This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Maple Wood Lane

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.50-mi Radius 10/19/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Charm: Maple Woods is known for its mid-20th-century architecture, with 81.2% of homes built before 1980, offering a nostalgic charm for those who appreciate vintage aesthetics.
  • Cultural Hub: Madison is home to the University of Wisconsin, which influences the cultural and liberal atmosphere of the area, making it a vibrant place for retirees who enjoy intellectual and cultural activities.
  • Political Leanings: With 81% of the area voting for Biden in the 2020 election, Maple Woods is a predominantly liberal neighborhood, aligning well with those who prefer a politically progressive community.

Suitability

  • Serene Environment: With 21% of the area covered in landscaped parks and gardens, Maple Woods offers a serene and natural setting, ideal for a retired individual or couple seeking tranquility.
  • Homogeneous Community: The neighborhood is predominantly Non-Hispanic White (73%), which aligns with the client's preference for a homogeneous cultural environment.
  • Safety and Security: The area boasts a low personal crime index of 61, significantly below the national average, providing a safe environment for retirees.
  • Flood Risk Concern: Despite its many positives, the high flood risk in the area could be a concern for potential property damage, requiring careful consideration and possibly additional insurance.
  • Overall Conclusion: Maple Woods is a suitable match for the client, offering a serene, safe, and culturally aligned environment, though flood risk should be addressed.

The Positive

  • High Educational Attainment: With 51% of residents holding a college or graduate degree, the area is intellectually stimulating and likely to have a rich cultural scene.
  • Strong Property Value Growth: The 5-year home value appreciation forecast of 18.36% suggests a solid investment opportunity for a second home.
  • Excellent Water Quality: The Madison Water Utility scores 4.75 out of 5 for water health, ensuring clean and safe drinking water for residents.

The Negative

  • Older Housing Stock: With 81.2% of homes built before 1980, potential buyers may face higher maintenance costs and the need for renovations.
  • Limited Public Transit: A transit score of 40 indicates limited public transportation options, which might be inconvenient for those without a car.
  • High Flood Risk: The area is in a high flood risk zone, necessitating flood insurance and possibly impacting property values and safety.

Alternatives

  • Shorewood Hills : Known for its beautiful landscapes and proximity to Lake Mendota, Shorewood Hills offers a similar serene environment with a slightly higher median home value but lower flood risk.
  • Nakoma : This neighborhood provides a strong sense of community and historic homes, with a more robust public transit system and a similar liberal political climate.
  • University Heights : With its vibrant cultural scene and proximity to the University of Wisconsin, University Heights offers a dynamic environment with more modern amenities and a slightly higher home value appreciation forecast.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

59/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

69/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 2,598
Population (5-Year Projection) 2,668
5-Year Growth Forecast 2.69%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 3,289
Density Level Medium

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 1,357
Average Household Size 1.91
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 12.31%
Families without Kids 26.09%
Non-Families 61.61%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 42.80
Age Groups
0-9 Years 9.28%
10-19 Years 8.24%
20-34 Years 21.02%
35-49 Years 21.90%
50-64 Years 19.75%
65+ Years 19.82%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 72.63%
Hispanic 7.85%
Black/African American 11.05%
Asian 2.27%
Other 6.20%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.71
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 4.63%
High School or Some College 44.74%
College Degree 35.77%
Graduate/Professional Degree 14.86%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $59,400
On Food Stamps/SNAP 12.68%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 13.49%
$25K-$50K 27.41%
$50K-$100K 28.89%
$100K-$200K 21.08%
$200K+ 9.14%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 68.71%
Unemployment Rate 2.29%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 1,431
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 58.28%
Renter Occupied 36.55%
Vacant 5.17%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1954
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.07%
Recent (2010-2019) 1.26%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 17.47%
Old (Before 1980) 81.20%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 2
Closest Property (mi) 0.16
Total Units 101
Units per Square Mile 127.85
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC 2 (101 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 20.73%
Residential Areas 58.91%
Urban & Commercial 15.44%
Water Bodies 2.10%
Wooded Areas 1.69%
Wild Vegetation 0.09%
Farms & Gardens 0.82%
Marshes & Swamps 0.23%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 80
Property Crime Index 84
Personal Crime Index 61

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 1
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.32
Involving DUI 100.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 9
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 11.39
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.02
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 5
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 3
Other Offense 1
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 WILLIAM CRUMP
1 MAPLE WOOD LN UNIT 302, MADISON, WI 53704-3971
0.02 mi Offense Against Children
2 BARRY STAMPS
6 MAPLE WOOD LN UNIT 14, MADISON, WI 53704-3945
0.09 mi Sexual Battery
3 DEAN R BLACK
1319 CROWLEY AVE, MADISON, WI 53704-4209
0.09 mi Sexual Battery
4 MALCOLM E SEGASTURE
1322 RUSKIN ST, MADISON, WI 53704-4220
0.15 mi Offense Against Children
5 DANIEL JAMES BAER
1110 RUSKIN ST APT 8, MADISON, WI 53704
0.20 mi Sexual Battery
6 JEFFREY S STEPHENSON
1521 PLEASURE DR, MADISON, WI 53704-3825
0.39 mi Offense Against Children
7 SHELBY M MASSIE
1602 LOFTSGORDON AVE APT 4, MADISON, WI 53704-4057
0.40 mi Offense Against Children
8 KYLE EVANS
1932 HEATH AVE, MADISON, WI 53704-4004
0.49 mi Other Offense
9 MARK JORDAN MOFFAT
2018 N SHERMAN AVE APT 6, MADISON, WI 53704-3957
0.50 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Madison Metropolitan School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 53
Number of Students 25,237
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.23
State Rank 330 out of 428
State Rank Percentile 22.90%
Other Nearby Districts School District Not Defined
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Shabazz-City High High (9-12) Madison Metropolitan School District 0.26 121 37.12% 8.70 42.15% 55.37% 14.88% 12.40% 0.00%
Sherman Middle Middle (6-8) Madison Metropolitan School District 0.26 401 14.82% 11.70 58.10% 31.92% 27.68% 24.19% 6.73%
Emerson Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.08 351 36.76% 13.00 57.26% 42.17% 15.10% 24.50% 3.13%
East High High (9-12) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.25 1,649 19.26% 14.70 55.43% 33.60% 26.44% 20.56% 7.76%
Lake View Elementary Elementary (K-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.50 267 13.95% 9.20 72.66% 17.98% 22.10% 20.97% 30.71%
Hawthorne Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.83 307 14.51% 9.70 65.15% 18.89% 26.71% 30.29% 9.45%
Mendota Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.84 308 22.62% 11.10 79.87% 16.23% 12.99% 54.87% 4.87%
Lowell Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.87 334 44.49% 11.60 45.21% 52.40% 10.18% 23.95% 2.99%
Marquette Elementary Elementary (3-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.94 149 80.40% 11.30 30.20% 65.10% 10.07% 14.09% 1.34%
O'Keeffe Middle Middle (6-8) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.94 452 74.10% 11.70 41.81% 49.78% 13.50% 20.58% 3.32%
Lapham Elementary Elementary (PK-2) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.99 205 - 8.90 37.56% 61.95% 3.90% 20.00% 2.44%
Capital High High (9-12) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.99 139 - 7.50 76.98% 13.67% 23.02% 47.48% 0.00%
Innovative High High (9-12) Madison Metropolitan School District 1.99 132 - 7.50 69.70% 17.42% 33.33% 37.88% 1.52%
Innovative and Alternative Middle Middle (6-8) Madison Metropolitan School District 2.01 0 - 0.00 - - - - -
Gompers Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 2.22 227 24.22% 10.30 53.30% 46.26% 14.10% 24.67% 3.08%
Black Hawk Middle Middle (6-8) Madison Metropolitan School District 2.26 357 9.20% 10.40 71.99% 26.89% 17.37% 34.45% 9.24%
Lindbergh Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 2.37 180 12.54% 10.10 71.11% 18.89% 17.78% 34.44% 13.33%
Schenk Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 2.51 390 12.44% 9.90 58.97% 31.54% 28.21% 20.00% 7.69%
Whitehorse Middle Middle (6-8) Madison Metropolitan School District 2.53 452 16.22% 12.20 57.30% 31.19% 22.57% 28.54% 5.75%
Sandburg Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 3.01 392 10.08% 9.70 64.29% 20.15% 50.26% 15.05% 5.36%
Southside Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 3.33 384 7.35% 10.30 74.74% 16.41% 31.25% 35.68% 4.69%
Kennedy Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 3.63 524 12.63% 14.20 51.91% 37.79% 13.17% 29.20% 7.82%
Sennett Middle Middle (6-8) Madison Metropolitan School District 4.13 623 15.29% 13.00 59.39% 26.16% 40.45% 16.37% 5.94%
Randall Elementary School Elementary (3-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 4.14 311 92.84% 13.20 20.26% 70.42% 9.00% 4.50% 7.72%
LaFollette High High (9-12) Madison Metropolitan School District 4.15 1,482 6.50% 15.60 54.18% 29.08% 32.12% 22.27% 5.80%
Franklin Elementary Elementary (PK-2) Madison Metropolitan School District 4.21 297 - 14.80 20.20% 67.68% 11.45% 6.06% 5.39%
Elvehjem Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Madison Metropolitan School District 4.37 418 53.16% 14.20 32.06% 54.31% 13.40% 13.88% 5.26%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Isthmus Montessori Academy Public Alternative (PK-12) Charter - - 0.61 208 - 26.50 7.21% 69.71% 14.42% 4.33% 1.92%
Operation Fresh Start Private (12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.30 36 - 12.00 - 16.67% 47.22% 13.89% 5.56%
Wings To Soar Online Academy Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.42 135 - 29.30 - 82.96% 2.22% 4.44% 1.48%
Eastside Lutheran School Private (PK-8) Private Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod Coed 2.88 135 - 10.60 - 60.00% 4.44% 2.22% 0.74%
St Dennis School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.93 246 - 14.90 - 69.92% 9.35% 5.69% 1.63%
Toad Hill Childrens House Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.07 26 - 1.30 - 11.54% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00%
Madison Country Day School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.53 445 - 7.50 - 65.62% 4.04% 6.52% 9.89%
Immaculate Heart Of Mary Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 3.73 180 - 10.60 - 68.33% 16.67% 0.00% 1.11%
Nuestro Mundo Elementary (K-5) Charter - - 3.82 284 33.55% 10.50 42.25% 26.76% 63.73% 2.11% 0.70%
Holy Cross Lutheran School Private (K-8) Private Other Coed 3.85 165 - 17.50 - 87.27% 8.48% 0.00% 4.24%
St James School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 3.92 113 - 7.80 - 52.21% 14.16% 10.62% 1.77%
Monona Grove Liberal Arts High (6-12) Charter - - 4.08 81 - 10.90 28.40% 82.72% 11.11% 0.00% 0.00%
Woodland Montessori School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.24 72 - 5.00 - 8.33% 2.78% 1.39% 1.39%
Blessed Sacrament School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 4.41 221 - 10.50 - 75.57% 3.62% 1.81% 1.36%
Abundant Life Christian School Private (K-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 4.44 292 - 11.70 - 70.55% 9.59% 7.88% 4.11%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System MADISON WATER UTILITY
Water Health Score 4.75 / 5 Excellent
Population Served 272,000
Primary Source Ground water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0018 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.32%
Worst Month September
Major Pollutant -
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 8
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 5
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 69 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Busy
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.04
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.40
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 75 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 76 (Very Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 39.22%
Married 48.44%
Other 12.34%
Female to Male Ratio 0.90

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 44.66%
Has Dog(s) 30.95%
Has Cat(s) 22.92%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 81.43%
Donald Trump 17.23%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 27.04%
Somewhat Liberal 30.47%
Somewhat Conservative 26.17%
Very Conservative 16.33%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 372,703
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 441,116
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 18.36%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,235
Median Home Value 372,703
Rent to Value Ratio 0.33%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.