This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Matthews

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
Custom Shape 09/15/2025

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Charm: Matthews, NC, was originally a small farming community and has retained much of its historical charm, with the downtown area featuring preserved 19th-century buildings.
  • Renowned Festivals: The Matthews Alive Festival is a popular annual event that celebrates the town's heritage with music, arts, and crafts, drawing visitors from across the region.
  • Railroad Legacy: The Seaboard Air Line Railroad played a significant role in Matthews' development, and the town's historic train depot is a nod to this rich railroad history.

Suitability

  • Homogeneous Community: With 69% of the population being Non-Hispanic White, the area aligns with your preference for a homogeneous community.
  • Serene Environment: The presence of 35% wooded areas and 26% landscaped parks offers a serene and natural setting, perfect for your scenery preference.
  • Political Leanings: The area leans slightly conservative with 54% voting for Trump in 2020, which may not fully align with your liberal political preference.
  • Overall Conclusion: Matthews provides a peaceful and homogeneous environment ideal for short-term residence, though the political climate may require some adjustment.

The Positive

  • Strong Education System: The Union County Public Schools district ranks in the 83rd percentile statewide, offering excellent educational opportunities.
  • Low Crime Rates: With a property crime index of 88 and a personal crime index of 42, the area is notably safer than the national average.
  • High Home Value Appreciation: A projected 21.17% increase in home values over the next five years suggests a strong investment potential.

The Negative

  • High Flood Risk: The area is prone to flooding, which could pose challenges for property maintenance and insurance costs.
  • Limited Political Alignment: The conservative political climate may not fully resonate with your liberal views, potentially impacting community engagement.
  • Sound Levels: With a sound score of 72, vehicular traffic noise may disrupt the serene environment you seek.

Alternatives

  • Ballantyne, NC : Known for its upscale residential areas and excellent schools, Ballantyne offers a more liberal political climate and similar home values. However, it may lack the historical charm of Matthews.
  • Dilworth, Charlotte, NC : This neighborhood provides a vibrant, liberal community with beautiful historic homes and parks. The downside is a higher cost of living compared to Matthews.
  • Davidson, NC : Offers a quaint, college-town atmosphere with a strong sense of community and liberal leanings. It may be further from urban amenities, but it provides a peaceful retreat.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

74/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

83/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 64,604
Population (5-Year Projection) 67,886
5-Year Growth Forecast 5.08%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 1,353
Density Level Medium Low

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 24,873
Average Household Size 2.60
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 27.98%
Families without Kids 39.80%
Non-Families 32.22%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 42.60
Age Groups
0-9 Years 11.11%
10-19 Years 12.39%
20-34 Years 16.77%
35-49 Years 19.48%
50-64 Years 20.09%
65+ Years 20.16%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 69.29%
Hispanic 9.97%
Black/African American 10.26%
Asian 4.87%
Other 5.62%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.63
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 4.98%
High School or Some College 46.85%
College Degree 31.62%
Graduate/Professional Degree 16.55%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $108,300
On Food Stamps/SNAP 4.02%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 6.45%
$25K-$50K 12.00%
$50K-$100K 26.14%
$100K-$200K 39.66%
$200K+ 15.75%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 67.86%
Unemployment Rate 3.70%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 25,673
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 75.35%
Renter Occupied 21.54%
Vacant 3.12%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1997
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 2.77%
Recent (2010-2019) 12.04%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 58.11%
Old (Before 1980) 27.07%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 0
Closest Property (mi) -
Total Units 0
Units per Square Mile 0.00
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 25.87%
Residential Areas 18.06%
Urban & Commercial 2.07%
Water Bodies 0.24%
Wooded Areas 35.40%
Wild Vegetation 0.94%
Farms & Gardens 16.40%
Marshes & Swamps 0.98%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 81
Property Crime Index 88
Personal Crime Index 42

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 11
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.06
Involving DUI 45.45%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 47
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 0.98
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.73
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 28
Rape 3
Sexual Battery 1
Other Offense 15

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Grade Range PK-13
Number of Schools 184
Number of Students 144,116
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.96
State Rank 119 out of 242
State Rank Percentile 50.83%
Other Nearby Districts Union County Public Schools
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Matthews Elementary Elementary (K-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 0.25 738 85.03% 17.00 32.93% 59.62% 16.26% 14.50% 3.79%
Elizabeth Lane Elementary Elementary (K-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 1.37 660 96.38% 15.00 12.73% 67.42% 11.67% 5.30% 12.58%
Butler High School High (9-12) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 1.83 1,843 59.91% 16.90 46.83% 29.63% 30.87% 28.81% 7.38%
Levine Middle College High School High (11-12) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 1.86 200 - 40.00 22.50% 56.50% 15.00% 12.50% 12.00%
Providence High School High (9-12) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2.32 2,126 88.77% 21.30 16.23% 61.71% 11.71% 8.47% 15.00%
Mint Hill Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2.76 826 36.71% 15.90 99.64% 26.27% 28.57% 31.23% 6.90%
Mint Hill Middle Middle (6-8) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 2.87 869 75.42% 15.80 49.60% 32.34% 26.47% 26.12% 9.32%
Crown Point Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 3.02 647 48.52% 14.70 99.38% 16.54% 32.30% 34.31% 11.59%
Stallings Elementary Elementary (K-5) Union County Public Schools 3.37 762 91.95% 16.90 27.95% 60.24% 11.94% 8.53% 12.86%
McKee Road Elementary Elementary (K-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 3.78 511 97.45% 15.40 26.61% 44.81% 9.98% 11.55% 29.55%
Piney Grove Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 3.91 474 43.22% 12.20 99.37% 5.49% 48.95% 22.78% 19.41%
Providence Spring Elementary Elementary (K-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 4.00 596 99.60% 16.20 4.87% 75.34% 5.54% 5.20% 7.21%
Antioch Elementary Elementary (K-5) Union County Public Schools 4.01 842 98.99% 15.90 8.31% 66.51% 9.26% 3.44% 15.08%
Indian Trail Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Union County Public Schools 4.04 620 61.48% 15.10 48.06% 56.94% 20.97% 12.26% 3.87%
Olde Providence Elementary Elementary (K-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 4.26 694 95.03% 16.60 19.74% 71.90% 10.52% 6.63% 6.34%
Rama Road Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 4.57 540 37.65% 15.30 99.44% 25.19% 27.59% 39.44% 3.70%
South Charlotte Middle Middle (6-8) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 4.62 821 90.56% 18.60 23.26% 56.76% 15.96% 12.67% 9.01%
Carmel Middle Middle (6-8) Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools 4.63 1,050 76.20% 16.80 39.43% 46.57% 35.52% 13.24% 2.19%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Covenant Day School Private (K-12) Private Presbyterian Coed 0.42 996 - 12.50 - 85.44% 3.01% 3.51% 1.41%
Crestdale Middle Middle (6-8) Magnet - - 0.88 987 79.56% 18.70 40.63% 45.09% 20.26% 26.24% 4.36%
Carmel Christian School Private (K-12) Private Baptist Coed 1.64 968 - 13.00 - 87.60% 3.62% 3.93% 4.13%
Greyfriars Classical Academy Private (9-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.98 36 - 12.00 - 77.78% 5.56% 11.11% 5.56%
The Fletcher School Private (1-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.03 283 - 4.80 - 87.63% 3.89% 3.18% 0.35%
Crossway Academy Private (K-8) Private Seventh-Day Adventist Coed 2.38 99 - 11.00 - 43.43% 10.10% 14.14% 9.09%
Matthews Charter Academy Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 2.58 775 63.96% 22.90 55.74% 33.81% 23.48% 25.29% 2.97%
Charlotte Secondary High (6-12) Charter - - 2.81 174 11.23% 20.00 - 14.37% 33.33% 40.23% 0.00%
Shands School Private (4-7) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.89 4 - 2.80 - 75.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Trinity Christian Preparatory School Private (8-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 2.97 89 - 12.00 - 83.15% 2.25% 12.36% 2.25%
Matthews Christian Academy Private (PK-12) Private Baptist Coed 3.00 167 - 9.10 - 40.12% 20.96% 19.16% 2.99%
Socrates Academy Alternative (K-11) Charter - - 3.05 947 - 16.40 - 49.95% 10.98% 14.15% 17.32%
Charlotte Christian School Private (K-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 3.07 1,150 - 12.50 - 80.96% 1.83% 9.13% 1.83%
Greenway Park Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Magnet - - 3.08 544 24.30% 13.90 99.45% 11.03% 42.46% 39.34% 2.21%
Charlotte Preparatory School Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.34 402 - 6.50 - 51.74% 3.48% 8.96% 6.22%
Cyzner Institute Private (PK-7) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.35 27 - 5.00 - 59.26% 11.11% 14.81% 7.41%
United Faith Christian Academy Private (PK-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 3.39 167 - 5.00 - 50.30% 4.79% 26.35% 0.60%
Alexander Youth Network Private (1-7) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.44 - - - - - - - -
Telra Institute Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 3.71 551 99.73% 36.70 9.44% 43.01% 10.71% 3.45% 32.12%
Lansdowne Elementary Elementary (K-5) Magnet - - 3.78 547 73.76% 13.80 42.41% 50.27% 12.61% 28.34% 3.11%
Charlotte Latin School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.85 1,560 - 7.80 - 81.99% 1.41% 3.72% 5.58%
1 of 1 Prep Academy Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.89 - - - - - - - -
Charlotte Jewish Day School Private (K-5) Private Jewish Coed 4.11 129 - 8.10 - 94.57% 2.33% 0.00% 0.00%
Union Day School Alternative (K-10) Charter - - 4.13 669 - 14.40 - 55.46% 16.14% 12.56% 8.22%
Providence Day School Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.31 1,820 - 7.40 - 26.10% 26.70% 15.99% 5.33%
Metrolina Christian Academy Private (K-12) Private Baptist Coed 4.33 1,124 - 13.20 - 82.03% 2.76% 4.36% 1.16%
East Mecklenburg High School High (9-12) Magnet - - 4.52 2,372 54.13% 18.30 99.87% 19.44% 39.84% 32.67% 5.65%
Queen's Grant Community School Alternative (K-12) Charter - - 4.76 1,341 - 33.20 42.95% 45.04% 16.33% 26.03% 2.46%
Union Prep Academy at Indian Trail Alternative (K-10) Charter - - 4.83 1,181 - 19.70 42.59% 47.25% 20.07% 19.39% 3.90%
Charlotte Country Day School Private (K-12) Private Other Coed 4.98 1,727 - 10.80 - 80.31% 2.26% 8.80% 4.11%
Idlewild Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Magnet - - 4.99 869 54.30% 14.90 99.08% 8.40% 48.45% 26.24% 14.96%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CHARLOTTE WATER
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 1,145,392
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.15%
Worst Month March
Major Pollutant -
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 57
High-Risk Sites 2
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.04
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.78
Facility Types
Active 47
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 2
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 1

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 72 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.13
Earthquake Risk Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.93
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 73 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 47 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 24.83%
Married 62.49%
Other 12.68%
Female to Male Ratio 0.99

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 56.58%
Has Dog(s) 42.97%
Has Cat(s) 24.53%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 44.59%
Donald Trump 53.78%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 14.64%
Somewhat Liberal 23.62%
Somewhat Conservative 35.78%
Very Conservative 25.95%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 447,965
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 542,795
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 21.17%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,074
Median Home Value 447,965
Rent to Value Ratio 0.46%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.