This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:
Address | Surroundings | Created on |
---|---|---|
0.50-mi Radius | 07/10/2024 |
Nestled within the heart of Charlotte, Cherry is a historically rich neighborhood with deep roots in the city's cultural and architectural heritage. Known initially for its significant African American community, Cherry has evolved dramatically over the years amid urban development pressures. This juxtaposition of old and new creates a neighborhood with a distinct flavor, characterized by historic charm and contemporary vibrance. Stereotypes aside, Cherry is often perceived as an intersection of socioeconomic diversity—a little-known fact about Cherry is its strong communal bonds and grassroots efforts to preserve its historical identity against gentrification.
Cherry boasts a relatively high median household income at $97,321, indicative of a prosperous community. The population density of 3,681 persons per square mile strikes a harmonious balance, allowing for community interaction while not feeling overly congested. The area is particularly educated, with 73% having a college or graduate degree, hinting at a well-informed and intellectually vibrant environment.
Given a median home value of $940,126 with a solid 5-year appreciation forecast of 9.25%, Cherry exemplifies a stable investment for potential homeowners. The landscape of Cherry, with 21% dedicated to parks and gardens, offers substantial greenery amidst urban hustle, promoting both physical and mental well-being for residents. The high walk score of 82 highlights the pedestrian-friendly nature of the neighborhood, further augmented by a reasonable transit score of 54, making everyday commutes relatively smooth.
Despite its numerous merits, Cherry is not without its challenges. The 5-year population growth forecast of -1.75% could point towards possible concerns among current or potential residents, possibly stemming from high property and rent costs. Notably, the low-income housing units density of 141 per square mile suggests a nuanced socio-economic mix that could either enrich the community fabric or strain public resources, depending on perspective.
Crime is a significant concern, with the property crime index at 290 and personal crime index at 250—both substantially higher than national averages. These statistics underscore the necessity for heightened personal and property protection measures if one decides to move here. The high flood risk, which includes zones with a 1% chance of annual flood, implies that investing in comprehensive flood insurance and reinforced housing structures could be prudent steps.
Cherry pulsates with a community vibe that blends historical reverence with modern lifestyle conveniences. Cultural activities abound, with close proximity to Uptown and its array of museums, theaters, and arts centers like the Mint Museum and Blumenthal Performing Arts Center, enriching the local cultural backdrop. Seasonal festivals recapture the neighborhood spirit and bring together residents and visitors alike, creating social fabric serendipitous to Cherry’s legacy.
Public services in Cherry are commendable, with ample parks such as Independence Park offering green retreats for leisure and exercise. Recreational facilities, libraries like the nearby ImaginOn, and engaging communal spaces contribute to a vibrant living experience. For dining and nightlife, Cherry offers eclectic options from local eateries to upscale dining in nearby South End, ensuring diverse culinary experiences.
Cherry could serve as an ideal haven for young professionals and affluent families who appreciate a blend of historical charm and modern amenities. The higher income brackets indicate a neighborhood conducive to a financially stable lifestyle. Education-focused households would benefit from the high prevalence of degree holders, and the area's cultural depth lends itself to curious minds and heritage enthusiasts. Alternatives for similar perks include neighborhoods like Dilworth, Myers Park, and South End, each offering its unique twist of luxury, education, and convenience.
Conversely, Cherry might pose challenges to lower-income families or seniors seeking quieter, less expensive living conditions. The high crime rates and elevated property values may deter those with budgetary constraints or safety concerns. Alternative neighborhoods like Belmont, Lakewood, and Plaza Midwood cater better to these demographics, offering affordable housing, lower crime rates, and more tranquil environments.
From an investment perspective, Cherry presents a mixed bag but leans favorably towards long-term gains. With a robust 5-year appreciation forecast of 9.25%, investors are likely to see property value growth, bolstered by the neighborhood's desirability and historical significance. This prediction is further backed by high educational attainment among residents, suggesting continued intellectual and economic investment in the area. Investors should, however, be vigilant of the crime statistics and potential flooding risks, factoring in enhanced security measures and environmental protections to safeguard their investments.
Cherry is a neighborhood with palpable historical significance, buoyed by a dynamic socio-cultural environment and strong potential for property appreciation. Despite its challenges such as crime and natural hazards, informed and strategic interventions can mitigate these issues. The nuanced socio-economic texture of Cherry enriches its community narrative, making it a neighborhood worth serious consideration for those aligning with its vibrant yet complex character. For clients looking to make an informed decision, Cherry asks for both the heart and the head—a balance of emotional resonance with practical preparedness.
Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.
Population | 2,908 |
---|---|
Population (5-Year Projection) | 2,857 |
5-Year Growth Forecast | -1.75% |
Density (Person per Square Mile) | 3,681 |
Density Level | Medium |
The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.
Number of Households | 1,464 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Household Size | 1.99 | ||||||||
Household Makeup | |||||||||
Families with Kids | 12.91% | ||||||||
Families without Kids | 19.13% | ||||||||
Non-Families | 67.96% |
Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.
Median Age | 34.70 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Groups | |||||||||
0-9 Years | 8.63% | ||||||||
10-19 Years | 6.50% | ||||||||
20-34 Years | 35.59% | ||||||||
35-49 Years | 20.01% | ||||||||
50-64 Years | 15.68% | ||||||||
65+ Years | 13.58% |
This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.
Non-Hispanic White | 66.92% |
---|---|
Hispanic | 5.54% |
Black/African American | 18.29% |
Asian | 5.02% |
Other | 4.23% |
Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.
Average Schooling Years | 16.85 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Attainment Breakdown | |||||||||
Less than High School | 3.35% | ||||||||
High School or Some College | 23.48% | ||||||||
College Degree | 43.61% | ||||||||
Graduate/Professional Degree | 29.56% |
This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.
Median Household Income | $97,300 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Food Stamps/SNAP | 4.63% | ||||||||
Income Brackets | |||||||||
$0-$25K | 9.97% | ||||||||
$25K-$50K | 14.07% | ||||||||
$50K-$100K | 26.91% | ||||||||
$100K-$200K | 22.54% | ||||||||
$200K+ | 26.50% |
Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.
Total Housing Units | 1,619 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupancy | |||||||||
Owner Occupied | 39.41% | ||||||||
Renter Occupied | 51.02% | ||||||||
Vacant | 9.57% |
The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.
Main Types of Subsidized Housing:
In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.
Total Properties | 2 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Closest Property (mi) | 0.19 | ||||||||
Total Units | 111 | ||||||||
Units per Square Mile | 140.51 | ||||||||
Property Types | |||||||||
Public Housing | - | ||||||||
Section 8 | - | ||||||||
LIHTC | 2 (111 Units) |
Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.
Concise descriptions for each land cover category:
Landscaped Areas | 20.54% |
---|---|
Residential Areas | 53.66% |
Urban & Commercial | 25.31% |
Water Bodies | 0.00% |
Wooded Areas | 0.23% |
Wild Vegetation | 0.00% |
Farms & Gardens | 0.14% |
Marshes & Swamps | 0.00% |
Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.
Total Crime Index | 284 |
---|---|
Property Crime Index | 290 |
Personal Crime Index | 250 |
Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.
You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:
Data Period | 2019-2022 |
---|---|
All Fatal Accidents | 1 |
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile | 0.32 |
Involving DUI | 0.00% |
This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.
Total Sex Offenders | 3 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex Offenders per Square Mile | 3.80 | ||||||||
Closest Sex Offender (mi) | 0.15 | ||||||||
Conviction Type | |||||||||
Offense Against Children | 3 | ||||||||
Rape | 0 | ||||||||
Sexual Battery | 0 | ||||||||
Other Offense | 0 |
In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.
On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.
Main District | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools |
---|---|
Grade Range | PK-12 |
Number of Schools | 183 |
Number of Students | 144,197 |
Student/Teacher Ratio | 16.65 |
State Rank | 129 out of 243 |
State Rank Percentile | 46.91% |
Other Nearby Districts | - |
Name | Level | District | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elizabeth Traditional Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 0.42 | 423 | 41.41% | 13.20 | 56.26% | 8.98% | 18.20% | 64.54% | 4.02% |
Piedmont Middle School | Middle (6-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 0.96 | 1,083 | 88.52% | 22.40 | 33.33% | 18.01% | 14.22% | 56.33% | 7.76% |
Eastover Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 0.98 | 347 | 87.68% | 15.10 | 27.09% | 62.82% | 4.90% | 26.22% | 2.31% |
Dilworth Elementary School Latta Campus | Elementary (3-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.32 | 291 | 94.14% | 16.10 | 16.84% | 67.01% | 11.00% | 16.49% | 1.72% |
First Ward Creative Arts Academy | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.35 | 495 | 48.00% | 13.80 | 99.39% | 3.03% | 14.95% | 74.55% | 1.01% |
Billingsville Elementary | Elementary (K-2) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.40 | 345 | - | 13.20 | 48.41% | 32.75% | 15.07% | 46.96% | 1.45% |
Myers Park Traditional Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.40 | 632 | 73.37% | 16.40 | 30.54% | 44.15% | 9.34% | 36.55% | 5.70% |
Hawthorne Academy of Health Sciences | High (9-12) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.50 | 294 | 43.77% | 14.90 | 48.30% | 4.42% | 41.16% | 43.88% | 8.16% |
Military and Global Leadership | High (9-12) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.50 | 162 | 19.01% | 14.40 | 46.30% | 6.17% | 62.35% | 29.63% | 0.62% |
Chantilly Montessori | Elementary (PK-6) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.59 | 306 | 88.55% | 17.10 | 10.46% | 64.38% | 10.13% | 14.71% | 4.25% |
Sedgefield Middle | Middle (6-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 1.80 | 501 | 56.25% | 13.90 | 99.40% | 42.32% | 12.18% | 39.72% | 1.40% |
Villa Heights Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.06 | 130 | 38.15% | 10.10 | 97.69% | 21.54% | 13.08% | 58.46% | 3.08% |
Irwin Academic Center | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.27 | 402 | 80.56% | 15.30 | 23.88% | 20.40% | 8.96% | 52.74% | 12.94% |
Dilworth Elementary Sedgefield Campus | Elementary (PK-2) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.40 | 376 | - | 16.60 | 15.43% | 70.74% | 7.98% | 11.70% | 3.46% |
Walter G. Byers School | Elementary (PK-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.48 | 337 | 15.65% | 11.50 | 99.11% | 1.48% | 12.76% | 79.53% | 1.19% |
Park Road Montessori | Elementary (PK-6) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.51 | 513 | 86.82% | 15.90 | 13.26% | 62.77% | 9.36% | 13.84% | 9.36% |
Randolph Middle | Middle (6-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.60 | 1,148 | 91.07% | 22.30 | 33.10% | 30.75% | 27.44% | 25.52% | 13.94% |
Merry Oaks International Academy | Elementary (PK-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.62 | 642 | 8.32% | 14.60 | 99.53% | 4.36% | 64.49% | 28.82% | 1.09% |
Highland Mill Montessori | Elementary (PK-6) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.68 | 315 | 93.21% | 14.00 | 17.14% | 40.32% | 9.84% | 40.00% | 3.81% |
Myers Park High School | High (9-12) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.71 | 3,593 | 74.92% | 21.80 | 25.55% | 57.53% | 15.47% | 21.10% | 2.73% |
Oakhurst STEAM Academy | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.71 | 567 | 40.15% | 16.10 | 98.59% | 17.28% | 33.16% | 39.51% | 3.70% |
Cotswold Elementary | Elementary (3-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.73 | 342 | 49.40% | 13.90 | 46.78% | 35.09% | 12.57% | 42.11% | 4.39% |
Marie G Davis School | Elementary (K-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.77 | 355 | 3.73% | 14.00 | 99.15% | 0.56% | 43.38% | 53.80% | 0.00% |
Shamrock Gardens Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.79 | 497 | 50.13% | 17.40 | 99.40% | 46.48% | 21.13% | 24.35% | 2.82% |
Eastway Middle | Middle (6-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.83 | 820 | 7.65% | 15.60 | 99.63% | 5.12% | 62.80% | 27.68% | 1.95% |
Bruns Avenue Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.89 | 326 | 1.00% | 14.80 | 99.08% | 1.84% | 23.62% | 71.78% | 0.92% |
Selwyn Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.92 | 651 | 95.21% | 16.30 | 14.59% | 71.27% | 6.91% | 12.60% | 4.30% |
Alexander Graham Middle | Middle (6-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 2.99 | 1,245 | 45.28% | 18.80 | 37.51% | 34.22% | 34.06% | 25.46% | 2.65% |
Oaklawn Language Academy | Elementary (K-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 3.12 | 508 | 57.86% | 12.70 | 50.79% | 6.89% | 64.57% | 26.57% | 0.59% |
Druid Hills Academy | Elementary (PK-8) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 3.29 | 270 | 2.60% | 9.10 | 98.89% | 1.48% | 26.67% | 65.56% | 3.70% |
Garinger High School | High (9-12) | Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools | 3.35 | 1,677 | 9.42% | 17.00 | 99.82% | 3.52% | 55.69% | 35.60% | 2.80% |
For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:
The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.
Name | Level | Type | Faith Affiliation | Coed | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presbyterian Academy | Private (5-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.29 | 24 | - | 9.60 | - | 54.17% | 0.00% | 8.33% | 12.50% |
Epiphany School Of Charlotte | Private (4-9) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.88 | 19 | - | 3.30 | - | 94.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Brookstone Schools | Private (K-8) | Private | Christian (no specific denomination) | Coed | 1.00 | 207 | - | 10.30 | - | 2.90% | 2.90% | 56.52% | 37.68% |
Trinity Episcopal School | Private (K-8) | Private | Episcopal | Coed | 1.02 | 441 | - | 8.80 | - | 72.11% | 12.47% | 9.07% | 0.23% |
Christ Church Preschool And Kindergarten | Private (PK-K) | Private | Episcopal | Coed | 1.55 | 229 | - | 9.60 | - | 10.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Kent Academy | Private (K-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.57 | 30 | - | 3.70 | - | 83.33% | 0.00% | 10.00% | 6.67% |
Charlotte Montessori School | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.61 | 191 | - | 14.00 | - | 4.71% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 1.57% |
Sedgefield School | Private (PK-6) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.07 | 78 | - | 7.10 | - | 58.97% | 1.28% | 1.28% | 0.00% |
Holy Trinity Catholic Middle School | Private (6-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 2.08 | 936 | - | 14.40 | - | 88.57% | 4.91% | 1.50% | 2.03% |
St Ann Catholic School | Private (PK-5) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 2.38 | 293 | - | 23.00 | - | 68.60% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Charlotte Lab School | Alternative (K-12) | Charter | - | - | 2.79 | 991 | - | 15.40 | 33.70% | 34.91% | 14.13% | 40.46% | 1.41% |
Emerald School Of Excellence | Private (9-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.86 | 23 | - | 5.00 | - | 91.30% | 4.35% | 0.00% | 4.35% |
VERITAS Community School CFA | Elementary (K-8) | Charter | - | - | 2.98 | 169 | 0.07% | 13.80 | - | 7.10% | 10.06% | 71.60% | 0.00% |
Philips Academy | Private (6-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 3.14 | 47 | - | 4.90 | - | 72.34% | 6.38% | 14.89% | 2.13% |
The Nest Academy | Private (2-12) | Private | Christian (no specific denomination) | Coed | 3.15 | 33 | - | 6.10 | - | 3.03% | 12.12% | 54.55% | 30.30% |
Adventist Christian Academy | Private (K-8) | Private | Seventh-Day Adventist | Coed | 3.18 | 66 | - | 13.40 | - | 6.06% | 46.97% | 15.15% | 31.82% |
Teaching Achieving Students Academy | Private (K-8) | Private | Other | Coed | 3.20 | 27 | - | 10.30 | - | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% |
Charlotte Leadership Academy | Private (K-12) | Private | Christian (no specific denomination) | Coed | 3.20 | 64 | - | 11.00 | - | 0.00% | 0.00% | 96.88% | 0.00% |
Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.
Poor or Very Poor Air Quality | 1.84% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worst Month | September | ||||||||
Major Pollutant | O3 | ||||||||
Pollutants | |||||||||
Bad or Very Bad SO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad NO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM10 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad O3 | 1.19% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad CO | 0.00% |
A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.
Sound Score | - | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Noise | |||||||||
Airports | - | ||||||||
Vehicular Traffic | - | ||||||||
Local Commercial and Community | - |
Using Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS), this section forecasts the potential earthquake impact and damage likelihood in the area over the next 50 years, offering vital insights into seismic risks.
PGA | 0.10 |
---|---|
Earthquake Risk | Low |
The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.
On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:
Has High-Risk Zones | Yes |
---|---|
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) | 0.38 |
Has Moderate-Risk Zones | Yes |
The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.
Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.
Walk Score® | 82 (Very Walkable) |
---|---|
Bike Score® | 58 (Bikeable) |
Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.
Marrital Status | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single, Never Married | 50.82% | ||||||||
Married | 35.59% | ||||||||
Other | 13.59% | ||||||||
Female to Male Ratio | 1.13 |
Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.
Has Any Pet | 36.41% |
---|---|
Has Dog(s) | 23.29% |
Has Cat(s) | 16.87% |
Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.
On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:
2020 Presidential Election Results | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Biden | 73.31% | ||||||||
Donald Trump | 24.58% |
Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.
Very Liberal | 35.77% |
---|---|
Somewhat Liberal | 42.91% |
Somewhat Conservative | 15.67% |
Very Conservative | 5.65% |
Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.
Median Home Value | 940,126 |
---|---|
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value | 1,027,062 |
5-Year Appreciation Forecast | 9.25% |
Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.
Median Monthly Rent | 1,919 |
---|---|
Median Home Value | 940,126 |
Rent to Value Ratio | 0.20% |
The Desirability Score measures how closely an area approaches a "perfect" neighborhood. This ideal is characterized by no crime or safety concerns, top-tier schools, a highly-educated population, no noise or air pollution, no risk of earthquakes or floods, high walkability, and a harmonious mix of nature and development.
The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating closer alignment to this ideal.
Desirability Score | 34.10 |
---|
The Bang for the Buck Index measures the ratio of the expected cost of a neighborhood based on its characteristics to its actual cost. An index close to 1 implies that the neighborhood's value is on par with its qualities.
An index greater than 1 indicates that the area offers excellent value for what it provides, while an index less than 1 suggests that the area may be overpriced.
Note that this measure is estimated relative to the entire US housing market, not just the local market.
Bang for the Buck | 22.00 |
---|
Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.