This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Mid-City

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.84-mi Radius 08/26/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Roots: Mid-City, Los Angeles, has a rich history dating back to the early 20th century, known for its charming bungalows and Spanish Revival homes.
  • Cultural Melting Pot: The area is a vibrant mix of cultures, with a significant Hispanic population making up 49% of residents, contributing to a lively cultural scene.
  • Celebrity Ties: Mid-City has been home to several notable personalities, including rapper Ice Cube and actress Taraji P. Henson, adding a touch of Hollywood glamour to the neighborhood.
  • Artistic Hub: The neighborhood is known for its thriving arts scene, with numerous galleries and studios, particularly around the Mid-City Art Center.

Suitability

  • High Renter Occupancy: With 63% of the housing being renter-occupied, Mid-City is well-suited for a tenant like you, ensuring a dynamic rental market.
  • Young Adult Demographic: The area has a significant young adult population (35% aged 20-39), which aligns well with your profile as a working single man.
  • Safety Concerns: The personal crime index is notably high at 206, which could be a concern for your safety. This is an important factor to consider.
  • Vibrant Social Scene: The high percentage of single, never-married residents (51%) suggests a vibrant social scene, which could be appealing for networking and socializing.
  • Overall Conclusion: Mid-City offers a lively and culturally rich environment that aligns well with your lifestyle as a working single man, though safety concerns should be carefully weighed.

The Positive

  • Walkability: With a Walk Score of 76, Mid-City is very walkable, making it convenient for daily errands and fostering a pedestrian-friendly lifestyle.
  • Educational Attainment: A significant portion of the population (43%) holds a college or graduate degree, indicating a well-educated community.
  • Public Transit: The area has good public transit options, with a Transit Score of 62, making commuting and exploring the city more accessible.
  • Cultural Diversity: The neighborhood's diverse racial and ethnic composition adds to its rich cultural fabric, offering a variety of cultural experiences and cuisines.

The Negative

  • High Crime Rates: The property crime index is 124, and the personal crime index is 206, both significantly above the national average, which could impact your sense of security.
  • Air Quality Issues: Poor air quality for nearly 32% of the year, particularly in January, could affect your health, especially if you have respiratory concerns.
  • Aging Infrastructure: With 85.12% of buildings constructed before 1980, you may encounter older infrastructure and potential maintenance issues.
  • Noise Levels: The sound score of 66 indicates a relatively busy and noisy environment, which might not be ideal if you prefer quieter surroundings.

Alternatives

  • Culver City : Just west of Mid-City, Culver City offers a more suburban feel with excellent schools and lower crime rates. It also has a thriving arts district and numerous dining options. However, it may come with a higher cost of living.
  • West Adams : Located to the south of Mid-City, West Adams is known for its historic homes and growing arts scene. It offers a mix of affordability and cultural richness but still has some safety concerns.
  • Koreatown : East of Mid-City, Koreatown is known for its vibrant nightlife, diverse dining options, and excellent public transit. It has a high population density and can be quite lively, which might appeal to a single professional.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

28/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

17/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 31,345
Population (5-Year Projection) 31,061
5-Year Growth Forecast -0.91%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 14,119
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 11,389
Average Household Size 2.75
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 20.70%
Families without Kids 28.65%
Non-Families 50.65%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 37.40
Age Groups
0-9 Years 10.24%
10-19 Years 9.79%
20-34 Years 25.82%
35-49 Years 23.38%
50-64 Years 17.20%
65+ Years 13.57%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 20.72%
Hispanic 48.83%
Black/African American 18.46%
Asian 6.40%
Other 5.59%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 14.91
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 17.00%
High School or Some College 40.17%
College Degree 27.84%
Graduate/Professional Degree 14.99%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $90,800
On Food Stamps/SNAP 8.11%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 11.27%
$25K-$50K 16.66%
$50K-$100K 25.45%
$100K-$200K 32.67%
$200K+ 13.95%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 12,287
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 30.12%
Renter Occupied 62.57%
Vacant 7.31%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1950
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 1.32%
Recent (2010-2019) 2.64%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 10.92%
Old (Before 1980) 85.12%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 0
Closest Property (mi) -
Total Units 0
Units per Square Mile 0.00
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 0.31%
Residential Areas 67.84%
Urban & Commercial 31.78%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 0.00%
Wild Vegetation 0.08%
Farms & Gardens 0.00%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 137
Property Crime Index 124
Personal Crime Index 206

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 11
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 1.24
Involving DUI 9.09%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 23
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 10.36
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.35
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 14
Rape 8
Sexual Battery 1
Other Offense 0
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 JESSE J SPINNER
2023 S CURSON AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.35 mi Rape
2 URIEL MORALES
1936 S MARVIN AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.42 mi Offense Against Children
3 PEDRO ZEPEDA
2015 CHARITON ST #2, LOS ANGELES, CA 90034
0.49 mi Offense Against Children
4 DAVID SALAZAR
1748 1-2 S MARVIN, LOS ANGELES, CA 90019
0.50 mi Offense Against Children
5 REYES LOZANO
2424 CARMONA AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.54 mi Offense Against Children
6 PAUL BERNARD BURGESS
1937 HAUSER BLVD, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.54 mi Rape
7 JUAN JOSE GRUSSI
2537 S CARMONA AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.57 mi Offense Against Children
8 JOE WILLIE KIRKENDOLL
2040 S RIDGELEY DR 105, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.61 mi Rape
9 STACY PRENTICE
2040 S RIDGELEY DR 101, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.62 mi Rape
10 ALEJANDRO GRACIANO
2615 CHARITON ST, LOS ANGELES, CA 90031
0.64 mi Sexual Battery
11 BAHATI USAFI
6074 PICKFORD ST 2, LOS ANGELES, CA 90035
0.64 mi Rape
12 HERIBERTO JUAREZ SERNAS
1960 S HOLT AVE 12, LOS ANGELES, CA 90034
0.65 mi Offense Against Children
13 CRAIG PHILLIP PATTERSON
2416 S RIDGELEY DR, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.65 mi Offense Against Children
14 PHINEAS OLIVIER COZMIUC
1507 HI POINT ST 404, LOS ANGELES, CA 90035
0.69 mi Offense Against Children
15 SIDNEY J WHITFIELD
5607 SMILEY DR, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.71 mi Offense Against Children
16 ROBERT CARLOS ALARCIA
2633 S GARTH AVE #1/2, LOS ANGELES, CA 90034
0.71 mi Offense Against Children
17 RAYMOND EUGENE HAMILTON
1452 S HAYWORTH AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90035
0.72 mi Offense Against Children
18 MATTHEW CARTER
2532 SOUTH DUNSMUIR AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.76 mi Rape
19 ALFRED M WILSON
1480 ALVIRA ST 4, LOS ANGELES, CA 90035
0.78 mi Rape
20 JAMES E BYNUM
1430 1/2 S CRESCENT HEIGHTS BLVD, LOS ANGELES, CA 90035
0.82 mi Rape
21 TERRANCE T SMITH
1606 S HOLT AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90035
0.83 mi Offense Against Children
22 JOSE ALFREDO RIVAS
5570 HOMESIDE AVE 3, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.83 mi Offense Against Children
23 ALFREDO ALVAREZ
5533 HOMESIDE AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA 90016
0.84 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Los Angeles Unified School District
Grade Range K-12
Number of Schools 783
Number of Students 427,795
Student/Teacher Ratio 19.66
State Rank 918 out of 1563
State Rank Percentile 41.27%
Other Nearby Districts Culver City Unified School District
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies High (6-12) Los Angeles Unified 0.32 1,388 89.61% 21.40 45.61% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Marvin Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 0.43 550 52.93% 19.60 89.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Crescent Heights Boulevard Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 0.55 206 50.26% 18.70 84.47% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Shenandoah Street Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 0.87 315 52.04% 19.60 95.87% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Saturn Street Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 0.91 295 33.01% 17.30 93.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Cienega Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 1.07 420 19.24% 20.00 93.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Baldwin Hills Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 1.25 395 55.04% 18.30 78.99% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Alexander Hamilton Senior High High (9-12) Los Angeles Unified 1.26 2,259 74.45% 18.00 74.15% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Cheviot Hills Continuation High (9-12) Los Angeles Unified 1.34 60 14.69% 17.20 85.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Carthay Elementary Of Environmental Studies Magnet Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 1.35 323 68.81% 21.50 66.25% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Canfield Avenue Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 1.38 334 88.32% 24.70 28.44% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Castle Heights Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 1.62 499 93.97% 22.60 27.66% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Susan Miller Dorsey Senior High High (9-12) Los Angeles Unified 1.75 802 18.31% 17.00 92.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
View Park Continuation High (9-12) Los Angeles Unified 1.75 29 - 11.50 86.21% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Alta Loma Elementary Elementary (K-5) Los Angeles Unified 1.77 386 36.58% 18.30 95.85% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Linwood E. Howe Elementary Elementary (K-5) Culver City Unified 1.80 559 80.41% 22.30 32.56% 37.21% 34.35% 7.16% 6.62%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Play Mountain Place Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.63 80 - 6.30 - 31.25% 1.25% 0.00% 0.00%
City Kids La Private (1-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.68 45 - 8.00 - 60.00% 4.44% 17.78% 15.56%
New Los Angeles Charter Middle (6-8) Charter - - 0.68 329 45.54% 26.40 88.45% 0.91% 87.54% 8.21% 0.61%
Cheder Menachem Private (K-8) Private Jewish Boys 0.69 385 - 11.30 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Life Community Service Center Private (PK-K) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 0.82 - - - - - - - -
Mesivta Birkas Yitzchok Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 0.86 75 - 9.60 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Echo Horizon Private (PK-6) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.89 185 - 6.70 - 47.03% 8.11% 9.19% 10.27%
Holy Spirit Elementary School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.03 133 - 18.20 - 1.50% 73.68% 15.79% 0.75%
Kinder Kids Christian Preschool Private (PK-K) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.04 29 - 5.00 - 17.24% 13.79% 17.24% 6.90%
Tashbar Sephardic Yeshiva Ketana Private (PK-8) Private Jewish Coed 1.12 282 - 10.40 - 79.79% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Yula Girls High School Private (9-12) Private Jewish Girls 1.13 187 - 8.10 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Chofetz Chaim Los Angeles Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 1.12 39 - 4.90 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Stella Elementary Charter Academy Elementary (K-4) Charter - - 1.15 248 31.41% 22.50 93.55% 0.00% 79.03% 16.13% 0.00%
Taylor Tot Playhouse Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.20 13 - 1.00 - 0.00% 0.00% 7.69% 0.00%
Donna Ro Schools Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.22 33 - 8.00 - 0.00% 12.12% 12.12% 0.00%
Turning Point School Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.24 299 - 5.00 - 33.11% 5.02% 14.72% 8.70%
New Los Angeles Charter Elementary Elementary (K-5) Charter - - 1.25 193 37.27% 22.50 80.83% 5.18% 64.77% 25.91% 1.04%
Rejoyce In Jesus Christian School Private (K-8) Private Other Coed 1.28 16 - 3.20 - 25.00% 18.75% 56.25% 0.00%
Rabbi Jacob Pressman Academy Private (K-8) Private Jewish Coed 1.29 312 - 8.20 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Machon Los Angeles Private (9-12) Private Jewish Girls 1.33 59 - 4.10 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
The Willows Community School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.34 467 - 7.20 - 62.96% 1.71% 7.71% 3.64%
Park Century School Private (1-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.39 113 - 4.20 - 79.65% 2.65% 5.31% 1.77%
Shalhevet High School Private (9-12) Private Jewish Coed 1.43 252 - 4.90 - 99.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Bais Yaakov Machon Private (9-12) Private Jewish Girls 1.49 58 - 3.90 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Page Private School - Beverly Hills Private (PK-2) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.53 - - - - - - - -
Bais Chaya Mushka Private (K-8) Private Jewish Girls 1.54 361 - 11.10 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Roenne's School Private (PK-1) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.61 57 - 17.00 - 0.00% 5.26% 24.56% 0.00%
Yeshiva Gedolah Of Los Angeles Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 1.68 97 - 11.50 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Harkham-Gaon Academy Private (6-12) Private Jewish Coed 1.72 54 - 9.10 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Futures Academy - Beverly Hills Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.75 50 - 3.30 - 80.00% 4.00% 8.00% 0.00%
Futures Academy-Beverly Hills Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.75 40 - 3.70 - 40.00% 10.00% 12.50% 12.50%
Harkham Hillel Hebrew Academy Private (PK-8) Private Jewish Coed 1.78 558 - 7.20 - 81.54% 0.00% 0.00% 0.36%
Fusion Academy Miracle Mile Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.81 - - - - - - - -
Fusion Academy Mm: Miracle Mile Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.85 70 - 2.40 - 54.29% 7.14% 5.71% 7.14%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System LOS ANGELES-CITY, DEPT. OF WATER & POWER
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 3,868,811
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0039 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 31.97%
Worst Month January
Major Pollutant PM2.5
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 5.71%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 12.64%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 23.35%
Bad or Very Bad O3 8.06%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 147
High-Risk Sites 15
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 6.76
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.02
Facility Types
Active 142
Transport 4
Large Quantity Generator 11
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 66 (Busy)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.86
Earthquake Risk High

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: A, AO, AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.12
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 76 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 70 (Very Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 50.69%
Married 38.57%
Other 10.75%
Female to Male Ratio 0.90

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 39.73%
Has Dog(s) 27.25%
Has Cat(s) 18.20%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 85.90%
Donald Trump 12.26%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 29.55%
Somewhat Liberal 33.87%
Somewhat Conservative 23.10%
Very Conservative 13.48%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 1,280,096
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 1,473,714
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 15.13%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,329
Median Home Value 1,280,096
Rent to Value Ratio 0.18%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.