This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Leander

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
Custom Shape 08/14/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Rapid Growth: Leander, TX, is one of the fastest-growing cities in the U.S., with a projected population growth of 15.51% over the next five years.
  • Historical Roots: Founded in 1882, Leander was named after Leander "Catfish" Brown, a railroad official. The city has a rich history tied to the development of the railroad in Texas.
  • Cultural Diversity: Leander boasts a diverse population with 26% Hispanic residents and 7% Asian residents, contributing to a vibrant cultural tapestry.
  • Modern Living: The median year of construction for homes in Leander is 2007, indicating a relatively modern housing stock with many new developments.
  • Community Events: Leander hosts the annual Old Town Street Festival, featuring live music, local vendors, and family-friendly activities, drawing residents together for a day of fun and community spirit.

Suitability

  • Diverse Population: With a racial and ethnic composition that includes 55% Non-Hispanic White, 26% Hispanic, and 7% Asian, Leander offers a diverse community that aligns with your cultural preference.
  • Urban Feel: Although Leander is not a major urban center, its rapid growth and development have brought urban amenities and a bustling atmosphere, making it suitable for those who enjoy a lively environment.
  • Political Climate: The area leans slightly conservative, with 53% of votes for Trump in the 2020 election, which may not align perfectly with your liberal preference.
  • Safety: Leander scores well on safety, with property and personal crime indices significantly below the national average, providing a secure environment for short-term residence.
  • Overall Conclusion: Leander is a growing, diverse, and safe community with a modern housing stock. However, the political climate may not be a perfect match for your liberal views.

The Positive

  • High Safety Levels: The property crime index of 46 and personal crime index of 30 are well below the national average, ensuring a safe living environment.
  • Strong Education System: The Leander Independent School District ranks in the 82nd percentile statewide, offering excellent educational opportunities.
  • Modern Housing: With a median home value of $464,412 and a significant portion of homes built after 2000, Leander provides modern and well-maintained housing options.

The Negative

  • Political Mismatch: The area leans conservative, which may not align with your liberal political preference, potentially affecting your comfort in community interactions.
  • Flood Risk: Leander has a high flood risk, including zones with a 1% annual chance of flooding. It's crucial to consider flood insurance and mitigation measures.
  • Limited Walkability: With a Walk Score of 52 and a Bike Score of 46, Leander is somewhat walkable and bikeable, which may not fully meet your preference for a bustling urban environment.

Alternatives

  • Cedar Park, TX : Just south of Leander, Cedar Park offers a similar suburban feel with a slightly more liberal political climate and excellent schools. It also has a higher Walk Score, making it more pedestrian-friendly.
  • Round Rock, TX : Known for its strong economy and excellent schools, Round Rock provides a diverse community and a more urban feel with better walkability and amenities.
  • Austin, TX : As the state capital, Austin offers a vibrant urban lifestyle, a liberal political climate, and diverse cultural experiences. However, it comes with a higher cost of living compared to Leander.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

74/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

81/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 67,110
Population (5-Year Projection) 77,522
5-Year Growth Forecast 15.51%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 2,393
Density Level Medium

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 23,167
Average Household Size 2.90
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 39.00%
Families without Kids 24.85%
Non-Families 36.15%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 35.90
Age Groups
0-9 Years 14.54%
10-19 Years 14.70%
20-34 Years 19.32%
35-49 Years 24.31%
50-64 Years 16.65%
65+ Years 10.48%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 55.43%
Hispanic 26.14%
Black/African American 5.21%
Asian 6.91%
Other 6.32%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.51
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 4.51%
High School or Some College 49.68%
College Degree 31.36%
Graduate/Professional Degree 14.45%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $109,800
On Food Stamps/SNAP 4.10%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 5.73%
$25K-$50K 9.11%
$50K-$100K 28.74%
$100K-$200K 37.88%
$200K+ 18.54%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 25,607
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 64.57%
Renter Occupied 25.90%
Vacant 9.53%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 2007
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 5.26%
Recent (2010-2019) 26.12%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 43.50%
Old (Before 1980) 25.12%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 3
Closest Property (mi) 0.57
Total Units 436
Units per Square Mile 15.55
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC 3 (436 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 9.31%
Residential Areas 15.40%
Urban & Commercial 1.28%
Water Bodies 0.41%
Wooded Areas 30.24%
Wild Vegetation 42.15%
Farms & Gardens 0.16%
Marshes & Swamps 0.86%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 43
Property Crime Index 46
Personal Crime Index 30

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 12
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.11
Involving DUI 16.67%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 31
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 1.11
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.24
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 26
Rape 1
Sexual Battery 3
Other Offense 1

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Leander ISD
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 50
Number of Students 42,415
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.19
State Rank 175 out of 968
State Rank Percentile 81.92%
Other Nearby Districts Liberty Hill ISD
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Campus 007 High (9-12) Leander ISD 0.12 - - - - - - - -
Leander Virtual Learning Academy Middle (2-8) Leander ISD 0.12 77 69.29% 8.10 18.18% 23.38% 20.78% 7.79% 35.06%
Leander Extended Opportunity High (6-12) Leander ISD 0.21 58 - 3.90 36.21% 51.72% 31.03% 12.07% 1.72%
New Hope High School High (11-12) Leander ISD 0.35 51 - 7.80 33.33% 54.90% 31.37% 3.92% 3.92%
Leander Middle Middle (6-8) Leander ISD 0.39 802 74.08% 12.30 34.41% 43.52% 37.41% 4.86% 6.61%
Christine Camacho Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 0.44 680 30.08% 11.80 42.79% 48.68% 38.82% 5.59% 1.91%
Jim Plain Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 1.08 811 70.95% 13.50 25.52% 42.91% 28.24% 7.64% 14.55%
Bagdad Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 1.55 829 40.95% 13.10 48.49% 29.92% 51.51% 3.02% 9.53%
Pleasant Hill Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 1.72 688 49.00% 12.90 27.62% 49.27% 27.47% 3.49% 10.17%
North Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 1.95 441 - 12.90 19.50% 46.94% 26.76% 3.63% 12.24%
Rouse High School High (9-12) Leander ISD 2.04 1,943 82.41% 15.10 12.56% 52.55% 22.34% 4.17% 15.23%
Knox Wiley Middle Middle (6-8) Leander ISD 2.21 783 60.69% 13.10 20.69% 53.26% 24.78% 3.19% 11.62%
Glenn High School High (9-12) Leander ISD 2.25 2,063 62.37% 14.60 28.07% 44.50% 38.49% 6.88% 4.94%
Tarvin Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 2.25 711 91.41% 14.30 9.42% 32.49% 16.60% 2.53% 40.79%
Stacy Kaye Danielson Middle Middle (6-8) Leander ISD 2.34 1,357 69.83% 14.80 31.39% 38.91% 35.74% 7.37% 9.51%
Whitestone Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 2.37 938 84.42% 14.50 18.66% 47.65% 30.38% 4.37% 11.30%
Leander High School High (9-12) Leander ISD 2.85 2,218 73.23% 14.80 25.34% 47.75% 32.19% 5.05% 9.42%
William J Winkley Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 2.90 691 84.83% 13.80 7.96% 52.97% 19.83% 4.63% 14.47%
Block House Creek Elementary Elementary (K-5) Leander ISD 2.93 471 66.49% 12.80 22.51% 57.32% 24.42% 3.18% 5.73%
Running Brushy Middle Middle (6-8) Leander ISD 3.33 1,052 74.29% 13.80 29.28% 47.34% 32.22% 6.08% 8.65%
Patricia Knowles Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 3.37 654 31.33% 11.30 53.21% 27.98% 57.03% 3.98% 5.50%
Larkspur Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 3.47 855 65.03% 14.60 19.18% 45.15% 26.90% 7.49% 14.27%
Lois F Giddens Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 3.81 485 11.60% 11.60 57.11% 37.53% 34.43% 10.31% 8.87%
Monta Jane Akin Elementary Elementary (K-5) Leander ISD 3.83 875 93.05% 15.40 7.09% 41.14% 16.69% 2.06% 32.80%
Florence W Stiles Middle Middle (6-8) Leander ISD 3.90 1,503 97.77% 15.70 6.32% 42.51% 16.30% 2.20% 32.73%
C C Mason Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 4.01 636 76.85% 12.40 22.96% 50.94% 21.23% 5.19% 13.68%
Rancho Sienna Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Liberty Hill ISD 4.28 927 89.89% 14.60 9.60% 56.42% 17.69% 2.59% 16.94%
Santa Rita Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Liberty Hill ISD 4.76 1,038 82.42% 15.80 19.46% 49.71% 23.51% 4.34% 15.90%
Parkside Elementary Elementary (K-5) Leander ISD 4.90 778 94.92% 14.30 2.83% 40.23% 10.15% 2.31% 41.77%
Santa Rita Middle Middle (6-8) Liberty Hill ISD 5.24 870 83.99% 16.50 14.37% 57.82% 21.95% 2.07% 10.00%
Artie L Henry Middle Middle (6-8) Leander ISD 5.51 1,254 82.19% 14.50 23.29% 47.05% 27.59% 4.39% 14.27%
Ronald Reagan Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 5.57 817 88.85% 15.30 10.65% 41.37% 14.81% 3.06% 34.27%
Westside Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 5.65 560 80.33% 13.60 9.82% 61.25% 18.21% 1.79% 11.07%
Vista Ridge High School High (9-12) Leander ISD 5.84 2,646 87.46% 15.90 15.50% 46.67% 26.23% 4.35% 17.16%
Charlotte Cox Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Leander ISD 5.92 659 72.89% 14.20 19.12% 39.91% 22.00% 3.34% 27.31%
Bill Burden Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Liberty Hill ISD 6.08 808 91.56% 14.10 19.31% 68.69% 19.93% 1.98% 3.84%
Officer Leonard A Reed Elementary Elementary (K-5) Leander ISD 6.25 674 58.38% 12.10 50.74% 20.92% 57.72% 8.90% 7.57%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Founders Classical Academy Of Leander Alternative (K-12) Charter - - 1.25 695 - 14.00 6.47% 67.19% 21.15% 1.01% 5.47%
The Goddard School-Leander Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.62 224 - 15.00 - 9.38% 0.89% 0.00% 0.45%
Abacus School Of Austin Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.80 165 - 7.50 - 7.88% 0.00% 0.00% 1.21%
Valor Leander Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 1.85 0 - - - - - - -
Primrose School Of Crystal Falls Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.85 183 - 13.00 - 6.01% 0.00% 0.55% 0.55%
Sapientia Montessori School Private (PK-6) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.26 137 - 5.30 - 20.44% 1.46% 0.00% 19.71%
Cedar Park Montessori School Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.28 99 - 15.30 - 25.25% 6.06% 2.02% 13.13%
Harbor Leadership Academy Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.90 35 - 3.20 - 42.86% 25.71% 5.71% 8.57%
Primrose School At Vista Ridge Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.99 79 - 2.00 - 2.53% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Basis Cedar Park Middle (6-9) Charter - - 5.17 0 - - - - - - -
Basis Cedar Park Pri Elementary (K-5) Charter - - 5.17 0 - - - - - - -

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CITY OF LEANDER
Water Health Score 4.35 / 5 Good
Population Served 98,330
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.26%
Worst Month September
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.09%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 8
High-Risk Sites 1
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.04
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 1.44
Facility Types
Active 5
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 1

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 69 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.03
Earthquake Risk Almost None

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, A)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.14
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 52 (Somewhat Walkable)
Bike Score® 46 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 28.70%
Married 59.12%
Other 12.19%
Female to Male Ratio 0.98

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 53.72%
Has Dog(s) 43.61%
Has Cat(s) 20.65%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 44.96%
Donald Trump 52.67%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 15.43%
Somewhat Liberal 25.27%
Somewhat Conservative 34.89%
Very Conservative 24.41%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 464,412
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 511,626
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 10.17%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,251
Median Home Value 464,412
Rent to Value Ratio 0.48%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.