This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Pheasant Drive

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.50-mi Radius 10/08/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Roots: Little Elm, TX, was established in 1844 and is one of the oldest towns in Denton County, offering a rich historical backdrop for its residents.
  • Lakeside Living: The town is known for its proximity to Lewisville Lake, providing ample opportunities for water-based recreation and scenic views.
  • Community Events: Little Elm hosts the annual Autumn Fest, a popular event that brings together residents for a celebration of local culture and community spirit.

Suitability

  • Family-Friendly Environment: With 62% of households being families with children, the area is well-suited for your family-oriented lifestyle.
  • Educational Excellence: The Frisco Independent School District, with a state rank percentile of 97, ensures access to high-quality education for your children.
  • Diverse Community: The racial and ethnic composition is diverse, aligning with your preference for a culturally varied environment.
  • Serene Surroundings: The presence of landscaped areas and proximity to Lewisville Lake provide the serene and natural scenery you desire.
  • Political Climate: The area leans slightly conservative with 51% voting for Trump in 2020, which may not fully align with your liberal preference.
  • Overall Conclusion: This neighborhood offers a strong match for your family's needs, particularly in terms of education and community, though the political climate may require consideration.

The Positive

  • Low Crime Rates: With property and personal crime indices significantly below the national average, the area offers a safe environment for your family.
  • High Educational Attainment: A remarkable 66% of residents hold a college or graduate degree, fostering a community of well-educated individuals.
  • Strong Housing Market: The 5-year home value appreciation forecast of 9.96% indicates a robust and growing real estate market, beneficial for long-term investment.

The Negative

  • Population Decline: A projected population decrease of 4.32% over the next five years could impact community vibrancy and local services.
  • High Flood Risk: The area is prone to flooding, necessitating flood insurance and preparedness measures for potential natural disasters.
  • Limited New Construction: With no new homes built since 2020, housing options may be limited to older properties, which might not meet modern preferences.

Alternatives

  • Frisco, TX : Known for its excellent schools and family-friendly amenities, Frisco offers a similar environment with a slightly more liberal political climate.
  • Plano, TX : Offers a diverse community and high-quality schools, along with a more balanced political landscape, making it a strong contender for your preferences.
  • McKinney, TX : Provides a charming historic downtown, excellent schools, and a family-friendly atmosphere, though it may have a higher cost of living compared to Little Elm.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

75/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

81/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 3,730
Population (5-Year Projection) 3,569
5-Year Growth Forecast -4.32%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 4,722
Density Level Medium High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 1,156
Average Household Size 3.23
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 62.11%
Families without Kids 26.82%
Non-Families 11.07%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 37.20
Age Groups
0-9 Years 12.47%
10-19 Years 21.90%
20-34 Years 12.82%
35-49 Years 27.16%
50-64 Years 18.04%
65+ Years 7.61%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 59.33%
Hispanic 13.24%
Black/African American 10.88%
Asian 10.19%
Other 6.35%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 16.54
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 2.28%
High School or Some College 31.95%
College Degree 44.34%
Graduate/Professional Degree 21.43%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $155,900
On Food Stamps/SNAP 2.85%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 2.16%
$25K-$50K 3.63%
$50K-$100K 14.88%
$100K-$200K 41.78%
$200K+ 37.54%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 82.24%
Unemployment Rate 2.40%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 1,171
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 85.48%
Renter Occupied 13.24%
Vacant 1.28%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 2005
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 7.51%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 98.55%
Old (Before 1980) -6.06%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 0
Closest Property (mi) -
Total Units 0
Units per Square Mile 0.00
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 8.09%
Residential Areas 47.34%
Urban & Commercial 12.37%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 2.96%
Wild Vegetation 28.47%
Farms & Gardens 0.77%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 11
Property Crime Index 12
Personal Crime Index 6

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 1
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.32
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 2
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 2.53
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.18
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 2
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 0
Other Offense 0

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Frisco ISD
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 76
Number of Students 66,916
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.81
State Rank 30 out of 968
State Rank Percentile 96.90%
Other Nearby Districts Little Elm ISD
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Corbell Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 0.71 572 83.74% 14.80 21.85% 25.70% 12.76% 18.01% 37.76%
Purefoy Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Frisco ISD 1.08 649 89.07% 16.30 9.09% 50.85% 12.63% 6.47% 23.73%
Boals Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 1.17 692 91.38% 16.70 16.91% 37.86% 14.88% 11.42% 26.45%
Fisher Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 1.24 665 95.47% 16.10 5.56% 44.51% 11.43% 4.96% 32.18%
D H Brent Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Little Elm ISD 1.35 670 66.01% 15.90 60.60% 28.96% 47.76% 14.48% 2.54%
Pink Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Frisco ISD 1.41 671 97.28% 16.40 9.99% 43.52% 9.54% 9.24% 32.79%
Griffin Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 1.50 830 88.90% 14.00 7.83% 56.39% 10.96% 7.11% 18.31%
Newman Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Frisco ISD 1.51 622 98.20% 16.30 4.66% 46.62% 8.04% 4.66% 32.32%
Little Elm High School High (9-12) Little Elm ISD 1.53 2,514 43.33% 18.30 51.87% 30.75% 40.69% 20.17% 3.18%
Robertson Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 1.53 712 92.51% 17.00 11.66% 35.25% 8.71% 13.62% 34.41%
Lone Star High School High (9-12) Frisco ISD 1.59 2,036 83.69% 14.70 16.55% 38.31% 17.53% 18.71% 19.35%
Cobb Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 1.61 905 90.98% 13.50 14.48% 42.43% 15.47% 9.28% 26.63%
Sparks Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 1.74 598 97.43% 15.90 7.36% 39.97% 11.87% 2.68% 39.80%
Lakeview Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Little Elm ISD 1.80 585 50.03% 14.00 39.66% 39.83% 19.49% 28.89% 3.93%
Phillips Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Frisco ISD 1.83 694 86.63% 16.90 17.58% 27.38% 14.99% 17.29% 30.84%
Stafford Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 1.93 927 90.77% 14.00 17.04% 31.61% 13.92% 18.02% 30.10%
Pioneer Heritage Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 2.10 1,076 99.07% 15.80 6.78% 38.20% 8.64% 6.97% 43.31%
Carroll Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Frisco ISD 2.12 508 89.18% 13.50 38.39% 20.67% 57.28% 3.54% 13.39%
Wakeland High School High (9-12) Frisco ISD 2.16 2,147 96.53% 16.00 5.54% 63.06% 12.58% 4.80% 14.44%
Cesar Chavez Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Little Elm ISD 2.20 491 23.89% 12.70 52.95% 36.86% 26.27% 25.25% 4.68%
Nichols Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 2.27 714 99.08% 18.10 2.38% 25.77% 5.88% 5.18% 57.98%
Trent Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 2.44 1,115 94.75% 14.80 8.88% 37.22% 11.48% 11.39% 34.17%
Miller Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 2.68 602 88.51% 17.40 12.62% 20.10% 7.97% 16.61% 47.67%
Minett Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 2.74 465 94.12% 14.70 5.38% 24.73% 10.75% 10.75% 48.17%
Vaughn Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 2.78 729 91.12% 16.10 11.52% 35.80% 11.80% 10.29% 35.39%
Hackberry Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Little Elm ISD 2.80 732 51.14% 15.20 49.32% 24.45% 38.93% 19.54% 11.20%
Pearson Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 2.88 997 98.39% 14.90 6.12% 33.60% 10.93% 5.32% 45.24%
Bledsoe Elementary Elementary (K-5) Frisco ISD 2.97 708 88.86% 17.10 6.07% 42.66% 11.44% 4.10% 35.17%
Reedy High School High (9-12) Frisco ISD 3.01 2,275 95.97% 16.80 6.46% 43.74% 10.24% 6.55% 35.21%
Panther Creek High School High (9-12) Frisco ISD 3.06 753 81.83% 9.00 17.93% 28.69% 11.29% 25.50% 28.95%
Memorial High School High (9-12) Frisco ISD 3.12 1,565 80.67% 12.70 18.27% 39.87% 17.19% 17.51% 20.32%
Wilkinson Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 3.22 0 - - - - - - -
Staley Middle Middle (6-8) Frisco ISD 3.58 591 60.86% 10.50 45.01% 32.83% 38.24% 16.92% 6.94%
Hosp Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Frisco ISD 3.60 725 92.19% 18.40 8.83% 24.41% 10.34% 7.86% 52.00%
Denton County J J A E P Middle (6) Little Elm ISD 3.59 10 - - 70.00% 0.00% 70.00% 30.00% 0.00%
Student Opportunity Center High (9-12) Frisco ISD 3.61 0 - 0.00 - - - - -

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
El Dorado Montessori School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.10 - - - - - - - -
Primrose School Of Frisco At Main And Teel Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.69 199 - 7.00 - 3.52% 1.51% 1.51% 0.50%
Frisco Trails Montessori Private (K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.93 3 - 0.70 - 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% 33.33%
Leadership Prep School Elementary (K-4) Charter - - 2.02 500 88.79% 18.80 - 21.20% 13.60% 14.20% 44.60%
Leadership Prep School Secondary High (5-12) Charter - - 2.11 851 85.35% 18.50 - 33.02% 23.38% 14.92% 23.74%
Creme De La Creme Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.26 195 - 7.50 - 7.18% 0.00% 0.51% 0.00%
Founders Classical Academy - Frisco Alternative (K-12) Charter - - 2.92 957 - 15.70 9.09% 38.87% 13.79% 9.61% 31.66%
Guidepost Montessori Timber Ridge Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.07 103 - 1.00 - 2.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Primrose Of Frisco West Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.23 190 - 8.50 - 5.79% 1.05% 1.05% 1.05%
St Martin De Porres Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 3.50 212 - 8.60 - 34.43% 29.72% 5.66% 5.66%
Legacy Christian Academy Private (PK-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 3.71 1,127 - 11.90 - 72.14% 7.45% 3.55% 4.61%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System TOWN OF LITTLE ELM
Water Health Score 4.35 / 5 Good
Population Served 41,000
Primary Source Surface water purchased
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0008 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 1.87%
Worst Month August
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.46%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 1
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 0
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 81 (Calm)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.06
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.26
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 57 (Somewhat Walkable)
Bike Score® 43 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 24.83%
Married 67.63%
Other 7.54%
Female to Male Ratio 1.07

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 55.88%
Has Dog(s) 45.76%
Has Cat(s) 20.16%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 48.01%
Donald Trump 50.53%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 13.37%
Somewhat Liberal 24.58%
Somewhat Conservative 36.48%
Very Conservative 25.57%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 478,186
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 525,794
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 9.96%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,946
Median Home Value 478,186
Rent to Value Ratio 0.62%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.