This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Shavano Park

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
1.00-mi Radius 07/09/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Shavano Park, TX, was incorporated in 1956 and is known for its lush, tree-lined streets and spacious lots.
  • The area is home to the Shavano Park Tennis Club, a local favorite for recreational activities.
  • Shavano Park is often perceived as an affluent, family-friendly community with a strong sense of local pride.
  • The neighborhood is known for its low-density residential feel, offering a serene escape from the hustle and bustle of nearby San Antonio.

Suitability

  • Homogeneous Cultural Preference: With 58% Non-Hispanic White residents, Shavano Park aligns well with your preference for a homogeneous community.
  • Serene/Natural Scenery: The area boasts 40% wooded areas and 22% landscaped spaces, providing a tranquil, natural environment.
  • Conservative Political Climate: The political climate is slightly conservative, with 51% voting for Trump in the 2020 election.
  • Long-Term Residence: The high owner-occupancy rate (75%) and a 4.15% 5-year home value appreciation forecast suggest stability and potential for long-term investment.
  • Age Demographics: The median age is 50, which might be higher than ideal for a young couple looking for a more vibrant, youthful community.

The Positive

  • High Education Levels: 70% of residents have a college or graduate degree, indicating a well-educated community.
  • High Median Household Income: The median household income is $150,976, suggesting economic stability and affluence.
  • Low Personal Crime Index: With a personal crime index of 55, the area is significantly safer than the national average.
  • Quality Schools: The North East Independent School District has a state rank percentile of 56, which is above average.

The Negative

  • Population Decline: A 5-year population growth forecast of -0.84% may indicate a declining or aging population.
  • High Flood Risk: The area has a high flood hazard, which could pose risks to property and personal safety.
  • Low Walkability: With a Walk Score of 9/100, the area is highly car-dependent, which might be inconvenient for those who prefer walking.
  • Median Age: The median age of 50 years suggests a predominantly older population, which might not align with your lifestyle as a young couple.

Alternatives

  • Alamo Heights, TX : Known for its excellent schools and affluent community, Alamo Heights offers a similar serene environment with a slightly younger demographic.
  • Stone Oak, TX : This neighborhood has a mix of young families and professionals, offering a vibrant community with good schools and plenty of amenities.
  • Fair Oaks Ranch, TX : Offers a more rural feel with large lots and natural scenery, aligning well with your preference for a serene environment while still being close to San Antonio.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

67/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

63.67/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 4,297
Population (5-Year Projection) 4,261
5-Year Growth Forecast -0.84%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 1,368
Density Level Medium Low

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 1,810
Average Household Size 2.37
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 23.76%
Families without Kids 57.07%
Non-Families 19.17%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 50.00
Age Groups
0-9 Years 7.38%
10-19 Years 11.01%
20-34 Years 15.06%
35-49 Years 16.59%
50-64 Years 21.81%
65+ Years 28.16%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 58.20%
Hispanic 31.53%
Black/African American 2.02%
Asian 5.42%
Other 2.82%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 17.09
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 0.34%
High School or Some College 29.63%
College Degree 35.54%
Graduate/Professional Degree 34.49%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $151,000
On Food Stamps/SNAP 0.50%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 7.35%
$25K-$50K 10.99%
$50K-$100K 13.15%
$100K-$200K 31.88%
$200K+ 36.69%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 1,920
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 74.79%
Renter Occupied 19.48%
Vacant 5.73%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1999
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 28.54%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 50.36%
Old (Before 1980) 21.09%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 0
Closest Property (mi) -
Total Units 0
Units per Square Mile 0.00
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 22.28%
Residential Areas 34.48%
Urban & Commercial 1.33%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 40.17%
Wild Vegetation 1.71%
Farms & Gardens 0.01%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 108
Property Crime Index 117
Personal Crime Index 55

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 1
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.08
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 1
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 0.32
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.99
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 1
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 0
Other Offense 0
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 DAVID WARREN GAGE
14414 VANTAGE HILL, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78231
0.99 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Northside ISD
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 124
Number of Students 102,719
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.95
State Rank 529 out of 968
State Rank Percentile 45.35%
Other Nearby Districts North East ISD
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Blattman Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 1.15 531 96.15% 14.10 13.94% 37.85% 47.83% 2.64% 6.21%
Huebner Elementary Elementary (PK-5) North East ISD 1.28 529 88.12% 13.40 31.38% 37.81% 51.61% 3.59% 1.32%
Oak Meadow Elementary Elementary (PK-5) North East ISD 1.40 399 90.75% 10.70 35.34% 37.09% 51.88% 3.76% 1.00%
Rawlinson Middle Middle (6-8) Northside ISD 1.98 1,245 73.22% 16.20 37.59% 27.15% 53.09% 5.70% 8.51%
Clark High School High (9-12) Northside ISD 2.11 2,835 71.95% 17.20 41.38% 24.02% 56.44% 7.51% 7.23%
Locke Hill Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 2.27 522 51.65% 14.40 63.41% 18.20% 57.09% 12.07% 4.98%
Hobby Middle Middle (6-8) Northside ISD 2.60 850 40.47% 14.70 71.06% 18.24% 59.53% 10.35% 7.18%
Vineyard Ranch Elementary Elementary (PK-5) North East ISD 2.61 772 85.90% 14.30 22.28% 27.72% 58.68% 2.46% 6.87%
Howsman Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 2.77 653 20.57% 12.60 79.63% 8.42% 80.86% 8.12% 0.15%
Chavez Excel Academy High (12) Northside ISD 2.86 44 - 7.30 65.91% 25.00% 68.18% 4.55% 0.00%
Alternative Middle Middle (6-8) Northside ISD 2.87 86 - 6.60 77.91% 9.30% 74.42% 10.47% 3.49%
Hidden Forest Elementary Elementary (PK-5) North East ISD 2.89 563 84.91% 15.10 23.45% 52.75% 38.01% 5.15% 0.89%
Larkspur Elementary Elementary (PK-5) North East ISD 3.44 882 6.58% 13.70 89.80% 7.71% 76.08% 11.00% 1.36%
Churchill High School High (9-12) North East ISD 3.44 2,510 52.68% 15.70 43.19% 27.97% 61.39% 5.38% 2.03%
Colonies North Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 3.66 626 9.98% 12.70 84.66% 12.30% 37.22% 6.87% 31.47%
McDermott Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 3.95 683 7.34% 14.60 79.94% 8.35% 49.93% 16.54% 18.30%
Eisenhower Middle Middle (6-8) North East ISD 4.13 880 23.99% 15.60 66.82% 14.77% 72.61% 7.73% 1.48%
May Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 4.40 411 46.18% 12.40 49.15% 17.03% 64.23% 5.60% 6.81%
Wilderness Oak Elementary Elementary (PK-5) North East ISD 4.48 671 97.40% 16.90 20.86% 37.70% 40.24% 3.13% 11.48%
Harmony Hills Elementary Elementary (PK-5) North East ISD 4.48 400 38.15% 11.80 81.00% 12.25% 71.75% 9.25% 1.75%
Boone Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 4.54 479 31.14% 13.40 78.29% 12.73% 72.65% 6.89% 2.92%
Carnahan Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Northside ISD 4.56 569 47.23% 13.70 78.21% 15.99% 50.79% 4.04% 18.98%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Vineyard Christian School Private (PK-6) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.01 166 - 8.60 - 23.49% 27.11% 1.20% 0.00%
BASIS San Antonio- Shavano Campus High (6-12) Charter - - 1.12 1,018 97.30% 16.20 - 20.63% 29.86% 5.21% 39.59%
Torah Academy Of San Antonio Private (K-7) Private Jewish Coed 1.18 46 - 6.50 - 73.91% 17.39% 0.00% 4.35%
Primrose School Of Huebner Village Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.38 - - - - - - - -
Country Home Learning Center #1 Ltd Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.67 - - - - - - - -
Cornerstone Christian Schools Private (PK-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.75 1,612 - 12.70 - 28.29% 47.89% 6.45% 0.93%
The Montessori School Of San Antonio Private (PK-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.91 296 - 5.00 - 29.39% 34.80% 3.38% 3.38%
Concordia Lutheran School Private (PK-8) Private Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod Coed 2.33 359 - 7.40 - 75.77% 8.91% 1.11% 4.74%
University United Methodist Day School Private (PK-2) Private Methodist Coed 2.35 225 - 9.00 - 14.22% 0.89% 0.00% 0.89%
Nobis Pacem Private (PK-12) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.96 1,600 - 31.50 - 12.50% 75.00% 1.25% 0.00%
Eleanor Kolitz Hebrew Language Academy Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 3.05 478 88.19% 13.20 18.20% 35.77% 52.09% 1.67% 5.44%
St Matthew Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 3.15 614 - 15.40 - 20.85% 69.22% 1.63% 3.26%
Great Hearts Forest Heights Alternative (K-10) Charter - - 3.54 1,050 - 19.00 20.38% 34.67% 43.43% 2.38% 17.14%
Immersion Montessori Academy Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.85 35 - 4.40 - 40.00% 22.86% 0.00% 0.00%
The Christian School At Castle Hills Private (PK-12) Private Other Coed 3.91 712 - 12.80 - 30.20% 34.55% 5.62% 2.25%
Coker Early Learning Center Private (PK-K) Private Methodist Coed 3.98 193 - 11.50 - 11.92% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Colonial Hills United Methodist School Private (PK-K) Private Methodist Coed 4.01 70 - 8.80 - 2.86% 2.86% 0.00% 2.86%
St George Episcopal School Private (K-8) Private Episcopal Coed 4.12 499 - 9.30 - 32.67% 60.72% 2.40% 3.61%
Montessori Children's House Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.13 47 - 2.00 - 4.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Suburban School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.16 70 - 6.00 - 4.29% 4.29% 0.00% 0.00%
Holy Spirit Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 4.28 375 - 12.40 - 17.87% 72.00% 0.53% 1.87%
Rolling Hills Catholic School And Antonian Middle Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 4.34 94 - 8.70 - 27.66% 51.06% 0.00% 1.06%
Islamic Academy Of San Antonio (Iasa) Private (PK-6) Private Islamic Coed 4.43 69 - 5.00 - 34.78% 2.90% 11.59% 24.64%
Somerset Academy Collegiate Alternative (PK-12) Charter - - 4.50 1,367 - 17.90 72.57% 10.39% 79.44% 6.95% 0.95%
Leaf Spring School At Sonterra Private (K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.50 12 - 12.00 - 50.00% 8.33% 16.67% 25.00%
Fusion Academy Private (6-10) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.52 10 - 10.00 - 90.00% 0.00% 10.00% 0.00%
Country Home Learning Center No. 2 Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.56 162 - 11.00 - 4.32% 6.79% 1.23% 0.62%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CITY OF SHAVANO PARK
Water Health Score 4.55 / 5 Excellent
Population Served 2,200
Primary Source Ground water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0013 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.82%
Worst Month September
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.09%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 2
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 0
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 72 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.02
Earthquake Risk Almost None

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, A)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.39
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 9 (Car-Dependent)
Bike Score® 31 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 23.70%
Married 67.79%
Other 8.51%
Female to Male Ratio 0.97

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 49.06%
Has Dog(s) 36.02%
Has Cat(s) 20.83%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 47.31%
Donald Trump 51.10%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 19.59%
Somewhat Liberal 32.68%
Somewhat Conservative 29.25%
Very Conservative 18.48%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 613,107
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 638,542
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 4.15%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,744
Median Home Value 613,107
Rent to Value Ratio 0.28%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.