This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Shelby Park

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.50-mi Radius 08/28/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Charm: Shelby Park is named after Kentucky's first governor, Isaac Shelby, and boasts a rich history with many buildings dating back to the early 20th century.
  • Architectural Diversity: The neighborhood features a mix of architectural styles, including Victorian homes and early 20th-century bungalows, adding to its unique charm.
  • Community Hub: Shelby Park itself is a central gathering place, offering green spaces, playgrounds, and sports facilities, making it a focal point for community events and activities.

Suitability

  • Young Professionals: With a high percentage of young adults (42%) and a vibrant rental market (55% renter-occupied), this area is ideal for young professionals seeking affordable housing close to downtown Louisville.
  • Families with Children: The low percentage of families with children (14%) and the Jefferson County School District's low state rank percentile (15) may not make this the best choice for families prioritizing education.
  • Retirees: The area might not be the best fit for retirees due to the low percentage of seniors (10%) and higher crime rates, which could be a concern for those seeking a quieter, safer environment.

The Positive

  • Strong Rental Market: With 55% of properties being renter-occupied, the area offers a robust rental market, making it easier to find rental properties.
  • High Value Appreciation: The 5-year home value appreciation forecast of 24.73% suggests strong investment potential for homebuyers.
  • Bike-Friendly: A bike score of 74 indicates that the area is very bikeable, providing an eco-friendly and healthy transportation option.

The Negative

  • High Crime Rates: The property crime index of 280 and personal crime index of 397 are significantly above the national average, which could be a major concern for safety-conscious residents.
  • Older Housing Stock: With 92.56% of buildings constructed before 1980, potential homeowners may face higher maintenance costs and fewer modern amenities.
  • Low School Performance: The Jefferson County School District ranks in the 15th percentile statewide, which may be a drawback for families with school-aged children.

Alternatives

  • Germantown : Just a short distance from Shelby Park, Germantown offers a similar historic charm but with a slightly lower crime rate and a more active community scene.
  • Highlands : Known for its vibrant nightlife, eclectic shops, and higher walkability score, the Highlands area is ideal for young professionals and those seeking a more dynamic urban environment.
  • Clifton : This neighborhood offers a mix of historic homes and modern amenities, with better school ratings and a more balanced demographic, making it a great alternative for families and professionals alike.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

25/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

48/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 5,657
Population (5-Year Projection) 5,693
5-Year Growth Forecast 0.64%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 7,161
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 2,796
Average Household Size 2.02
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 14.38%
Families without Kids 21.60%
Non-Families 64.02%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 34.40
Age Groups
0-9 Years 10.85%
10-19 Years 7.92%
20-34 Years 32.70%
35-49 Years 22.03%
50-64 Years 16.65%
65+ Years 9.85%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 52.59%
Hispanic 4.35%
Black/African American 35.21%
Asian 1.11%
Other 6.74%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.09
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 9.93%
High School or Some College 49.92%
College Degree 23.57%
Graduate/Professional Degree 16.59%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $39,800
On Food Stamps/SNAP 16.17%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 32.08%
$25K-$50K 28.08%
$50K-$100K 21.35%
$100K-$200K 15.56%
$200K+ 2.93%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 3,307
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 30.00%
Renter Occupied 54.55%
Vacant 15.45%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1939
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 0.79%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 6.65%
Old (Before 1980) 92.56%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 5
Closest Property (mi) 0.19
Total Units 100
Units per Square Mile 126.58
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 3 (87 Units)
LIHTC 2 (13 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 4.47%
Residential Areas 64.61%
Urban & Commercial 29.09%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 1.37%
Wild Vegetation 0.00%
Farms & Gardens 0.46%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 298
Property Crime Index 280
Personal Crime Index 397

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 2
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.63
Involving DUI 100.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 20
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 25.32
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.08
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 9
Rape 2
Sexual Battery 1
Other Offense 8
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 JESSE WADE ISERAL
531 Camp ST, Louisville, KY 40203
0.08 mi Offense Against Children
2 MICHAEL HATHCOCK
1279 S Preston St #3, Louisville, KY 40203
0.10 mi Offense Against Children
3 FRANK PAUL LOWE
1279 South Preston St Apt 3, Louisville, KY 40203
0.12 mi Offense Against Children
4 WILLIAM JOHN DODSON
424 Marret AVE, Louisville, KY 40208
0.15 mi Offense Against Children
5 JAMES TODD JACKSON
1247 South Clay ST, Louisville, KY 40203
0.23 mi Other Offense
6 LEE LAY
629 East Oak ST, Louisville, KY 40203
0.25 mi Offense Against Children
7 JOSEPH CHARLES BOWDEN
629 E Oak ST, Louisville, KY 40203
0.26 mi Other Offense
8 MARK SCHWARZ
622 East Saint Catherine ST, Louisville, KY 40203
0.30 mi Other Offense
9 TIMOTHY EUGENE DICKERSON
1361 S FLOYD ST 2, LOUISVILLE, KY 40208
0.31 mi Rape
10 BOBBY GENE BRASHIER
1026 S JACKSON ST, LOUISVILLE, KY 40203
0.33 mi Rape
11 DARRELL RAY DUNBAR
806 Mulberry St #E, Louisville, KY 40217
0.42 mi Other Offense
12 TERRANCE HANKS
1109 South Brook ST, Louisville, KY 40203
0.42 mi Other Offense
13 RICHARD J STACY
1109 South Brook St Apt #2, Louisville, KY 40203
0.43 mi Offense Against Children
14 RICHARD J STACY
1109 S BROOK ST # 2, LOUISVILLE, KY 40203-2715
0.43 mi Offense Against Children
15 JOHNNY CISSELL
834 Ash ST, Louisville, KY 40217
0.44 mi Other Offense
16 MARCOS ANDREW MAIKEN
1037 South Shelby ST, Louisville, KY 40203
0.46 mi Offense Against Children
17 KENNETH LESLIE LEWIS
1433 S BROOK ST, LOUISVILLE, KY 40208
0.47 mi Other Offense
18 DON R REYNOLDS
1436 SOUTH SHELBY ST, LOUISVILLE, KY 40217
0.47 mi Sexual Battery
19 EDDIE JUNIOR BAXTER
216 E Kentucky St Apt 10, Louisville, KY 40203
0.49 mi Offense Against Children
20 EDDIE JUNIOR BAXTER
216 EAST KENTUCKY STREET, LOUISVILLE, KY 40203
0.49 mi Other Offense

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Jefferson County School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 163
Number of Students 95,230
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.73
State Rank 136 out of 160
State Rank Percentile 15.00%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Engelhard Elementary Elementary (K-5) Jefferson County 0.59 276 1.46% 10.10 76.09% 11.96% 7.25% 70.65% 0.72%
Heuser Hearing & Language Academy Elementary (PK-K) Jefferson County 0.61 6 - 2.80 - 50.00% 16.67% 33.33% 0.00%
Cochran Elementary Elementary (K-5) Jefferson County 1.04 324 9.32% 13.10 75.62% 30.25% 8.33% 50.93% 3.40%
U of L PACT Program High (12) Jefferson County 1.09 19 - 9.00 26.32% 84.21% 0.00% 15.79% 0.00%
Ackerly High (5-12) Jefferson County 1.12 7 - 3.50 - 57.14% 14.29% 28.57% 0.00%
Breckinridge Metropolitan High High (7-12) Jefferson County 1.18 78 4.35% 3.00 87.18% 10.26% 3.85% 82.05% 0.00%
Ahrens Educational Resource Center High (12) Jefferson County 1.29 32 - 6.20 71.88% 37.50% 15.62% 40.62% 3.12%
Bloom Elementary Elementary (K-5) Jefferson County 1.55 525 86.90% 16.80 23.81% 80.19% 3.81% 6.67% 1.14%
Western Day Treatment Elementary (K-5) Jefferson County 1.67 15 - 2.70 66.67% 46.67% 13.33% 26.67% 0.00%
Mcferran Preparatory Academy Elementary (PK-5) Jefferson County 1.67 691 0.15% 16.70 82.92% 5.79% 13.17% 76.41% 0.72%
Dr. J. Blaine Hudson Middle School Middle (6) Jefferson County 1.94 0 - - - - - - -
Frayser Elementary Elementary (K-5) Jefferson County 2.36 318 9.61% 11.30 80.19% 13.21% 22.01% 55.35% 1.57%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Heuser Hearing & Language Academy Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.59 46 - 1.50 - 10.87% 4.35% 8.70% 0.00%
Shelby Academy Elementary (K-5) Magnet - - 0.59 449 0.44% 15.10 74.61% 17.37% 13.36% 63.25% 0.45%
Meyzeek Middle Middle (6-8) Magnet - - 0.70 930 89.91% 19.00 42.37% 31.40% 5.48% 28.17% 28.39%
Noe Middle Middle (6-8) Magnet - - 0.80 1,347 88.99% 20.20 45.81% 47.36% 8.76% 31.55% 4.83%
duPont Manual High High (9-12) Magnet - - 0.86 1,929 99.64% 18.10 21.93% 50.29% 6.79% 18.71% 19.85%
Presentation Academy Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Girls 0.93 165 - 6.30 - 69.70% 6.06% 18.79% 0.61%
Francis Parker School of Louisville Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.11 388 - 7.50 - 73.97% 4.38% 12.63% 3.61%
Jefferson County Traditional Middle Middle (6-8) Magnet - - 1.26 877 67.89% 17.80 44.47% 47.09% 7.64% 36.49% 2.28%
J. Graham Brown School Alternative (K-12) Magnet - - 1.32 738 - 15.90 28.32% 60.03% 5.28% 21.54% 4.34%
Nativity Academy At St Boniface Private (6-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.38 56 - 9.40 - 5.36% 17.86% 71.43% 0.00%
St Xavier High School Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Boys 1.43 1,275 - 11.20 - 88.08% 3.92% 2.75% 2.27%
Highland Presbyterian Nursery And Weekday School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.56 160 - 7.50 - 9.38% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Lincoln Elementary Performing Arts Elementary (K-5) Magnet - - 1.68 575 48.33% 16.00 50.26% 38.26% 8.70% 43.48% 0.70%
Central High Magnet Career Academy High (9-12) Magnet - - 1.75 1,220 22.46% 16.80 70.08% 5.66% 12.87% 73.52% 3.69%
Breckinridge-Franklin Elementary Elementary (K-5) Magnet - - 1.77 266 15.43% 8.90 82.71% 23.68% 10.15% 57.14% 0.38%
Coleridge-Taylor Montessori Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Magnet - - 1.79 404 1.31% 13.60 79.46% 10.89% 3.22% 76.49% 0.74%
Audubon Traditional Elementary Elementary (K-5) Magnet - - 1.86 614 75.55% 20.00 45.11% 49.84% 4.89% 30.94% 5.70%
St Stephen Martyr School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.88 287 - 15.00 - 73.87% 0.35% 3.48% 1.05%
Dr. William H. Perry Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Magnet - - 1.96 318 1.16% 12.50 83.96% 4.40% 3.46% 88.36% 0.00%
St James Catholic School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.97 105 - 10.00 - 58.10% 1.90% 31.43% 3.81%
St Agnes School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.02 503 - 14.00 - 80.12% 0.40% 0.60% 0.99%
Grace M. James Academy of Excellence Middle (6-8) Magnet - - 2.06 361 31.50% 16.40 64.27% 6.37% 4.99% 79.78% 1.39%
Louisville Collegiate School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.11 750 - 9.20 - 72.40% 2.53% 6.80% 3.20%
The De Paul School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.30 143 - 6.80 - 84.62% 2.10% 8.39% 2.80%
Highland Middle Middle (6-8) Magnet - - 2.32 801 14.37% 16.50 59.18% 44.19% 12.86% 34.08% 2.25%
Emma L. Minnis Junior Academy Private (PK-8) Private Seventh-Day Adventist Coed 2.40 48 - 10.60 - 0.00% 0.00% 95.83% 0.00%
Good Spirit Development Center Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.42 - - - - - - - -
Johnson Traditional Middle Middle (6-8) Magnet - - 2.60 742 4.89% 20.30 64.42% 24.12% 6.87% 59.30% 3.77%
St Francis Of Assisi School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.75 258 - 15.30 - 86.82% 3.10% 1.16% 0.00%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System LOUISVILLE WATER COMPANY
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 764,769
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0011 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 1.29%
Worst Month August
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.46%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 24
High-Risk Sites 1
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 1.27
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.44
Facility Types
Active 3
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 1
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 2

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 68 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Active
Vehicular Traffic Busy
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.14
Earthquake Risk Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones -
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) -
Has Moderate-Risk Zones -

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 63 (Somewhat Walkable)
Bike Score® 74 (Very Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 54.95%
Married 29.84%
Other 15.21%
Female to Male Ratio 0.97

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 38.70%
Has Dog(s) 25.75%
Has Cat(s) 19.99%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 86.19%
Donald Trump 11.91%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 27.61%
Somewhat Liberal 30.14%
Somewhat Conservative 23.73%
Very Conservative 18.52%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 219,590
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 273,889
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 24.73%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,140
Median Home Value 219,590
Rent to Value Ratio 0.52%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.