This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Mueller

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.92-mi Radius 09/24/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Roots: Mueller, Austin, TX, is built on the site of the former Robert Mueller Municipal Airport, which was decommissioned in 1999. The area has since been transformed into a vibrant mixed-use urban village.
  • Eco-Friendly Design: Mueller is renowned for its commitment to sustainability, featuring extensive green spaces, energy-efficient buildings, and a comprehensive recycling program.
  • Community Events: The neighborhood hosts the Mueller Farmers Market every Sunday, offering fresh local produce, artisanal goods, and live music, making it a popular weekend destination for residents.

Suitability

  • Young Professionals: With a median age of 34.8 years and a high percentage of young adults (42%), Mueller is ideal for young professionals seeking a vibrant, active community.
  • Families with Children: Families might find the area less suitable due to the moderate percentage of families with children (21%) and the Austin Independent School District's state rank percentile of 43, which is below average.
  • Retirees: Seniors (10%) might appreciate the area's walkability (Walk Score of 70) and bikeability (Bike Score of 74), but the high property crime index (211) could be a concern for safety-conscious retirees.

The Positive

  • High Education Levels: An impressive 76% of residents hold a college or graduate degree, fostering a highly educated community that can lead to better job opportunities and a stimulating intellectual environment.
  • Strong Income Levels: With a median household income of $117,976 and a significant portion of households earning over $100,000, the area is economically robust, which can translate to better public services and amenities.
  • Modern Housing Stock: The median year built for homes is 2005, and 34.13% of buildings were constructed between 2010-2019, ensuring modern amenities and energy-efficient designs.

The Negative

  • High Property Crime: The property crime index is 211, more than double the national average, which could be a deterrent for potential residents concerned about safety.
  • High Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, including zones with a 1% annual chance of flooding. Prospective homeowners should consider flood insurance and flood-proofing measures.
  • Expensive Housing: With a median home value of $689,260 and a median monthly rent of $2,114, the cost of living in Mueller is high, which may not be affordable for all potential residents.

Alternatives

  • Hyde Park : Located just north of the University of Texas, Hyde Park offers historic charm with its older homes and tree-lined streets. It has a lower property crime rate and excellent walkability but may have older housing stock compared to Mueller.
  • South Lamar : This neighborhood is known for its eclectic mix of shops, restaurants, and entertainment options. It offers a vibrant cultural scene and slightly more affordable housing options, though it may have higher traffic congestion.
  • Crestview : Situated in North Central Austin, Crestview provides a suburban feel with a strong sense of community. It has a lower median home value and a good mix of older and newer homes, making it a more affordable alternative while still being close to downtown Austin.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

50/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

34/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 15,139
Population (5-Year Projection) 16,635
5-Year Growth Forecast 9.88%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 5,691
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 6,975
Average Household Size 2.17
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 21.03%
Families without Kids 20.20%
Non-Families 58.77%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 34.80
Age Groups
0-9 Years 11.57%
10-19 Years 7.86%
20-34 Years 31.12%
35-49 Years 26.45%
50-64 Years 13.00%
65+ Years 10.00%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 56.56%
Hispanic 21.47%
Black/African American 6.27%
Asian 9.55%
Other 6.16%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 17.01
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 3.72%
High School or Some College 20.51%
College Degree 44.40%
Graduate/Professional Degree 31.37%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $118,000
On Food Stamps/SNAP 2.54%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 7.13%
$25K-$50K 10.22%
$50K-$100K 26.49%
$100K-$200K 28.20%
$200K+ 27.97%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 83.35%
Unemployment Rate 2.05%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 7,697
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 47.90%
Renter Occupied 42.72%
Vacant 9.38%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 2005
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.62%
Recent (2010-2019) 34.13%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 17.28%
Old (Before 1980) 47.97%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 4
Closest Property (mi) 0.67
Total Units 312
Units per Square Mile 117.29
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC 4 (312 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 29.47%
Residential Areas 44.49%
Urban & Commercial 24.27%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 0.18%
Wild Vegetation 0.50%
Farms & Gardens 0.07%
Marshes & Swamps 0.89%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 197
Property Crime Index 211
Personal Crime Index 123

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 6
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.56
Involving DUI 16.67%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 6
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 2.26
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.40
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 4
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 1
Other Offense 1

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Austin ISD
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 119
Number of Students 73,384
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.55
State Rank 554 out of 968
State Rank Percentile 42.77%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
General Marshall Middle Middle (6) Austin ISD 0.39 0 - - - - - - -
Blanton Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 0.85 620 73.88% 15.70 41.61% 41.13% 42.10% 7.42% 2.58%
Maplewood Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 0.94 402 85.88% 14.30 28.86% 50.00% 31.59% 7.46% 2.24%
Harris Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.25 373 7.27% 14.30 89.81% 3.75% 80.16% 13.14% 1.07%
Ridgetop Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.31 367 90.29% 15.20 19.07% 40.05% 47.68% 2.18% 3.00%
Campbell Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.37 185 19.72% 15.40 71.35% 21.08% 27.57% 40.00% 6.49%
Pecan Springs Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.46 292 1.37% 16.20 96.58% 5.48% 63.70% 26.71% 1.03%
Sadler Means Ywla Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 1.57 322 4.74% 17.90 86.02% 4.66% 74.53% 16.15% 2.80%
Lee Elementary Elementary (K-6) Austin ISD 1.65 458 87.17% 14.50 21.62% 65.50% 18.34% 2.40% 7.42%
Andrews Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.79 343 9.11% 18.00 96.21% 5.83% 78.72% 5.83% 9.04%
Northeast Early College High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 1.85 1,019 7.95% 16.70 92.54% 3.53% 83.81% 10.30% 1.47%
Oak Springs Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.88 233 0.94% 22.50 96.57% 3.43% 60.09% 34.76% 0.43%
Garza Independence High School High (10-12) Austin ISD 1.92 150 - 5.70 45.33% 39.33% 44.00% 8.67% 3.33%
Eastside Early College High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 2.07 699 9.01% 19.90 80.97% 2.43% 80.54% 15.45% 0.86%
Norman-Sims Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.15 278 4.11% 19.80 95.68% 2.16% 50.72% 41.01% 4.32%
Ortega Elementary Elementary (PK-6) Austin ISD 2.20 274 25.09% 15.30 90.15% 5.47% 78.10% 13.87% 1.46%
Kealing Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 2.28 1,255 93.73% 18.10 29.56% 37.85% 29.48% 10.28% 15.30%
Reilly Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.32 344 86.99% 17.20 36.05% 29.07% 56.69% 1.45% 4.94%
Winn Montessori Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.34 267 23.98% 16.00 66.29% 12.73% 59.18% 20.60% 2.62%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Austin Peace Academy Private (PK-12) Private Islamic Coed 0.76 605 - 6.90 - 32.56% 3.97% 3.97% 55.37%
Los Amiguitos Private (PK-2) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.09 19 - 5.00 - 21.05% 5.26% 0.00% 5.26%
Acton Academy Private (1-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.11 - - - - - - - -
Ascent: An Acton Academy Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.16 65 - 9.10 - 72.31% 0.00% 3.08% 9.23%
Odyssey School Private (5-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.22 56 - 4.70 - 75.00% 12.50% 5.36% 5.36%
Austin Achieve Middle Middle (5-8) Charter - - 1.34 625 13.51% 15.30 95.36% 1.60% 92.48% 5.76% 0.00%
Griffin School Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.50 151 - 6.60 - 72.19% 13.91% 3.97% 7.28%
Greater Calvary Academy Private (K-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.54 7 - 2.30 - 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary Elementary (PK-2) Charter - - 1.57 157 - 16.80 50.96% 0.64% 6.37% 90.45% 0.64%
Texas Empowerment Academy Alternative (3-12) Charter - - 1.57 242 - 12.30 57.02% 0.00% 9.50% 87.60% 0.41%
Hyde Park Montessori Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.69 40 - 4.00 - 7.50% 2.50% 0.00% 0.00%
Austin Independent School District (Isd) Prek Partnership (Pkp) Prekindergarten (PK) Charter - - 1.72 92 - - 88.04% 17.39% 59.78% 18.48% 1.09%
Founders Classical Academy-Austin North Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 1.76 149 19.19% 9.30 43.62% 25.50% 43.62% 16.11% 7.38%
Ahb Community School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.88 72 - 9.00 - 73.61% 13.89% 0.00% 0.00%
Texans Can Academy - Austin High (9-12) Charter - - 1.90 265 3.12% 18.60 85.66% 3.77% 81.89% 12.45% 0.75%
Hyde Park School Private (PK-12) Private Baptist Coed 1.89 757 - 9.40 - 83.09% 5.28% 1.19% 1.85%
Academy Of Thought And Industry Austin Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.90 52 - 5.30 - 76.92% 9.62% 7.69% 5.77%
Cedars Academy Next Generation H S At Highland High (9-12) Charter - - 2.09 111 82.23% 7.40 65.77% 15.32% 74.77% 7.21% 0.00%
The East Austin College Prep At Southwest Key Elementary (PK-6) Charter - - 2.14 161 2.31% 16.80 98.14% 0.62% 89.44% 8.70% 0.00%
The East Austin College Prep At Mlk High (7-12) Charter - - 2.15 226 20.13% 13.30 98.23% 2.21% 88.94% 7.96% 0.00%
Helping Hand Elementary (K-7) Charter - - 2.17 22 - 7.30 - 50.00% 22.73% 27.27% 0.00%
Austin Achieve Pflugerville Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 2.26 171 10.40% 10.60 93.57% 1.75% 64.33% 32.75% 0.00%
Austin Achieve High School High (9-12) Charter - - 2.27 645 29.09% 16.60 94.42% 2.17% 92.25% 5.12% 0.16%
Austin Achieve Northeast Elementary Elementary (PK-4) Charter - - 2.27 1,008 9.33% 16.10 90.97% 2.78% 80.56% 14.88% 0.50%
Idea Health Professions Academy Elementary (K-5) Charter - - 2.32 286 6.33% 15.00 88.46% 7.34% 70.98% 20.28% 0.70%
Idea Health Professions College Preparatory Middle (6-10) Charter - - 2.32 264 73.36% 11.50 89.02% 7.95% 75.38% 14.39% 0.38%
Austin Achieve Ferguson Prekindergarten (PK) Charter - - 2.33 0 - - - - - - -
St Francis School Private (12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.32 376 - 7.70 - 31.12% 3.72% 3.72% 25.00%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CITY OF AUSTIN WATER & WASTEWATER
Water Health Score 4.05 / 5 Good
Population Served 1,115,323
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 5
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.40%
Worst Month September
Major Pollutant -
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 21
High-Risk Sites 1
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.38
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.83
Facility Types
Active 5
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 1
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 1

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 80 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.03
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, AO)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.35
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 70 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 74 (Very Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 45.75%
Married 41.80%
Other 12.45%
Female to Male Ratio 1.01

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 37.18%
Has Dog(s) 23.93%
Has Cat(s) 17.41%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 88.75%
Donald Trump 9.27%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 35.15%
Somewhat Liberal 41.93%
Somewhat Conservative 16.39%
Very Conservative 6.53%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 689,260
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 721,984
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 4.75%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,114
Median Home Value 689,260
Rent to Value Ratio 0.31%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.