
1100 GILMAN AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.72 mi Other Offense
33 JAMAL JORDAN
5880 3RD ST 307, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.72 mi Offense Against Children
34 KEITH LANIER BLACKBURN
1131 GILMAN ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.74 mi Rape
35 JAVIER JOSE CONTRERAS
498 BAYVIEW CIR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.78 mi Offense Against Children
36 DIARRAS MANUEL
712 MENDELL ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.79 mi Other Offense
37 BILL JOHN PATTERSON
1701 LASALLE AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.80 mi Offense Against Children
38 FREDRICK NORRIS GORDON
1711 LA SALLE AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.81 mi Sexual Battery
39 MARLON R ACEITUNO
1178 HOLLISTER AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.81 mi Offense Against Children
40 ALVIN MCNEIL
54 BRIDGEVIEW DR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.82 mi Offense Against Children
41 CARLOS AREVALO
1042 INGERSON ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.86 mi Rape
42 DEON JACKSON
1821 OAKDALE AVE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.91 mi Other Offense
43 DANIEL LEWIS SMITH
1675 JERROLD AVE B9, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.92 mi Rape
44 LAMONTE E FERGUSON
1942 1/2 QUESADA ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124
0.94 mi Rape

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District San Francisco Unified School District
Grade Range K-12
Number of Schools 102
Number of Students 48,785
Student/Teacher Ratio 21.06
State Rank 623 out of 1563
State Rank Percentile 60.14%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Carver (George Washington) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.33 101 0.85% 19.80 81.19% 0.00% 23.76% 46.53% 1.98%
Malcolm X Academy Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.45 102 0.83% 15.60 87.25% 1.96% 6.86% 52.94% 2.94%
Drew (Charles) College Preparatory Academy Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.69 174 1.45% 29.00 71.84% 0.00% 29.89% 52.30% 4.02%
Harte (Bret) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.77 240 4.43% 21.80 92.08% 1.25% 62.50% 20.00% 2.08%
Brown Junior (Willie L) Middle Middle (6-8) San Francisco Unified 1.11 257 36.51% 13.80 55.64% 17.90% 33.46% 21.79% 6.61%
Marshall (Thurgood) High High (9-12) San Francisco Unified 1.20 457 19.21% 15.00 66.30% 0.66% 77.68% 8.10% 10.50%
King Junior (Martin Luther) Academic Middle Middle (6-8) San Francisco Unified 1.26 366 35.01% 18.00 70.22% 2.19% 33.88% 15.30% 39.89%
Taylor (Edward R.) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 1.36 589 61.08% 21.80 83.87% 0.51% 33.96% 2.04% 56.54%
Burton (Phillip and Sala) Academic High High (9-12) San Francisco Unified 1.41 1,060 71.04% 20.10 61.32% 2.26% 39.91% 8.30% 41.42%
El Dorado Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 1.52 135 1.31% 22.50 73.33% 3.70% 45.93% 19.26% 13.33%
Revere (Paul) Elementary Elementary (K-8) San Francisco Unified 1.77 459 1.06% 15.00 78.21% 1.96% 74.51% 8.50% 6.32%
Visitacion Valley Middle Middle (6-8) San Francisco Unified 1.85 326 15.20% 13.90 75.46% 1.23% 52.45% 10.12% 21.78%
Visitacion Valley Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 1.87 254 58.75% 16.50 81.89% 0.39% 25.20% 9.84% 48.82%
King (Thomas Starr) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 1.97 322 80.80% 18.30 40.99% 8.70% 16.15% 10.25% 33.85%
Hillcrest Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.01 336 16.92% 20.50 84.23% 0.30% 61.31% 8.63% 21.43%
Bryant Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.05 226 5.28% 19.60 83.63% 0.44% 87.17% 8.41% 0.00%
Flynn (Leonard R.) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.12 416 17.84% 20.80 54.57% 15.62% 59.13% 8.65% 1.92%
Serra (Junipero) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.24 253 35.90% 20.00 69.96% 3.16% 73.12% 4.35% 9.49%
Webster (Daniel) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.37 346 71.94% 20.30 34.10% 28.03% 42.20% 4.62% 9.25%
Jordan (June) School for Equity High (9-12) San Francisco Unified 2.42 201 24.36% 13.20 63.18% 0.50% 71.14% 11.94% 8.46%
Huerta (Dolores) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.50 337 47.87% 21.50 54.90% 16.91% 70.92% 1.19% 3.26%
S.F. International High High (8-12) San Francisco Unified 2.54 401 22.10% 16.80 73.32% 6.73% 78.05% 0.25% 14.21%
Moscone (George R.) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.58 357 60.13% 24.00 76.47% 2.52% 57.98% 1.12% 30.53%
Chavez (Cesar) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.59 423 1.60% 21.10 71.87% 2.13% 87.94% 3.07% 0.95%
Downtown High High (9-12) San Francisco Unified 2.60 103 7.96% 15.70 71.84% 3.88% 48.54% 30.10% 3.88%
Cleveland Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 2.60 297 3.05% 17.70 75.08% 0.67% 82.83% 1.68% 6.73%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
KIPP San Francisco College Preparatory High (9-12) Charter - - 0.30 316 38.25% 12.50 81.65% 0.95% 66.46% 26.58% 1.58%
Rise University Preparatory Private (8-10) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 0.75 59 - 9.20 - 1.69% 30.51% 40.68% 11.86%
KIPP Bayview Elementary Elementary (K-4) Charter - - 0.78 161 1.48% 16.10 92.55% 0.62% 25.47% 55.90% 0.62%
KIPP Bayview Academy Middle (5-8) Charter - - 0.96 199 30.55% 15.70 88.44% 0.00% 48.24% 35.68% 3.52%
Alta Vista School Private (K-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.40 197 - 7.00 - 50.25% 5.58% 5.08% 27.41%
San Francisco School Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.65 - - - - - - - -
Rise Institute Private (8-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.68 11 - 2.70 - 9.09% 45.45% 45.45% 0.00%
Cornerstone Academy-Cambridge Campus Private (4-8) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.91 186 - 7.70 - 1.61% 0.54% 0.54% 94.62%
Golden Bridges School Private (PK-7) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.92 136 - 6.30 - 47.79% 7.35% 2.21% 14.71%
Meadows-Livingstone School Private (2-7) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.94 17 - 7.30 - 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Our Lady Of The Visitacion School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.97 244 - 22.10 - 2.05% 24.59% 2.87% 53.69%
Cornerstone Academy Private (PK-3) Private Baptist Coed 2.00 369 - 25.20 - 0.54% 1.08% 0.27% 49.05%
Oakes Children's Center Private (3-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.08 - - - - - - - -
St Anthony - Immaculate Conception School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.19 185 - 18.50 - 12.43% 80.54% 3.78% 1.62%
St Peter's School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.24 196 - 15.60 - 0.00% 97.96% 0.51% 1.53%
Mission Preparatory Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 2.38 469 40.50% 22.30 68.44% 3.62% 79.96% 4.05% 6.40%
Synergy School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.61 190 - 9.80 - 39.47% 9.47% 5.26% 15.79%
Live Oak School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.63 420 - 6.00 - 49.52% 5.00% 4.05% 13.57%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System SFPUC CITY DISTRIBUTION DIVISION
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 834,046
Primary Source Surface water purchased
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 2.13%
Worst Month December
Major Pollutant PM2.5
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.82%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 178
High-Risk Sites 23
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 7.47
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.16
Facility Types
Active 174
Transport 15
Large Quantity Generator 9
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 1

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 76 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.74
Earthquake Risk Moderate to High

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, VE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.31
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 74 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 60 (Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 47.81%
Married 38.18%
Other 14.01%
Female to Male Ratio 1.00

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 35.03%
Has Dog(s) 24.04%
Has Cat(s) 16.26%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 83.71%
Donald Trump 13.80%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 23.79%
Somewhat Liberal 32.10%
Somewhat Conservative 28.41%
Very Conservative 15.70%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 1,025,704
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 1,178,253
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 14.87%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,438
Median Home Value 1,025,704
Rent to Value Ratio 0.14%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.