This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Treeline Trail

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
2.00-mi Radius 09/03/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Charm: Holly Springs, GA, is known for its rich history, dating back to its establishment in the late 19th century. The city has preserved its historical charm with landmarks such as the Holly Springs Train Depot, which now serves as a community center.
  • Green Spaces Galore: The area boasts an impressive 44% of wooded areas, offering residents a natural retreat and numerous outdoor activities. The Green Oak Park is a local favorite, providing a serene escape from the hustle and bustle of daily life.
  • Family-Friendly Vibes: With 39% of households being families with children, Holly Springs is a community-oriented neighborhood where family values and activities are highly prioritized.

Suitability

  • Families with Children: This area is ideal for families with children due to its high percentage of family households (39%) and excellent school district (Cherokee County School District, ranked in the 87th percentile). The low crime rates further enhance its appeal for families.
  • Young Professionals: Young professionals might find the area less appealing due to the low walk and bike scores (7/100 and 24/100, respectively), making it highly car-dependent. However, the high median household income ($128,852) suggests a prosperous community that could offer networking opportunities.
  • Retirees: Retirees may appreciate the calm and quiet environment (Sound Score of 95) and the low crime rates. However, the high flood risk could be a concern for those looking for a low-maintenance lifestyle.

The Positive

  • High Safety Standards: The area boasts a Property Crime Index of 51 and a Personal Crime Index of 27, both significantly lower than the national average, making it a very safe place to live.
  • Educational Excellence: The Cherokee County School District is in the 87th percentile statewide, ensuring high-quality education for children in the area.
  • Strong Community Investment: With an 88% owner-occupancy rate, residents are more likely to be financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being.

The Negative

  • High Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could lead to potential property damage and higher insurance costs. Investing in flood insurance and flood-proofing measures is advisable.
  • Car-Dependent Lifestyle: With a Walk Score of 7/100, the area is highly car-dependent, which might not be suitable for those who prefer walking or biking for their daily errands.
  • Lack of Diversity: The racial/ethnic composition is predominantly Non-Hispanic White (80%), which might not appeal to those seeking a more diverse community.

Alternatives

  • Woodstock, GA : Just a short drive from Holly Springs, Woodstock offers a vibrant downtown area with shops, restaurants, and cultural events. It has a slightly higher walk score and a more diverse population.
  • Canton, GA : Located nearby, Canton provides a similar suburban feel but with more affordable housing options and a growing arts scene. The schools are also highly rated, making it a good alternative for families.
  • Alpharetta, GA : For those willing to invest a bit more, Alpharetta offers excellent schools, a bustling downtown area, and numerous parks and recreational facilities. It also has a higher walk score, making it more pedestrian-friendly.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

78/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

86/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 19,705
Population (5-Year Projection) 21,319
5-Year Growth Forecast 8.19%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 1,568
Density Level Medium Low

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 6,742
Average Household Size 2.92
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 38.67%
Families without Kids 31.89%
Non-Families 29.44%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 40.60
Age Groups
0-9 Years 12.54%
10-19 Years 14.92%
20-34 Years 15.34%
35-49 Years 20.83%
50-64 Years 20.19%
65+ Years 16.19%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 80.22%
Hispanic 7.74%
Black/African American 4.68%
Asian 1.93%
Other 5.42%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.75
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 2.74%
High School or Some College 48.01%
College Degree 31.29%
Graduate/Professional Degree 17.96%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $128,900
On Food Stamps/SNAP 2.43%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 4.06%
$25K-$50K 6.23%
$50K-$100K 18.94%
$100K-$200K 46.35%
$200K+ 24.40%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 7,070
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 88.49%
Renter Occupied 6.87%
Vacant 4.64%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 2005
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 2.14%
Recent (2010-2019) 21.33%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 55.91%
Old (Before 1980) 20.62%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 0
Closest Property (mi) -
Total Units 0
Units per Square Mile 0.00
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 18.88%
Residential Areas 11.12%
Urban & Commercial 0.46%
Water Bodies 1.16%
Wooded Areas 43.89%
Wild Vegetation 0.90%
Farms & Gardens 23.25%
Marshes & Swamps 0.18%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 47
Property Crime Index 51
Personal Crime Index 27

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 0
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.00
Involving DUI -

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 6
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 0.48
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 1.45
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 4
Rape 2
Sexual Battery 0
Other Offense 0
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS JAMES
360 RAVEN DRIVE, CANTON, GA 30115
1.45 mi Offense Against Children
2 MICHAEL OLAN MCGUIRE
868 OXFORD DRIVE, CANTON, GA 30115
1.59 mi Offense Against Children
3 KEITH LEE ROBERTS
4205 HICKORY POINT DRIVE, CANTON, GA 30115
1.65 mi Offense Against Children
4 JOHNNY LEE STARKS
214 BRIDGEWATER TRAIL, CANTON, GA 30115
1.84 mi Rape
5 MICHAEL ANTHONY TAPPY
220 LACY ROAD, CANTON, GA 30115
1.85 mi Rape
6 MICHAEL DAVID STINSON
1035 AVERY CREEK DRIVE, WOODSTOCK, GA 30188
1.86 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Cherokee County School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 37
Number of Students 41,891
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.08
State Rank 25 out of 193
State Rank Percentile 87.05%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Sequoyah High School High (9-12) Cherokee County 0.66 2,083 87.36% 16.00 18.58% 70.04% 15.79% 7.73% 1.82%
Dean Rusk Middle School Middle (6-8) Cherokee County 0.95 1,473 84.08% 15.10 23.42% 66.94% 18.06% 7.20% 3.19%
Hickory Flat Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 0.98 910 86.95% 15.60 10.77% 68.02% 11.43% 6.81% 6.48%
Holly Springs Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 1.83 744 65.85% 13.60 36.02% 64.38% 20.03% 6.72% 1.34%
Indian Knoll Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 2.04 868 84.98% 14.50 30.76% 66.94% 19.47% 7.03% 1.04%
Mountain Road Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 3.17 405 87.52% 12.60 20.25% 69.88% 12.59% 5.43% 3.46%
Avery Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 3.75 1,128 87.19% 15.30 15.07% 79.08% 11.97% 2.75% 1.15%
Johnston Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 4.31 472 77.26% 13.80 36.23% 62.29% 26.27% 2.54% 1.69%
Mill Creek Middle School Middle (6-8) Cherokee County 4.58 1,333 83.74% 15.30 24.68% 63.09% 21.83% 6.45% 3.83%
Arnold Mill Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 4.66 810 83.66% 14.10 21.85% 66.17% 17.78% 6.30% 2.10%
River Ridge High School High (9-12) Cherokee County 4.74 1,914 89.80% 16.30 20.48% 63.58% 21.37% 6.58% 3.92%
William G. Hasty- Senior Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 4.76 1,064 39.49% 11.00 74.91% 21.15% 64.10% 8.36% 0.19%
Little River Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 5.18 1,272 81.86% 14.30 23.43% 57.70% 20.99% 7.47% 5.90%
Cherokee High School High (9-12) Cherokee County 5.32 2,937 68.51% 15.20 38.00% 53.56% 33.84% 8.21% 0.82%
iGrad Virtual Academy School High (9-12) Cherokee County 5.39 241 51.00% 12.10 16.60% 65.56% 17.01% 10.37% 1.66%
Freedom Middle School Middle (6-8) Cherokee County 5.46 922 81.66% 14.10 18.66% 69.41% 14.32% 8.03% 2.71%
Liberty Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 5.50 986 71.59% 13.30 31.85% 61.36% 17.65% 11.36% 1.42%
J. Knox Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 5.98 886 73.65% 12.80 40.41% 57.22% 32.62% 4.06% 0.56%
Teasley Middle School Middle (6-8) Cherokee County 6.49 1,606 49.65% 13.10 51.81% 50.93% 37.86% 6.16% 0.62%
Sixes Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 6.51 714 77.50% 14.40 14.85% 77.45% 10.78% 3.22% 1.68%
Woodstock Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 6.54 1,145 71.02% 14.20 36.33% 51.27% 23.76% 12.84% 4.10%
Macedonia Elementary School Elementary (PK-5) Cherokee County 6.93 745 86.54% 14.70 12.62% 82.42% 9.80% 2.42% 0.94%
Creekview High School High (9-12) Cherokee County 7.25 2,126 92.68% 16.80 11.99% 82.93% 10.11% 2.82% 0.89%
Creekland Middle School Middle (6-8) Cherokee County 7.39 1,511 82.53% 16.40 15.68% 82.53% 9.86% 3.24% 0.86%
Woodstock Middle School Middle (6-8) Cherokee County 7.70 1,083 66.96% 14.80 38.60% 48.66% 25.67% 14.96% 2.59%
Woodstock High School High (9-12) Cherokee County 7.76 2,044 81.60% 15.40 24.90% 57.78% 20.74% 12.43% 2.40%
E. T. Booth Middle School Middle (6-8) Cherokee County 7.98 1,654 73.36% 15.40 33.37% 55.08% 24.79% 11.12% 3.20%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Canton Homeschool Resources And The Haven Academy Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.22 183 - 10.40 - 80.33% 7.10% 6.01% 2.19%
Hickory Flat Umc Preschool Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Methodist Coed 1.35 192 - 6.50 - 7.29% 0.52% 0.00% 0.00%
Anchor Christian Academy Private (PK-7) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.49 - - - - - - - -
The Goddard School - Canton I Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.63 - - - - - - - -
Messiah Christain Academy Private (PK-K) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 1.63 43 - 13.00 - 27.91% 2.33% 0.00% 0.00%
Compass Prep Academy Private (K-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 3.54 50 - 8.40 - 82.00% 2.00% 2.00% 0.00%
Academy At Double H Ranch Private (1-11) Private Baptist Coed 3.63 - - - - - - - -
Community Christian School Private (K-8) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 4.18 73 - 10.40 - 69.86% 8.22% 2.74% 0.00%
Lyndon Academy Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.21 203 - 8.30 - 88.18% 0.99% 3.94% 0.49%
Timothy Lutheran Preschool Private (PK-K) Private Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod Coed 4.35 91 - 9.00 - 2.20% 5.49% 0.00% 2.20%
The King's Academy Private (PK-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 4.39 1,050 - 46.50 - 90.38% 3.33% 0.86% 1.43%
Cherokee Christian Schools Private (K-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 4.50 319 - 11.60 - 78.06% 9.09% 5.64% 1.57%
Cherokee Charter Academy Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 5.50 622 58.05% 14.10 18.49% 48.07% 21.86% 21.54% 2.57%
Mill Springs Academy Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 5.65 271 - 6.80 - 73.43% 7.38% 6.27% 3.32%
Brenwood Academy Private (PK-3) Private Nonsectarian Coed 6.14 - - - - - - - -
The Carpenter's Shop Private (PK-K) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 6.65 161 - 7.00 - 11.18% 1.86% 0.00% 0.00%
Porter Academy Private (K-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 7.01 69 - 4.90 - 57.97% 1.45% 20.29% 8.70%
The Grant Academy Private (4-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 7.27 9 - 3.40 - 55.56% 0.00% 33.33% 11.11%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System NORTH FULTON COUNTY
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 437,032
Primary Source Surface water purchased
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0019 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.86%
Worst Month August
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.37%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 2
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 2
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 95 (Calm)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Calm
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.15
Earthquake Risk Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, A)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.23
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 7 (Car-Dependent)
Bike Score® 24 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 23.40%
Married 65.12%
Other 11.48%
Female to Male Ratio 1.03

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 56.08%
Has Dog(s) 44.85%
Has Cat(s) 22.12%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 25.37%
Donald Trump 73.11%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 13.64%
Somewhat Liberal 24.30%
Somewhat Conservative 36.39%
Very Conservative 25.66%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 459,219
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 473,679
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 3.15%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,141
Median Home Value 459,219
Rent to Value Ratio 0.47%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.