This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Leavenworth Street

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.50-mi Radius 08/27/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Significance: Nob Hill is one of San Francisco's original "Seven Hills" and has a rich history dating back to the Gold Rush era. It was once home to the city's wealthiest residents.
  • Architectural Marvels: The neighborhood boasts stunning architecture, including the iconic Grace Cathedral and the Fairmont Hotel, which survived the 1906 earthquake and fire.
  • Cultural Hub: Nob Hill is known for its cultural vibrancy, hosting events like the annual Nob Hill Holiday Tree Lighting and the Grace Cathedral's Christmas Concerts.

Suitability

  • High Renter Occupancy: With 73% of the housing units renter-occupied, Nob Hill is well-suited for tenants, providing a variety of rental options.
  • Young Adult Population: The area has a significant young adult population (48% aged 20-39), which aligns well with your demographic as a working single man.
  • Safety Concerns: The property crime index is 253, and the personal crime index is 164, both significantly above the national average, which may be a concern for personal safety.
  • Vibrant Social Scene: The high percentage of single, never-married residents (54%) suggests a vibrant social scene, ideal for networking and socializing.
  • Overall Conclusion: Nob Hill offers a dynamic and renter-friendly environment with a robust social scene, but the elevated crime rates are a notable drawback.

The Positive

  • Excellent Walkability: With a Walk Score of 98, Nob Hill is a walker's paradise, making it easy to access amenities, restaurants, and entertainment on foot.
  • High Education Levels: A significant portion of the population (65%) holds a college or graduate degree, indicating a well-educated community.
  • Strong Rental Market: The median monthly rent of $2,559 is relatively affordable compared to the high median home value, making it a cost-effective option for renters.

The Negative

  • High Crime Rates: The property crime index of 253 and personal crime index of 164 are well above the national average, posing safety concerns.
  • Noise Levels: With a sound score of 62, the area can be quite busy and noisy, which might affect your quality of life.
  • Old Building Stock: A large majority of buildings (84.08%) were built before 1980, which might mean outdated infrastructure and potential maintenance issues.

Alternatives

  • Pacific Heights : Known for its stunning views and historic mansions, Pacific Heights offers a quieter, more upscale environment. However, it may come with a higher price tag.
  • Russian Hill : This neighborhood offers similar amenities and walkability but with slightly lower crime rates. It's also known for its scenic views and charming streets.
  • Marina District : With a vibrant nightlife, waterfront views, and lower crime rates, the Marina District is a great alternative. It also has a higher percentage of young professionals and singles.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

29/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

17/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 47,516
Population (5-Year Projection) 48,005
5-Year Growth Forecast 1.03%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 60,147
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 28,119
Average Household Size 1.69
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 6.74%
Families without Kids 22.02%
Non-Families 71.24%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 37.30
Age Groups
0-9 Years 4.34%
10-19 Years 3.16%
20-34 Years 37.31%
35-49 Years 23.13%
50-64 Years 14.38%
65+ Years 17.70%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 42.49%
Hispanic 10.75%
Black/African American 2.71%
Asian 38.35%
Other 5.70%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 16.18
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 11.05%
High School or Some College 23.97%
College Degree 40.58%
Graduate/Professional Degree 24.40%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $105,900
On Food Stamps/SNAP 7.68%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 16.42%
$25K-$50K 8.81%
$50K-$100K 22.48%
$100K-$200K 23.22%
$200K+ 29.07%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 33,398
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 11.66%
Renter Occupied 72.54%
Vacant 15.81%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1940
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.22%
Recent (2010-2019) 3.60%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 12.09%
Old (Before 1980) 84.08%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 10
Closest Property (mi) 0.27
Total Units 1,004
Units per Square Mile 1,270.89
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 5 (441 Units)
LIHTC 5 (563 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 0.05%
Residential Areas 8.70%
Urban & Commercial 91.25%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 0.00%
Wild Vegetation 0.00%
Farms & Gardens 0.00%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 240
Property Crime Index 253
Personal Crime Index 164

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 3
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.95
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 34
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 43.04
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.12
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 17
Rape 2
Sexual Battery 10
Other Offense 5
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 HENRY KEKELA KAAHEA
1306 CALIFORNIA ST 3, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.12 mi Sexual Battery
2 CARLOS ALBERTO MIRANDA
1120 HYDE ST 207, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.12 mi Other Offense
3 PATRICK J TURNER
1388 CALIFORNIA ST 406A, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.15 mi Sexual Battery
4 CRAIG MATHEW HAMMOND
1245 CALIFORNIA ST 603, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.17 mi Rape
5 ALBERT L HOFHINE
1430 LARKIN ST 15, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.18 mi Offense Against Children
6 BRETT AARON NIEBERGALL
1250 TAYLOR ST 3, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
0.21 mi Offense Against Children
7 LARON IRELAND
985 TAYLOR ST A, ALAMEDA, CA 94501
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
8 ANTON OROBCHENKO
1618 POLK ST 10, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.25 mi Offense Against Children
9 ROOZBEH IRAVANI
1105 BUSH ST 202, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.28 mi Offense Against Children
10 ALEXANDER RUDOLPH
839 LEAVENWORTH ST 210, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.29 mi Other Offense
11 VINCENT L FEFEE
940 SUTTER ST 211, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.31 mi Other Offense
12 MARVIN BLAKE
1485 PINE ST 300, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.31 mi Offense Against Children
13 JEFFREY ALLEN RUSSELL
1330 BUSH ST 5F, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.31 mi Sexual Battery
14 WILLIAM PAUL KARABIN
1485 PINE ST 315, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.31 mi Other Offense
15 LEON MAYBERRY JONES
977 PINE ST 302, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
0.32 mi Rape
16 JEREMY CASTRO
1788 CLAY ST 409, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.32 mi Sexual Battery
17 BRUCE EUGENE TAYLOR
1788 CLAY ST 604, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
18 MARVIN BLAKE
1485 PINE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
19 TIMOTHY YATES YOURCHEK
2048 POLK ST 211, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.33 mi Offense Against Children
20 LARRY GILBERT FLORES
735 TAYLOR STREET 402, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
0.35 mi Sexual Battery
21 JOSEPH WILLIAM MOONEY
845 SUTTER ST 412, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.36 mi Offense Against Children
22 ALTON DIXON
840 POST ST 214, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.39 mi Other Offense
23 CLIFF A MC CLAIN
922 POST ST 207, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108
0.39 mi Sexual Battery
24 BRYAN KEITH CURLEE
825 POST ST 102, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
25 DINO ALFRED CARDELLI
737 POST ST 1514, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.42 mi Offense Against Children
26 WESLEY WILLIAMS TRAMEL
737 POST ST 1322, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.42 mi Offense Against Children
27 MICHAEL DAVID WILSON
839 POST ST 205, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.42 mi Offense Against Children
28 ANDRE RICO-LAMAR ENGLISH
711 POST ST 415, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.43 mi Sexual Battery
29 YING WATT
1688 PINE ST W406, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.45 mi Offense Against Children
30 RICHARD JEROME BENJAMIN
630 GEARY ST 303, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
0.45 mi Sexual Battery
31 PAUL G HAWKINS
811 GEARY ST 603, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.49 mi Offense Against Children
32 PAUL THOMAS
811 GEARY ST 510, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.49 mi Offense Against Children
33 JUAN RAFAEL CORRALES
938 GEARY ST 202, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109
0.49 mi Sexual Battery
34 ERNEST GARZA REYES
520 GEARY ST 604, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
0.50 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District San Francisco Unified School District
Grade Range K-12
Number of Schools 102
Number of Students 48,785
Student/Teacher Ratio 21.06
State Rank 623 out of 1563
State Rank Percentile 60.14%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Spring Valley Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.14 228 52.71% 18.20 73.68% 4.39% 52.63% 2.19% 35.53%
Redding Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.29 230 39.33% 20.90 62.17% 30.00% 19.13% 9.57% 26.09%
Lau (Gordon J.) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.43 644 86.01% 22.50 89.29% 0.93% 5.28% 0.00% 88.04%
Parker (Jean) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.43 149 67.43% 16.50 86.58% 2.01% 13.42% 13.42% 61.74%
Yick Wo Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.61 209 81.60% 17.40 34.93% 25.84% 11.96% 3.83% 34.45%
Sherman Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.64 287 75.66% 19.10 38.68% 34.49% 17.77% 9.76% 18.47%
Lee (Edwin and Anita) Newcomer Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.69 21 - 6.00 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Tenderloin Community Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.80 258 8.72% 19.10 79.46% 13.95% 44.96% 12.40% 17.05%
Garfield Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.82 194 73.63% 15.80 50.52% 8.25% 15.98% 8.76% 48.45%
Chin (John Yehall) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.82 260 87.08% 30.50 76.15% 6.54% 6.15% 0.38% 82.31%
Francisco Middle Middle (6-8) San Francisco Unified 0.83 535 50.82% 17.60 73.27% 9.91% 17.01% 4.49% 59.81%
Galileo High High (9-12) San Francisco Unified 0.84 1,826 89.65% 21.60 57.34% 10.41% 26.45% 4.87% 51.53%
San Francisco Public Montessori Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.92 118 75.86% 16.80 49.15% 27.97% 21.19% 15.25% 7.63%
Parks (Rosa) Elementary Elementary (K-5) San Francisco Unified 0.99 385 50.46% 20.80 54.03% 10.91% 22.86% 21.56% 20.26%
Marina Middle Middle (6-8) San Francisco Unified 1.23 676 73.98% 23.10 66.72% 9.17% 19.97% 5.03% 57.10%
Carmichael (Bessie)/FEC Elementary (K-8) San Francisco Unified 1.29 544 5.06% 21.20 67.65% 10.29% 25.92% 15.26% 31.80%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Cathedral School For Boys Private (K-8) Private Episcopal Boys 0.15 - - - - - - - -
Cumberland Chinese School Private (K-12) Private Presbyterian Coed 0.42 66 - 7.60 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 96.97%
St Brigid School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.49 140 - 11.20 - 34.29% 8.57% 10.71% 37.86%
The New School of San Francisco Elementary (K-7) Charter - - 0.55 439 85.07% 19.90 33.71% 35.08% 37.59% 5.69% 11.16%
Ecole Notre Dame Des Victoires School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.57 258 - 11.90 - 53.10% 17.44% 0.00% 11.24%
Stuart Hall High School Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Boys 0.65 - - - - - - - -
Sterne School Private (4-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.66 173 - 6.40 - 56.65% 9.83% 8.09% 16.76%
Sts Peter & Paul School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.68 155 - 11.10 - 43.87% 2.58% 2.58% 20.65%
Convent Of The Sacred Heart High School Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Girls 0.68 - - - - - - - -
San Francisco City Academy Private (K-8) Private Assembly of God Coed 0.70 104 - 14.80 - 0.00% 54.81% 14.42% 26.92%
Sacred Heart Cathedral Preparatory Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.77 1,329 - 22.30 - 43.49% 14.37% 2.56% 22.12%
De Marillac Academy Private (4-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.81 120 - 9.30 - 0.83% 65.83% 0.83% 23.33%
Hamlin School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Girls 0.88 435 - 10.40 - 48.05% 1.84% 3.22% 11.03%
The Hamlin School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Girls 0.88 435 - 11.90 - 48.05% 1.84% 3.22% 11.03%
Stuart Hall For Boys Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Boys 0.96 - - - - - - - -
Convent & Stuart Hall Schools Of The Sacred Heart Private (K-12) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.97 1,169 - 5.40 - 73.48% 5.82% 8.98% 4.02%
Fusion Academy San Francisco Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.02 29 - 2.00 - 62.07% 20.69% 10.34% 6.90%
Millennium School Of San Francisco Private (6-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.03 95 - 6.80 - 56.84% 11.58% 2.11% 10.53%
Mission Montessori Private (K-4) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.14 62 - 12.40 - 46.77% 8.06% 8.06% 11.29%
St Vincent De Paul School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.19 229 - 13.90 - 68.56% 13.54% 2.18% 1.75%
Altschool - Fort Mason Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.23 55 - 5.00 - 87.27% 3.64% 3.64% 5.45%
Guidepost Montessori At Fort Mason Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.23 57 - 9.50 - 38.60% 15.79% 12.28% 24.56%
Academy Of Thought And Industry Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.25 33 - 8.20 - 75.76% 0.00% 9.09% 6.06%
International High School Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.26 - - - - - - - -
Chinese American International School Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.26 - - - - - - - -
Town School For Boys Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Boys 1.29 414 - 6.00 - 61.35% 5.31% 4.35% 13.29%
Hillwood Academic Day School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.29 26 - 5.40 - 69.23% 15.38% 0.00% 15.38%
Gateway High High (9-12) Charter - - 1.31 489 84.45% 16.80 49.08% 14.11% 40.70% 9.20% 12.88%
KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy Middle (5-8) Charter - - 1.31 278 51.93% 17.50 94.96% 5.40% 70.50% 17.27% 3.96%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System SFPUC CITY DISTRIBUTION DIVISION
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 834,046
Primary Source Surface water purchased
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 2.12%
Worst Month December
Major Pollutant PM2.5
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.27%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.09%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 266
High-Risk Sites 14
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 17.72
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.20
Facility Types
Active 256
Transport 1
Large Quantity Generator 13
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 62 (Busy)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Busy

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.71
Earthquake Risk Moderate to High

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones -
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) -
Has Moderate-Risk Zones -

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 98 (Walker's Paradise)
Bike Score® 63 (Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 53.52%
Married 34.58%
Other 11.90%
Female to Male Ratio 0.99

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 33.36%
Has Dog(s) 20.55%
Has Cat(s) 16.36%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 85.38%
Donald Trump 12.36%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 36.90%
Somewhat Liberal 41.90%
Somewhat Conservative 15.20%
Very Conservative 5.99%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 1,453,312
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 1,646,399
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 13.29%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,559
Median Home Value 1,453,312
Rent to Value Ratio 0.18%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.