This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Southernside

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.50-mi Radius 08/19/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Significance: Southernside, Greenville, SC, is one of the city's oldest neighborhoods, with a rich history dating back to the early 20th century. It was originally a hub for the African American community and has several historical landmarks that reflect its cultural heritage.
  • Unique Architecture: The neighborhood features a mix of architectural styles, including charming bungalows, mid-century modern homes, and newly renovated townhouses, offering a diverse visual landscape.
  • Community Events: Southernside hosts the annual "Southernside Reunion Festival," a vibrant event celebrating the neighborhood's history and community spirit with music, food, and local vendors.
  • Famous Residents: The area is known for being the home of several notable personalities, including civil rights activists and local artists who have contributed to Greenville's cultural fabric.

Suitability

  • Young Professionals: With a median age of 41.1 years and a significant portion of the population being young adults (30%), Southernside is well-suited for young professionals. The high renter occupancy rate (58%) and affordable median monthly rent ($1,023) make it an attractive option for those not ready to buy a home.
  • Families with Children: Families with children might find the area less ideal due to the high property and personal crime indices (231 and 294, respectively). However, the Greenville County School District is highly ranked (83rd percentile), which could be a redeeming factor.
  • Retirees: The neighborhood's calm sound score (85) and the presence of a significant senior population (19%) make it a peaceful and welcoming environment for retirees. However, the high flood risk should be a consideration for those with mobility issues or health concerns.

The Positive

  • Strong Community Feel: The neighborhood's diverse racial and ethnic composition fosters a rich cultural environment. The high percentage of non-families (63%) suggests a community that is inclusive and welcoming to singles and young professionals.
  • Educational Opportunities: With 37% of residents holding a college or graduate degree, Southernside boasts a well-educated population. The high-quality Greenville County School District further enhances the area's appeal for families prioritizing education.
  • Future Growth: The 5-year population growth forecast of 13.71% and a 5-year home value appreciation forecast of 18.06% indicate a thriving and rapidly developing neighborhood, making it a potentially lucrative investment.

The Negative

  • High Crime Rates: The property crime index of 231 and personal crime index of 294 are significantly above the national average, which could be a deterrent for families and individuals prioritizing safety.
  • Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could pose challenges for property maintenance and insurance costs. Potential residents should consider flood insurance and mitigation measures.
  • Low Walkability: With a walk score of 39/100, Southernside is car-dependent, which might not be ideal for those who prefer walking or using public transportation. The transit score is also low (26/100), indicating limited public transport options.

Alternatives

  • North Main : Located just a few miles north of Southernside, North Main offers a similar community feel but with lower crime rates and higher walkability. The area has a mix of historic homes and new developments, making it attractive for both young professionals and families.
  • Augusta Road : This neighborhood is known for its upscale homes and excellent schools. While it may be more expensive, it offers a safer environment and better amenities, including parks and shopping centers, making it ideal for families and retirees.
  • West End : Close to downtown Greenville, West End provides a vibrant urban lifestyle with numerous restaurants, shops, and cultural attractions. It has a higher walk score and lower crime rates compared to Southernside, making it a great option for young professionals and those who enjoy city living.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

45/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

52/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 1,846
Population (5-Year Projection) 2,099
5-Year Growth Forecast 13.71%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 2,337
Density Level Medium

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 765
Average Household Size 2.41
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 19.08%
Families without Kids 18.04%
Non-Families 62.88%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 41.10
Age Groups
0-9 Years 10.13%
10-19 Years 8.78%
20-34 Years 21.78%
35-49 Years 19.50%
50-64 Years 20.75%
65+ Years 19.07%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 38.62%
Hispanic 8.67%
Black/African American 47.83%
Asian 0.92%
Other 3.95%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 14.70
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 13.29%
High School or Some College 49.93%
College Degree 21.55%
Graduate/Professional Degree 15.23%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $51,900
On Food Stamps/SNAP 21.05%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 32.55%
$25K-$50K 15.56%
$50K-$100K 25.88%
$100K-$200K 18.95%
$200K+ 7.19%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 835
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 33.53%
Renter Occupied 58.08%
Vacant 8.38%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1983
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.36%
Recent (2010-2019) 27.31%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 17.72%
Old (Before 1980) 54.61%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 3
Closest Property (mi) 0.19
Total Units 110
Units per Square Mile 139.24
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 1 (67 Units)
LIHTC 2 (43 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 17.08%
Residential Areas 59.24%
Urban & Commercial 16.99%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 3.78%
Wild Vegetation 0.00%
Farms & Gardens 1.96%
Marshes & Swamps 0.77%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 241
Property Crime Index 231
Personal Crime Index 294

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 0
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.00
Involving DUI -

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 14
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 17.72
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.31
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 4
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 0
Other Offense 10
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 PAUL DAVID THOMAS
575 WEST WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Other Offense
2 BRIAN DOUGLAS NEWTON
575 WEST WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Other Offense
3 MICHAEL LEWIS TAYLOR
575 WEST WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Other Offense
4 GEORGE GRANT
575 WEST WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Other Offense
5 RODNEY SIMMONS
575 WEST WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Offense Against Children
6 ROBERT B TURNER
575 WEST WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Offense Against Children
7 RONALD LEE WADE
575 WEST WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Other Offense
8 JAMES ELWOOD LAWRENCE
101 MULBERRY ST B104, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.31 mi Other Offense
9 JERRY JEROME RIDGEWAY
575 W WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.32 mi Other Offense
10 STEVE BLAIR CAMDEN
575 W WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.32 mi Other Offense
11 DAQUAN ANTHONY SEYMORE
575 W WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.32 mi Other Offense
12 WENDELL SANDERS
575 W WASHINGTON ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
13 RAY BRUCE AUSTIN
220 WILLARD ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29611
0.37 mi Offense Against Children
14 FRANK SAMUEL BURNSIDE
213 MULBERRY ST, GREENVILLE, SC 29601
0.43 mi Other Offense

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Greenville County School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 91
Number of Students 77,978
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.93
State Rank 13 out of 77
State Rank Percentile 83.12%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
A.J. Whittenberg Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 0.45 467 85.25% 14.20 70.45% 31.26% 14.56% 47.97% 0.21%
Greenville Senior High Academy High (9-12) Greenville 01 1.06 1,729 69.20% 19.80 59.69% 44.30% 27.65% 24.29% 0.46%
Stone Academy Elementary (K-5) Greenville 01 1.17 534 98.76% 13.10 33.15% 76.97% 4.31% 12.73% 1.87%
Alexander Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 1.52 449 3.57% 12.50 100.00% 11.36% 49.89% 33.63% 0.22%
Monaview Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 1.69 615 44.88% 12.60 100.00% 10.08% 79.19% 8.29% 0.00%
Hollis Academy Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 1.80 608 29.81% 12.10 100.00% 7.73% 51.48% 36.35% 0.16%
Cherrydale Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 2.03 689 24.07% 13.90 100.00% 10.01% 57.47% 27.14% 0.29%
Summit Drive Elementary Elementary (K-5) Greenville 01 2.28 504 77.80% 13.30 53.17% 61.11% 15.67% 17.86% 0.60%
East North Street Academy Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 2.38 709 61.49% 13.50 100.00% 24.40% 22.00% 46.40% 0.85%
Greenville Middle Academy Middle (6-8) Greenville 01 2.48 775 82.77% 14.20 63.23% 48.77% 17.81% 25.42% 1.42%
Lakeview Middle Middle (6-8) Greenville 01 2.57 758 5.23% 12.60 100.00% 8.84% 60.82% 25.99% 0.26%
Augusta Circle Elementary Elementary (K-5) Greenville 01 2.57 557 99.53% 16.00 11.49% 88.15% 3.05% 6.64% 0.90%
Sterling School Elementary (PK-8) Greenville 01 2.76 690 99.38% 13.00 41.45% 53.91% 4.64% 25.07% 10.72%
League Academy Middle (6-8) Greenville 01 2.91 790 88.31% 15.20 55.32% 60.00% 12.53% 20.25% 0.89%
Welcome Elementary Elementary (K-5) Greenville 01 2.91 652 31.68% 13.30 100.00% 12.73% 52.30% 30.06% 0.00%
Berea Elementary Elementary (K-5) Greenville 01 3.04 462 41.77% 11.70 100.00% 17.32% 58.87% 20.35% 1.08%
Westcliffe Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 3.08 292 58.54% 10.40 100.00% 28.77% 48.29% 16.44% 0.00%
Berea High High (9-12) Greenville 01 3.25 1,244 19.41% 16.90 100.00% 17.68% 51.29% 25.80% 0.88%
Blythe Academy Elementary (PK-5) Greenville 01 3.39 881 79.97% 15.90 62.20% 35.98% 29.17% 27.47% 1.25%
Carolina Academy (High) High (9-12) Greenville 01 3.39 1,047 14.77% 18.50 100.00% 13.18% 52.63% 30.28% 0.10%
Hughes Academy of Science and Technology Middle (6-8) Greenville 01 3.50 1,020 66.77% 16.10 69.41% 34.22% 26.57% 33.43% 0.88%
Tanglewood Middle Middle (6-8) Greenville 01 3.80 745 10.46% 12.00 100.00% 12.48% 48.99% 35.17% 0.00%
Sara Collins Elementary Elementary (K-5) Greenville 01 3.87 861 83.23% 14.50 54.94% 55.87% 11.85% 26.71% 0.93%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
St Anthony Of Padua Catholic School Private (PK-5) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.53 138 - 12.70 - 1.45% 27.54% 27.54% 1.45%
St Marys Catholic School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.60 323 - 13.80 - 72.76% 5.57% 1.55% 1.55%
Upstate Montessori Academy Private (PK-3) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.66 70 - 3.30 - 31.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
First Presbyterian Academy Downtown Private (PK-1) Private Presbyterian Coed 0.69 147 - 18.00 - 21.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.68%
Footprints Christian Academy Private (PK-6) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 0.70 26 - 3.70 - 0.00% 3.85% 76.92% 0.00%
Legacy Early College Alternative (PK-12) Charter - - 0.82 1,610 - 12.20 100.00% 3.29% 40.81% 48.76% 0.12%
Christ Church Episcopal Preschool Private (PK-K) Private Episcopal Coed 1.10 - - - - - - - -
Haynsworth School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.26 100 - 11.00 - 11.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Best Skills Academy Private (7-11) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.43 3 - 1.50 - 33.33% 33.33% 33.33% 0.00%
Veritas Preparatory School Private (K-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.91 209 - 10.10 - 91.39% 0.96% 1.44% 0.48%
First Baptist Day School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.41 219 - 6.30 - 8.22% 0.00% 0.46% 0.00%
Einstein Academy Private (1-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.41 14 - 7.00 - 78.57% 14.29% 7.14% 0.00%
Greenville Memorial Childcare Center Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.43 25 - 9.00 - 20.00% 12.00% 4.00% 0.00%
Wheatley Montessori School Private (K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.53 2 - 2.00 - 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 0.00%
Westminster Weekday School Private (K) Private Presbyterian Coed 2.54 36 - 9.00 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Tabernacle Christian School Private (PK-12) Private Baptist Coed 2.56 144 - 9.70 - 80.56% 14.58% 1.39% 0.69%
Meyer Center for Special Children Elementary (PK-2) Charter - - 2.82 87 - 5.40 67.82% 58.62% 14.94% 20.69% 0.00%
Greenville Technical Charter High School High (9-12) Charter - - 2.90 498 97.05% 15.70 6.02% 58.43% 15.46% 12.25% 8.63%
Bob Jones Academy Private (PK-12) Private Baptist Coed 3.01 1,241 - 10.40 - 73.65% 1.85% 0.40% 3.71%
Hampton Park Christian School Private (K-12) Private Baptist Coed 3.09 483 - 15.00 - 92.34% 4.35% 1.86% 1.45%
White Oak Baptist Church Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Baptist Coed 3.20 87 - 11.00 - 12.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Chandler School Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.31 52 - 3.30 - 90.38% 5.77% 1.92% 0.00%
U U World Of Children Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.72 53 - 3.90 - 43.40% 3.77% 1.89% 1.89%
Montessori School Of Greenville Private (PK-3) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.86 - - - - - - - -

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System GREENVILLE WATER (2310001)
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 396,265
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.17%
Worst Month June
Major Pollutant -
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 10
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 7
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 85 (Calm)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Calm
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.20
Earthquake Risk Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.00
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 39 (Car-Dependent)
Bike Score® 86 (Very Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 43.73%
Married 33.02%
Other 23.26%
Female to Male Ratio 0.91

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 42.09%
Has Dog(s) 28.76%
Has Cat(s) 21.57%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 68.85%
Donald Trump 28.58%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 22.29%
Somewhat Liberal 32.05%
Somewhat Conservative 26.69%
Very Conservative 18.97%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 327,857
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 387,059
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 18.06%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,023
Median Home Value 327,857
Rent to Value Ratio 0.31%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.