This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Leonia

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
2.56-mi Radius 09/07/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Charm: Leonia, NJ, boasts a rich history dating back to its establishment in 1668. The town is known for its well-preserved Victorian homes and historic landmarks, such as the Civil War Drill Hall and Armory.
  • Cultural Melting Pot: Leonia is a diverse community with a significant Asian population, accounting for 31% of residents. This cultural diversity is reflected in local festivals, restaurants, and community events.
  • Artistic Hub: Leonia has a vibrant arts scene, home to the Players Guild of Leonia, one of the oldest community theater groups in New Jersey. The town also hosts an annual arts festival that attracts artists and visitors from across the region.

Suitability

  • Family-Friendly Environment: With 27% of households having children, Leonia is well-suited for families. The presence of multiple school districts, including the highly ranked Englewood Cliffs Borough School District (98th percentile), ensures access to quality education.
  • Safe and Secure: The area boasts low crime rates, with property and personal crime indices significantly below the national average. This makes it a safe environment for raising young children.
  • Diverse Community: Leonia's racial and ethnic diversity aligns with your cultural preference. The mix of Non-Hispanic White (31%), Hispanic (26%), Black/African American (8%), and Asian (31%) residents creates a rich, multicultural atmosphere.
  • Serene and Natural: The neighborhood offers a serene environment with 14% of the land dedicated to landscaped areas, parks, and residential gardens. This provides ample opportunities for outdoor activities and family outings.
  • Political Alignment: The area leans liberal, with 66% of residents voting for Biden in the 2020 election, matching your political preference.
  • Overall Conclusion: Leonia, NJ, is a highly suitable area for your family, offering a safe, diverse, and serene environment with excellent educational opportunities.

The Positive

  • High Median Household Income: The median household income of $107,917 indicates a relatively affluent community, which often correlates with better public services and amenities.
  • Strong Educational Attainment: With 55% of residents holding a college or graduate degree, the area is home to a well-educated population, fostering a community that values education and intellectual growth.
  • Walkability: Leonia has a Walk Score of 75, making it very walkable. This is ideal for families who enjoy walking to nearby parks, schools, and shops.
  • Low Crime Rates: The property crime index of 42 and personal crime index of 25 are well below the national average, contributing to a safe living environment.
  • Appreciating Home Values: The 5-year home value appreciation forecast of 8.70% suggests a promising investment for long-term residence.

The Negative

  • High Housing Costs: The median home value of $603,168 and median monthly rent of $2,379 may be a financial stretch for some families. Budgeting carefully and exploring mortgage options will be crucial.
  • Older Housing Stock: With 71.18% of buildings constructed before 1980, you may encounter older homes that require more maintenance and updates.
  • Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could lead to potential property damage and higher insurance costs. Investing in flood insurance and considering properties outside high-risk zones is advisable.
  • Air Quality Concerns: Poor air quality for 11.02% of the year, particularly in February, could affect family health. Using air purifiers and monitoring air quality reports can mitigate this issue.
  • Hazardous Waste Sites: The presence of 17 high-risk facilities may raise environmental concerns. Staying informed about local environmental health reports and choosing properties away from these sites is recommended.

Alternatives

  • Teaneck, NJ : Teaneck offers a similar cultural diversity and liberal political climate. It has a slightly lower median home value and excellent schools, such as the Teaneck Township School District (46th percentile). However, it shares similar air quality concerns.
  • Fort Lee, NJ : Fort Lee provides a vibrant community with strong educational institutions like the Fort Lee Borough School District (79th percentile). It has a higher population density but offers more recent housing options and better walkability.
  • Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Englewood Cliffs is an affluent area with top-ranked schools (98th percentile) and a serene environment. It has a higher median home value but offers newer housing stock and lower crime rates, making it a premium alternative.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

55/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

50/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 167,072
Population (5-Year Projection) 167,342
5-Year Growth Forecast 0.16%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 8,114
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 65,903
Average Household Size 2.54
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 27.18%
Families without Kids 37.41%
Non-Families 35.42%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 43.10
Age Groups
0-9 Years 10.18%
10-19 Years 10.05%
20-34 Years 18.14%
35-49 Years 21.07%
50-64 Years 20.15%
65+ Years 20.41%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 31.46%
Hispanic 26.47%
Black/African American 8.02%
Asian 30.67%
Other 3.38%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.91
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 7.33%
High School or Some College 37.80%
College Degree 31.85%
Graduate/Professional Degree 23.02%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $107,900
On Food Stamps/SNAP 5.69%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 10.20%
$25K-$50K 13.53%
$50K-$100K 22.07%
$100K-$200K 32.12%
$200K+ 22.08%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 69,856
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 53.41%
Renter Occupied 40.93%
Vacant 5.66%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1964
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.48%
Recent (2010-2019) 6.24%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 22.10%
Old (Before 1980) 71.18%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 15
Closest Property (mi) 0.42
Total Units 1,774
Units per Square Mile 86.16
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 7 (930 Units)
LIHTC 8 (844 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 13.89%
Residential Areas 54.71%
Urban & Commercial 13.04%
Water Bodies 10.84%
Wooded Areas 2.88%
Wild Vegetation 0.28%
Farms & Gardens 0.11%
Marshes & Swamps 4.21%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 39
Property Crime Index 42
Personal Crime Index 25

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 32
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.39
Involving DUI 15.63%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 18
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 0.87
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.25
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 7
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 5
Other Offense 6

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Leonia Borough School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 3
Number of Students 2,131
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.49
State Rank 129 out of 615
State Rank Percentile 79.02%
Other Nearby Districts Bogota Borough School District, Cliffside Park Borough School District, Edgewater Borough School District, Englewood City School District, Englewood Cliffs Borough School District, Fairview Borough School District, Fort Lee Borough School District, Hackensack City School District, Little Ferry Borough School District, Palisades Park Borough School District, Ridgefield Borough School District, Ridgefield Park Township School District, Teaneck Township School District
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Anna C. Scott Elementary School Elementary (PK-4) Leonia Public School District 0.26 608 77.27% 9.20 9.87% 18.75% 22.70% 2.30% 49.18%
Leonia Middle School Middle (5-8) Leonia Public School District 0.56 654 87.57% 14.70 14.68% 22.17% 25.69% 3.36% 42.81%
Leonia High School High (9-12) Leonia Public School District 0.63 847 75.83% 14.00 18.06% 26.09% 25.97% 5.43% 35.77%
School No. 2 Elementary (PK-4) Fort Lee School District 0.73 357 81.52% 9.00 14.85% 20.17% 22.13% 4.76% 48.74%
Lindbergh Elementary School Elementary (1-6) Palisades Park School District 0.95 769 29.66% 13.60 58.78% 6.76% 66.45% 1.69% 23.80%
Lewis F. Cole Middle School Middle (5-8) Fort Lee School District 1.08 1,194 83.29% 11.70 16.25% 26.13% 21.44% 5.03% 44.30%
Charles R Smith Early Chilhood Center Elementary (PK-K) Palisades Park School District 1.10 242 - 6.70 50.83% 7.85% 62.40% 2.07% 26.86%
Nathaniel Hawthorne Elementary School Elementary (K-4) Teaneck School District 1.16 274 52.01% 8.50 39.78% 9.12% 43.80% 29.93% 13.87%
Ridgefield Park Junior Senior High School High (7-12) Ridgefield Park Public School District 1.19 1,174 39.10% 13.30 41.99% 20.19% 64.40% 5.62% 8.86%
Roosevelt Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Ridgefield Park Public School District 1.32 333 44.34% 10.40 34.53% 17.12% 66.07% 5.71% 7.51%
School No. 1 Elementary (K-4) Fort Lee School District 1.35 542 93.37% 11.50 8.67% 21.22% 14.58% 1.48% 57.38%
School No. 3 Elementary (PK-4) Fort Lee School District 1.41 339 89.20% 9.80 16.52% 15.34% 19.17% 7.08% 53.10%
Fort Lee High School High (9-12) Fort Lee School District 1.45 1,160 59.48% 13.90 12.24% 27.84% 23.62% 5.43% 40.86%
Thomas Jefferson Middle School Middle (5-8) Teaneck School District 1.48 529 49.33% 9.40 41.21% 11.15% 44.99% 28.54% 11.53%
Palisades Park Junior-Senior High School High (7-12) Palisades Park School District 1.66 745 35.07% 13.90 44.16% 9.53% 61.21% 1.21% 27.38%
School No. 4 Elementary (K-4) Fort Lee School District 1.70 400 72.58% 12.90 10.00% 33.00% 20.25% 4.25% 39.50%
Lincoln Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Ridgefield Park Public School District 1.79 341 53.43% 8.50 39.88% 20.53% 69.21% 4.40% 3.81%
George Washington School Elementary (PK-2) Edgewater School District 1.83 318 - 10.40 8.81% 26.73% 16.04% 3.14% 50.63%
E. Roy Bixby Elementary (PK-5) Bogota Public School District 1.89 293 45.98% 10.40 51.88% 15.70% 73.72% 4.10% 5.80%
Theodora Smiley Lacey Elementary School Elementary (PK-K) Teaneck School District 1.88 130 - 65.00 40.77% 18.46% 32.31% 30.77% 10.77%
Bogota Middle School Middle (6-7) Bogota Public School District 1.91 197 64.44% 15.70 54.82% 10.66% 71.57% 7.11% 9.64%
Grant Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Ridgefield Park Public School District 1.91 204 54.92% 8.80 49.51% 12.75% 68.14% 2.94% 13.73%
Bogota Junior/Senior High School High (8-12) Bogota Public School District 1.94 442 49.76% 11.70 46.15% 15.16% 69.46% 7.92% 5.88%
Upper School Middle (3-8) Englewood Cliffs School District 2.08 264 98.80% 6.40 1.14% 25.38% 6.82% 3.03% 59.85%
Teaneck High School High (9-12) Teaneck School District 2.16 1,271 47.87% 11.70 31.00% 12.51% 39.50% 35.01% 9.83%
Ridgefield Memorial High School High (9-12) Ridgefield School District 2.19 533 67.06% 11.70 24.20% 27.39% 49.16% 3.00% 19.32%
Bergen Boulevard School Elementary (K-4) Ridgefield School District 2.28 212 - 9.20 38.68% 25.94% 46.23% 5.19% 21.23%
Shaler Academy Elementary (PK-3) Ridgefield School District 2.32 165 - 7.70 32.12% 22.42% 49.70% 4.24% 20.61%
Lillian M. Steen Elementary (PK-5) Bogota Public School District 2.39 326 58.79% 13.00 53.37% 9.20% 69.02% 9.82% 8.28%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Green House Preschool & Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.76 74 - 6.60 - 8.11% 1.35% 0.00% 16.22%
New Christian Academy, Inc Private (K) Private Presbyterian Coed 0.78 12 - 6.00 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Notre Dame Academy Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.02 415 - 14.40 - 17.35% 31.57% 2.41% 32.53%
Christ The Teacher Academy Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.18 329 - 13.50 - 17.63% 20.67% 1.52% 37.08%
Montessori Plus Academy Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.24 - - - - - - - -
Small World Montessori School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.28 15 - 1.00 - 6.67% 0.00% 0.00% 6.67%
Fusion Academy Englewood Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.40 28 - 1.20 - 89.29% 0.00% 3.57% 3.57%
Y C S Fort Lee Education Center Private (7-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.43 - - - - - - - -
Japanese Children's Society Private (PK-6) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.69 139 - 6.60 - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 61.15%
Yeshiva Ohr Hatalmud Of Englewood Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 1.81 - - - - - - - -
Heichal Hatorah Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 1.82 181 - 7.50 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
St Joseph Academy Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.92 192 - 10.60 - 50.52% 0.00% 6.25% 9.38%
Trinity Lutheran School Private (PK-K) Private Other Lutheran Coed 1.95 70 - 10.00 - 5.71% 5.71% 1.43% 0.00%
Childrens Home Montessori School Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.15 37 - 4.30 - 10.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
The Community School Inc. Private (2-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.17 247 - 5.50 - 48.58% 34.41% 17.00% 0.00%
The Moriah School Private (PK-8) Private Jewish Coed 2.18 591 - 7.30 - 81.73% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
First Presbyterian Preschool & Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.24 36 - 3.40 - 11.11% 0.00% 0.00% 11.11%
Teaneck Community Charter school Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 2.25 358 62.89% 11.50 15.64% 18.99% 32.40% 29.61% 9.78%
Community School Private (4-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.29 86 - 3.10 - 26.74% 45.35% 23.26% 4.65%
Dwight-Englewood School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.31 1,068 - 8.20 - 0.00% 4.96% 11.24% 23.78%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System VEOLIA WATER NEW JERSEY HACKENSACK
Water Health Score 4.05 / 5 Good
Population Served 792,713
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0071 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 4
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 11.02%
Worst Month February
Major Pollutant PM2.5
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.41%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 1.93%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 7.16%
Bad or Very Bad O3 1.19%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 456
High-Risk Sites 17
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.83
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.23
Facility Types
Active 127
Transport 1
Large Quantity Generator 15
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 4

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 73 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.18
Earthquake Risk Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, A)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.21
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 75 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 37 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 31.85%
Married 53.07%
Other 15.08%
Female to Male Ratio 0.96

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 43.26%
Has Dog(s) 30.19%
Has Cat(s) 19.54%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 66.36%
Donald Trump 32.73%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 23.61%
Somewhat Liberal 32.99%
Somewhat Conservative 28.10%
Very Conservative 15.30%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 603,168
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 655,642
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 8.70%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,379
Median Home Value 603,168
Rent to Value Ratio 0.39%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.